Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Contests, Challenges, Periodicals
WPC 1312 - DIY ANALYSIS
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Mar 30, 2013 14:34:16   #
Nightski
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
Nothing looks particularly in focus. The white balance is way off and the shadows are harsh. Start by stopping down from f/4 to f/8 or f/11 and purchase a couple of inexpensive studio lights, reflector, diffuser, and an umbrella to soften the light. After you have the proper lighting and proper exposure with a greater DOF then you can shoot a white card and set a custom white balance. Once you have a well lit, well balanced exposure then you can work on composition. This part is up to you, the photographer; but sometimes less is more.
Nothing looks particularly in focus. The white ba... (show quote)


Thank-you Jeep-Daddy. I usually take all my shots outside, so you're right. I really wasn't prepared for this type of shot. Even if I don't have all the right equipment, I participate in the contests anyway. I always learn something, and that is what it's all about. I will work on getting the things you mentioned for my next indoor shot.

Reply
Mar 30, 2013 15:42:56   #
Nightski
 
St3v3M wrote:
Nightski has graciously volunteered her WPC 1312 - DIY entry for critique and analysis to find out what she could have done to make it better. Be nice, but be honest as this will help everyone with their craft. Thank you Nightski and thank you everyone!

from WPC 1312 - DIY http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/photo_contest_ratings.jsp?pcnum=51


Ok, I have another question. This is directed to everyone who participated today in critiquing my photo. I know I set myself up for this one, but if UHH allowed critiques under entered photos, would you all have been so brutally honest as you were with me today? I came prepared for it, but what of a new person who is not. If this is what would happen to someone that is brand new, I am not sure it is such a good idea. And don't get me wrong. I appreciated all your comments, because I am so ready for all this advice. Some people may not be.

Reply
Mar 30, 2013 15:47:53   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
Nightski wrote:
Ok, I have another question. This is directed to everyone who participated today in critiquing my photo. I know I set myself up for this one, but if UHH allowed critiques under entered photos, would you all have been so brutally honest as you were with me today? I came prepared for it, but what of a new person who is not. If this is what would happen to someone that is brand new, I am not sure it is such a good idea. And don't get me wrong. I appreciated all your comments, because I am so ready for all this advice. Some people may not be.
Ok, I have another question. This is directed to e... (show quote)


The Photo Analysis forum is meant for those brave souls who want feedback, otherwise you are just showing them off.

Reply
 
 
Mar 30, 2013 18:13:35   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Nightski wrote:
if UHH allowed critiques under entered photos, would you all have been so brutally honest as you were with me today? I came prepared for it, but what of a new person who is not. If this is what would happen to someone that is brand new, I am not sure it is such a good idea.


Nightski,

C&C is usually not given unless asked for. UHH does have a Photo Analysis section for general critiques. If an image is uploaded there people are looking for improvement and should expect honest advise. The Photo Gallery is for people that just want to show off and where they want to get a few pats on the back. There is always someone out there that will give you a pat on the back but in the Photo Analysis section there should not be any pats on the back unless the image is perfect. Most people that are looking for C&C don't have perfect images and need help. Some people aren't cut out to be critics.

I see that you did get quite a few votes for your pie so it was a good subject for the DIY topic. I believe you could have done much better or even won the contest if you had a magazine quality image. Just my humble opinion.

I posted the picture of a Jeep and me. I was the only one who voted for me. LOL. You made a pie that took you what, 2 hours, 3 hours to make? I made a Jeep that took me 10 years to build. I'm proud of it and thought it should have won the contest just on its merit. But it's just a snap shot of a person standing next to a Jeep and I should have known that it's the image that they are judging and not difficulty creating the subject or the merit of the subject that's important to the judges. Besides, who knows, some of the contestants might have a bunch of friends or family helping them out with votes.

