Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
We have a thief here on UHH.
Aug 12, 2013 09:53:24 #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
There are several in this thread....
ok, I thought maybe there was more that he'd lifted from UHH members.
Aug 12, 2013 10:25:00 #
sinatraman wrote:
we need a tall tree, a shortrope and a fast horse
funny, coming from a guy who claims to be a Christian and a ex-cop to boot...hoot hoot! Sinman, you need to just get over yourself already...
Aug 12, 2013 13:16:26 #
TNmike wrote:
Old Salt, if you read the very 1st post on this thread the original photographer of the stolen pictures had a water mark and the thief removed his water mark and placed his own on the photos. Any photos and really anything posted on the internet is subject to theft. TNmike
Removal of the watermark/exif data and reposting is a violation of the law.
http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Aug 12, 2013 14:19:06 #
Aug 12, 2013 14:27:06 #
Wall-E wrote:
Excellent find! Based on this article, I have started a new FAQ entitled Removal of the watermark/exif data and reposting is a violation of the law.
http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/
http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/
FAQ: How are my photographs legally protected? at http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-140083-1.html
I have temporarily left this FAQ unlocked, so any UHH member may add other legal precedence, as found on the internet. We are NOT looking for opinions. Eventually, all relevant cites will be added to original post, and it will be locked to prevent any further, direct contributions on this particular FAQ. We will add newly found, pertinent website URLs, as they are found and brought to my attention, as Forum Manager.
Aug 12, 2013 14:45:59 #
quote:of Nikonian92
I have temporarily left this FAQ unlocked, so any UHH member may add other legal precedence, as found on the internet. We are NOT looking for opinions. Eventually, all relevant cites will be added to original post, and it will be locked to prevent any further, direct contributions on this particular FAQ. We will add newly found, pertinent website URLs, as they are found and brought to my attention, as Forum Manager.[/quote]
Excellent idea since this come up in various guises over the years. :thumbup:
I have temporarily left this FAQ unlocked, so any UHH member may add other legal precedence, as found on the internet. We are NOT looking for opinions. Eventually, all relevant cites will be added to original post, and it will be locked to prevent any further, direct contributions on this particular FAQ. We will add newly found, pertinent website URLs, as they are found and brought to my attention, as Forum Manager.[/quote]
Excellent idea since this come up in various guises over the years. :thumbup:
Aug 12, 2013 15:24:57 #
Joe,
Just heard about the theft. Very bad. I wonder how somebody could post it on the same site without thinking that there would be consequences. Too bad you have to have this annoyance. I almost feel sorry for him - can't you just take your own pictures and be proud of something you did yourself, no matter how they come out?
Just heard about the theft. Very bad. I wonder how somebody could post it on the same site without thinking that there would be consequences. Too bad you have to have this annoyance. I almost feel sorry for him - can't you just take your own pictures and be proud of something you did yourself, no matter how they come out?
Aug 12, 2013 16:15:06 #
DrLo wrote:
Joe,
Just heard about the theft. Very bad. I wonder how somebody could post it on the same site without thinking that there would be consequences. Too bad you have to have this annoyance. I almost feel sorry for him - can't you just take your own pictures and be proud of something you did yourself, no matter how they come out?
Just heard about the theft. Very bad. I wonder how somebody could post it on the same site without thinking that there would be consequences. Too bad you have to have this annoyance. I almost feel sorry for him - can't you just take your own pictures and be proud of something you did yourself, no matter how they come out?
As I said earlier, I think the individual got EXACTLY what he/she wanted. I don't think there was ever any belief that they wouldn't be 'caught'. This thread, and all the subsequent publicity that goes with it, is the very reason he/she re-posted the pics as their own. They also believe that they can't be identified. Time will tell on that one.
If they can 'steal' a photo, they can also steal a fake identity.
Aug 12, 2013 16:18:25 #
gym wrote:
Exactly!If they can 'steal' a photo, they can also steal a fake identity.
Aug 12, 2013 16:25:16 #
Aug 12, 2013 16:27:51 #
boydimages wrote:
The word "Castration" comes to mind.
How about penalties for females doing this?
:shock:
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Aug 12, 2013 16:35:40 #
gmcase wrote:
Being female is enough of a penalty.How about penalties for females doing this?
Did I say that out loud?
<Bazinga!>
Aug 12, 2013 16:42:02 #
gmcase wrote:
How about penalties for females doing this?
:shock:
:shock:
Good Question, gmcase!
Aug 12, 2013 17:31:15 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Being female is enough of a penalty.
Did I say that out loud?
<Bazinga!>
Did I say that out loud?
<Bazinga!>
I showed this to my wife. She is visiting LA next month and is well armed.
:XD:
Aug 12, 2013 18:05:21 #
gmcase wrote:
Uh-oh! :shock:I showed this to my wife. She is visiting LA next month and is well armed.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.