Why are DSLRs getting smaller
May 3, 2013 14:26:57 #
Not a really interesting subject but one that concerns me at least.
I don't have very large hands but I do find that even with a 60D my 2 smaller fingers end up going under the camera, darn annoying, so I have battery grips on all cameras (also I swap a lot from Po to La modes and the extra release is invaluable)
However why manufacturers insist on making smaller and smaller DSLRs amazes me, I don't want a Bridge or 4/3 camera I WANT a camera I can hold that is large-ish.
The 2 D7000s I bought are smaller than the 60D.
Perhaps we should have men's and women's cameras
I don't have very large hands but I do find that even with a 60D my 2 smaller fingers end up going under the camera, darn annoying, so I have battery grips on all cameras (also I swap a lot from Po to La modes and the extra release is invaluable)
However why manufacturers insist on making smaller and smaller DSLRs amazes me, I don't want a Bridge or 4/3 camera I WANT a camera I can hold that is large-ish.
The 2 D7000s I bought are smaller than the 60D.
Perhaps we should have men's and women's cameras
May 3, 2013 14:32:08 #
Available in colors to match our outfits?
I find what you said to be true. I didn't like using the D7000 without a grip, it was too small for me. The D200 & 300 were comfortable either way and the D800 may be too big with a grip. Perhaps add-on sizing pads?
I find what you said to be true. I didn't like using the D7000 without a grip, it was too small for me. The D200 & 300 were comfortable either way and the D800 may be too big with a grip. Perhaps add-on sizing pads?
May 3, 2013 14:40:41 #
I don't like the smaller Rebel series (I currently am using two 7Ds), the rebels feel like toys, and I have small girly hands.
May 3, 2013 14:45:35 #
Annie_Girl wrote:
I don't like the smaller Rebel series (I currently am using two 7Ds), the rebels feel like toys, and I have small girly hands.
Comparing them to the 7D, the Rebels ARE toys. Capable toys, but there is just something about a camera that fits perfectly.
May 3, 2013 14:51:04 #
JR1 wrote:
Not a really interesting subject but one that conc... (show quote)
I think a smaller camera will be less intimidating to many people thinking about to get into DSLR photography. Compare a Nikon P510 to a D4 - huge difference. Someone going from a P&S might prefer a smaller DSLR to a larger one.
Also, think of how much manufacturers save by using less material in their cameras. :D
May 3, 2013 15:12:46 #
Doesn't portability come into this issue. Anyone remember the first cell phones, and what you can buy now, with a 12-14mp camera too? Nothing wrong with the march of progress IMHO.
May 3, 2013 15:17:45 #
Annie_Girl wrote:
I don't like the smaller Rebel series (I currently am using two 7Ds), the rebels feel like toys, and I have small girly hands.
The 7d is a good "feel" camera if you know what I mean
May 3, 2013 15:19:50 #
cockney greg wrote:
Doesn't portability come into this issue. Anyone remember the first cell phones, and what you can buy now, with a 12-14mp camera too? Nothing wrong with the march of progress IMHO.
No, it has nothing to do with portability, if I wanted that I would get a compact, it has everything to do with "balance" and comfort/control.
I have tried both my 120-400 and 150-500 Sigmas on the new Canons and even with a grip they are uncomfortable and harder to manage
May 3, 2013 15:25:05 #
JR1 wrote:
The 7d is a good "feel" camera if you know what I mean
Dirty mind went else where :oops:
now that my filthy mind is clear, yes 7D has a nice build quailty feel to it.
May 3, 2013 15:26:56 #
mtnredhed
Loc: The part of NorCal that doesn't move
JR1 wrote:
The 7d is a good "feel" camera if you know what I mean
And I hate to say it, but thats one of the big reasons that sold me on it vs the 60D.
May 3, 2013 15:31:49 #
[quote=JR1]Not a really interesting subject but one that concerns me at least.
However why manufacturers insist on making smaller and smaller DSLRs amazes me, I don't want a Bridge or 4/3 camera I WANT a camera I can hold that is large-ish.
JR1:Wait till you reach your 70s ! Then tell me how easy it is to lug a large DSLR with Flash and Lens... Do you realy think that you can hold it steady without using a tripod :?:
I'll stay with my bridge camera... It may not be the best but does the job for me..
However why manufacturers insist on making smaller and smaller DSLRs amazes me, I don't want a Bridge or 4/3 camera I WANT a camera I can hold that is large-ish.
JR1:Wait till you reach your 70s ! Then tell me how easy it is to lug a large DSLR with Flash and Lens... Do you realy think that you can hold it steady without using a tripod :?:
I'll stay with my bridge camera... It may not be the best but does the job for me..
May 3, 2013 15:32:34 #
JR1 wrote:
No, it has nothing to do with portability, if I wanted that I would get a compact, it has everything to do with "balance" and comfort/control.
I have tried both my 120-400 and 150-500 Sigmas on the new Canons and even with a grip they are uncomfortable and harder to manage
I have tried both my 120-400 and 150-500 Sigmas on the new Canons and even with a grip they are uncomfortable and harder to manage
I'm not a pro like you but I've just moved up to a system to grow into from Samsung NX which is getting me back to what I used to like ( EX Cannon A-1 user in the 70's) Spent a lotta dosh based on a D800 and hope to grow into it, not saying I'm there yet but not wanting to go thru lots of changes, and D800 is that bit smaller, even tho' I have a grip too.
May 3, 2013 15:37:09 #
I have that problem with my P7700. It has so many buttons and wheels, it's a bit like trying to hold onto a crumbly jam scone that has too much jam in it. Having said that, I wouldn't want to give up the pocketability (and I'm sure I'll get used to it sooner or later).
May 3, 2013 15:46:25 #
JR1 wrote:
However why manufacturers insist on making smaller and smaller DSLRs amazes me, I don't want a Bridge or 4/3 camera I WANT a camera I can hold that is large-ish.
They "insist" on making smaller cameras because that's what consumers want. As more point and shooters move up to DSLR, they want the convenience of small size. I don't suppose the manufacturers dumped a few mil into a new camera without doing some market research.
JR1 wrote:
Of course it does. APS-C = smaller sensor = more capability to downsize. At least full-frame and medium format can be downsized less. I'm not disagreeing with what you want. My D3100 sometimes makes me want a larger body.No, it has nothing to do with portability,
May 3, 2013 15:48:11 #
JR1 wrote:
Not a really interesting subject but one that concerns me at least.
Perhaps we should have men's and women's cameras
Perhaps we should have men's and women's cameras
JR, that's a pretty chuavenistic statement. Why would a woman need a differenent camera than you??
If you need a bigger camera, that's why they make pro models.
Smaller is usually less money.
EVERY day Hogs complain about a system that's too heavy. For various reasons some are not able to handle a heavy camera and welcome the smaller cameras.
We adapt. Maybe you could get an old Speed Graphic with a digital back. Should be big enough for you.
Before the new friendly, warm fuzzy era, it was called "survival of the fittest".
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.