Reply
Mar 30, 2013 19:26:48   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Hi jeep daddy, that post sounds remarkably like sour grapes from someone who doesn't think they should have been beaten by a "lady with a pie".
..merit of the subject..????
A pie is obviously a DIY, as you said, and as you also said - yours was a snapshot of a bloke next to a car.
I believe you could have done much better if yours was a magazine quality image.

Reply
Mar 30, 2013 19:33:52   #
tainkc Loc: Kansas City
 
Nightski wrote:
Thanks everyone for your feedback. The lighting issue is certainly a valid one. My home has terrible lighting, so I taped a toy, led lantern to the bottom of the cupboard to brighten it up. I do not have a tripod, so a long exposure would not have been possible. I also do not have an external flash yet. I did have a time arranging all my things in a pleasing manner. It never occurred to me to cut some things out. I can think of a few things looking at it now that I could do without. Cutting the pie is NOT an option, as the lattice work is important to me, and I would not want it ruined in the photo. Someone was right that I was trying to show DIY by including items used to make it. One of my chief criticisms of the photo, is that I had the apples and the roller more in focus than the pie. I am surprised no one has mentioned that. Thanks everybody! Nightski :)
Thanks everyone for your feedback. The lighting is... (show quote)
I could care less about the photo. I'm coming over!

Reply
Mar 30, 2013 20:28:20   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
lighthouse wrote:
Hi jeep daddy, that post sounds remarkably like sour grapes from someone who doesn't think they should have been beaten by a "lady with a pie".
..merit of the subject..????
A pie is obviously a DIY, as you said, and as you also said - yours was a snapshot of a bloke next to a car.
I believe you could have done much better if yours was a magazine quality image.


"sounds remarkably like sour grapes from someone who doesn't think they should have been beaten by a "lady with a pie"" Quite the opposite. I'm not complaining at all. I admit that my image is just a "bloke next to a car" and this is not a winner. Although, her pie was liked by many and the subject good. The image just wasn't that good.


"I believe you could have done much better if yours was a magazine quality image" I don't think my image, no matter the quality, would have won but her pie might have done better.

You must misunderstand me. I was just saying that even though I have a lot of pride in my Jeep DIY project, it was not the amount of time or difficulty of the DIY project that would win the contest, it is the image itself and the quality and creativity of the image . . . and possibly :shock: how many friends and family you ask to vote for you.

Reply
 
 
Mar 30, 2013 21:30:48   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
"sounds remarkably like sour grapes from someone who doesn't think they should have been beaten by a "lady with a pie"" Quite the opposite. I'm not complaining at all. I admit that my image is just a "bloke next to a car" and this is not a winner. Although, her pie was liked by many and the subject good. The image just wasn't that good.


"I believe you could have done much better if yours was a magazine quality image" I don't think my image, no matter the quality, would have won but her pie might have done better.

You must misunderstand me. I was just saying that even though I have a lot of pride in my Jeep DIY project, it was not the amount of time or difficulty of the DIY project that would win the contest, it is the image itself and the quality and creativity of the image . . . and possibly :shock: how many friends and family you ask to vote for you.
"sounds remarkably like sour grapes from some... (show quote)


Nah. Don't sell yourself short jeep daddy.
I think your image could have won - if you had taken it properly, and if it had been a decent image, instead of just the snapshot you submitted.

Reply
Mar 30, 2013 22:53:56   #
Nightski
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
"sounds remarkably like sour grapes from someone who doesn't think they should have been beaten by a "lady with a pie"" Quite the opposite. I'm not complaining at all. I admit that my image is just a "bloke next to a car" and this is not a winner. Although, her pie was liked by many and the subject good. The image just wasn't that good.


"I believe you could have done much better if yours was a magazine quality image" I don't think my image, no matter the quality, would have won but her pie might have done better.

