Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Question about Canon 1.2 or 1.8 lens for portraits.
May 30, 2013 23:38:37   #
DK Loc: SD
 
One of our photo club members wants to rent one of these lenses for a Senior portrait shoot. He wants to know which is best. Since I don't shoot portraits and would never use one of those lenses (Wildlife Photographer), I said I would ask what the hedgehogs think.

Reply
May 31, 2013 02:24:13   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
DK wrote:
One of our photo club members wants to rent one of these lenses for a Senior portrait shoot. He wants to know which is best. Since I don't shoot portraits and would never use one of those lenses (Wildlife Photographer), I said I would ask what the hedgehogs think.


DK, of course the 1.2 is always better, it's a lot more lens. but for senior shots it's only advantage would be bokeh since he will most likely use flash. If your friend is using a FF, then the only 1.2 option is the 85.
I'd love to have one for that perfect nose to ears focus.
Though he may get more mileage out of a 70-200, 2.8. VERY nice compression at the longer lengths. He can also get full body and tight shots without moving. Time is of the essence with some teenagers.
Good luck

Reply
May 31, 2013 09:10:24   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
Use the 50mm at about f8 you will have good depth of field, sharpness, etc. If he is shooting canon or nikon can buy one for about $125 and use it for the rest of his life.

Reply
 
 
May 31, 2013 09:13:47   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
DK wrote:
One of our photo club members wants to rent one of these lenses for a Senior portrait shoot. He wants to know which is best. Since I don't shoot portraits and would never use one of those lenses (Wildlife Photographer), I said I would ask what the hedgehogs think.


I've owned the 1.2L, and the 1.4.

The 1.2L is a very high end lens but it's a bit soft wide open.

The 1.4 is is also a bit soft wide open but he's likely to be shooting at f/8 or so, so that won't matter.

The 1.4 is "basically" 90% the lens that the 1.2L is if you're not talking about build quality, or a nit-picker over bokeh...in other words...the images will be fine either way.

But 50mm is a bit short for anything other than "full body" portraits....I'd be much more inclined to rent the 85mm f/1.2L.

Reply
May 31, 2013 09:26:58   #
Bill gomberg
 
ole sarg wrote:
Use the 50mm at about f8 you will have good depth of field, sharpness, etc. If he is shooting canon or nikon can buy one for about $125 and use it for the rest of his life.


Amen .

Reply
May 31, 2013 09:40:19   #
Bill gomberg
 
rpavich wrote:
I've owned the 1.2L, and the 1.4.

The 1.2L is a very high end lens but it's a bit soft wide open.

The 1.4 is is also a bit soft wide open but he's likely to be shooting at f/8 or so, so that won't matter.

The 1.4 is "basically" 90% the lens that the 1.2L is if you're not talking about build quality, or a nit-picker over bokeh...in other words...the images will be fine either way.

But 50mm is a bit short for anything other than "full body" portraits....I'd be much more inclined to rent the 85mm f/1.2L.
I've owned the 1.2L, and the 1.4. br br The 1.2L ... (show quote)


For head shots ; 85 TO 135 . For head to waist ; a fifty will do fine . I've both 85 and 135 " L " lenses . The 85 is wonderful . The 135 is beyond description . Both were bought used in as new condition .The 85 is the original non - I.s. version and I'm very happy with it.

Reply
May 31, 2013 10:23:02   #
nikondoug
 
If this person wants to shoot portraits, f1.2 or f1.4 has way to short of depth of field for portraits. You can buy a lens with this kind of aperture, but you want to be shooting around f5.6 or f8 which on all lenses will be your sharpest point, along with not distorting your images from nose to ear on your subjects.

Reply
 
 
May 31, 2013 10:31:50   #
alann Loc: Virginia
 
Be aware that shooting at 1.2 is not easy. If you shoot at a 45 degree angle and focus on the closest eye, the other eye will be out of focus. If the subject moves, even a little, your shot is trashed. A good source of info on canon lenses is "the digital picture". By the way, the 85L is very sharp from center to edge at 1.2. It is my favorite portrait and street lens.

Reply
May 31, 2013 12:08:42   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
if as some here say,you are shooting a still subject at f 5.6-8.0, then a 2.8 would do just fine. many tout the tamron 90mm f2.8 for macro and portraits.

Reply
May 31, 2013 12:10:45   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Sorry- I don't see it.
What format? FF or APS-C?

Reply
May 31, 2013 12:45:55   #
Bill gomberg
 
bull drink water wrote:
if as some here say,you are shooting a still subject at f 5.6-8.0, then a 2.8 would do just fine. many tout the tamron 90mm f2.8 for macro and portraits.


True about the Tamron .. Excellent . Whether for macro or headshots . For both uses I recommend manual focus .

Reply
 
 
May 31, 2013 15:16:16   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
I like 100 F2 for either FF or crop frame - very versatile.......

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.