You must misunderstand me. I was just saying that even though I have a lot of pride in my Jeep DIY project, it was not the amount of time or difficulty of the DIY project that would win the contest, it is the image itself and the quality and creativity of the image . . . and possibly :shock: how many friends and family you ask to vote for you.
"sounds remarkably like sour grapes from some... (show quote)


Jeep Daddy,
The whole purpose for the contests is to learn, and have fun doing it. If the entries had to be perfect, then certainly there would be very few people entering the contest. I did the best I could with the experience and equipment that I had. After all the feedback I had to day, I could probably do better tomorrow. That is the point of this whole exercise in DIY ANALYSIS, and that's why I participated in this. I wanted to show people how helpful it can be to receive constructive criticism. I felt everything was going pretty well until you insinuated that I cheated to get 10 votes. I did not. I do not have family and friends here voting for me. If you look back at the last 5 contests that I have participated in, you will see that I have never gotten more than 1 or 2 votes. I do not let anyone know what my entry is, I always get the shot during the contest week, and I always stick to the theme. I am honest and I follow the rules. I just want to make that clear.

Secondly you put down my DIY because you think yours is better. Did you know that I grew the raspberries in that cran-raspberry pie in my own garden? That I spend hours every summer weeding and watering my garden. I grow lots of fruits for my pies there. Also it takes me 2 days to make a pie, because I have a special way of making the crust. But, because I think my photo should speak for itself, I keep my titles short. If I feel as though I have to write a paragraph on my photo, then I must not be very confident that my photo speaks for itself. I have to say that I am very disappointed that someone who has been here as long as you have, has treated me ( a newcomer) the way you have. Your first response was helpful and constructive. You should have stopped there.
Regards, Nightski

Reply
Mar 31, 2013 01:39:44   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Nightski wrote:
Jeep Daddy,
The whole purpose for the contests is to learn, and have fun doing it. If the entries had to be perfect, then certainly there would be very few people entering the contest. I did the best I could with the experience and equipment that I had. After all the feedback I had to day, I could probably do better tomorrow. That is the point of this whole exercise in DIY ANALYSIS, and that's why I participated in this. I wanted to show people how helpful it can be to receive constructive criticism. I felt everything was going pretty well until you insinuated that I cheated to get 10 votes. I did not. I do not have family and friends here voting for me. If you look back at the last 5 contests that I have participated in, you will see that I have never gotten more than 1 or 2 votes. I do not let anyone know what my entry is, I always get the shot during the contest week, and I always stick to the theme. I am honest and I follow the rules. I just want to make that clear.

Secondly you put down my DIY (I'm sorry that you took me wrong but I'm not putting you or your image down) because you think yours is better. (I don't think mine is better and never said that. I just said I thought mine would win but after seeing all the others I know mine is just a snap shot of a bloke next to a Jeep. I'm trying to be humble. Please excuse me for being an honest critic.) If I feel as though I have to write a paragraph on my photo, then I must not be very confident that my photo speaks for itself. (What does my description have to do with anything. The rules encourage a title and or a description) I have to say that I am very disappointed that someone who has been here as long as you have, has treated me ( a newcomer) the way you have. ( Im sorry you feel that I have wronged you or treated you poorly. I am truly sorry)Your first response was helpful and constructive. You should have stopped there.
Regards, Nightski
Jeep Daddy, br The whole purpose for the contests... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 31, 2013 01:43:56   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
You guys know something, it's hard to put in writing the emotions and expressions of ones self and even harder for people to read someone else's written words and truly understand them. If I wanted to say something mean and rotten, you would definitely know that I was being mean and rotten. None of the things I implied in this thread are mean and or rotten.

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2013 06:24:20   #
Nightski
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
You guys know something, it's hard to put in writing the emotions and expressions of ones self and even harder for people to read someone else's written words and truly understand them. If I wanted to say something mean and rotten, you would definitely know that I was being mean and rotten. None of the things I implied in this thread are mean and or rotten.


Okay JeepDaddy, I am going to make another go at it. I looked up the photography work you've posted, and it's truly amazing. I did that because, about a week ago, a friend of yours told me that you are a talented photographer and that I should follow you because you are very helpful and knowledgeable. I have to say, I fail to understand why you took the cheap shot at me that you did about how I got my votes. That was personal, it wasn't professional. It leaves me wondering if I have said or done something in the past on the forum to offend you.

This car was entered in the low angle contest. http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/photo_contest_entry_details.jsp?pcenum=8553 I voted for it. I usually don't vote for cars, because it's not something that interests me, and they just don't catch my attention. This one did, because this man caught an image of this car that made me want to see more of it. Moreover, I could see from the small portion of the car that he showed in the photo that it was truly labor of love for him. He didn't have to say it either. I just knew by the photo. I think, with the ability that you have, you could have gotten a shot of your jeep that would have said the same thing. That's why I brought up the title. You can't tell people why your subject is special, you have to show them. Actually you made the same artistic mistake that I did. You tried to show too much.

I am going to tell you why I got so many votes. I posted food. It's like puppies and babies...it's a vote getter. I post a photo a day on my cover page on Facebook. I have a few family and friends that give occasional likes. One day I posted a griddle full of pancakes. I got more likes and comments than I had ever gotten on any photo I ever posted.

I hope that we can go away with an understanding of each other here. I am willing to take any valid criticism and put it to work, but I just won't be silent when my honesty and integrity have been challenged.
Regards, Nightski

Reply
Mar 31, 2013 10:31:18   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Nightski wrote:
Okay JeepDaddy, I am going to make another go at it. I looked up the photography work you've posted, and it's truly amazing. I did that because, about a week ago, a friend of yours told me that you are a talented photographer and that I should follow you because you are very helpful and knowledgeable. I have to say, I fail to understand why you took the cheap shot at me that you did about how I got my votes. That was personal, it wasn't professional. It leaves me wondering if I have said or done something in the past on the forum to offend you.

Regards, Nightski
Okay JeepDaddy, I am going to make another go at i... (show quote)


Nightski, You still fail to understand what I wrote. I did not take a cheap shot at you! You are taking this personally and it was not directed at you. I know for a fact that some people ask their friends and family to vote for them. I've been asked to vote for some of my friends images if I wasn't going to enter the contest. Please please please! Don't take this personal. I did not direct any of my comments toward you except for my C&C of your image. Most of the rest of what I said was about me and how wrong my image was.

This is the last time I will comment on anything you say or do since you seem to be so sensitive about what you think I said. Good bye.

Reply
Apr 1, 2013 09:31:34   #
carogray Loc: Santa Monica originally UK
 
St3v3M wrote:
Nightski has graciously volunteered her WPC 1312 - DIY entry for critique and analysis to find out what she could have done to make it better. Be nice, but be honest as this will help everyone with their craft. Thank you Nightski and thank you everyone!

from WPC 1312 - DIY http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/photo_contest_ratings.jsp?pcnum=51


It looks like everyone has answered for you - so thats great .. I agree I would try different lighting methods ..maybe photograph near a window so you get a nice lighting effect - or buy more lights, diffusers ect.. would shoot in about F8 to F10 ..focus and include.. just the pie ... and If you could cut the pie without disturbing the lattice work to show the inside of the pie might be good, the fruit ect. ...but as you say this might destroy your work - so maybe not...

Reply
Apr 1, 2013 09:52:45   #
Nightski
 
carogray wrote:
It looks like everyone has answered for you - so thats great .. I agree I would try different lighting methods ..maybe photograph near a window so you get a nice lighting effect - or buy more lights, diffusers ect.. would shoot in about F8 to F10 ..focus and include.. just the pie ... and If you could cut the pie without disturbing the lattice work to show the inside of the pie might be good, the fruit ect. ...but as you say this might destroy your work - so maybe not...


Thank-you carogray. I know, I thought I could come up with some make-shift lighting to solve my lighting problem that night, but now I see that I can't slip that one by any Hedgehoggers! :) It was the first time I had done a still life type of photo, but after all the tips, I now see that is was a little busy. I really do appreciate feedback like yours that sticks to the subject at hand.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Contests, Challenges, Periodicals
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.