Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: hawkman
Feb 20, 2018 09:08:46   #
One final attempt to see what I see and applying your input.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 19, 2018 08:52:10   #
I have been trying all the suggestions above and I just don't like it. Something about the blue is just not working for me. I did 5 sets this was the second set my 4th set I did at 110mm, 12 photo's and was better placement but I just can't get rid of the blue tint with out it being way to grainy. ISO got bumped to 400-450 as well.

So I'm gonna re-shoot it and see if I can get a better overall exposure and better placement of Mt. Shasta. We have some storm clouds moving in this week and freeze warnings so maybe the weather will help a little, hoping for just enough snow to make it all white.

I'll try sunrise/morning but this is tricky to since there is a shadow until the sun gets over the mountains behind me but Mount Shasta is very lit up and stands out. Plus I can go to the back of the property with less trees in the way and 1000ft closer.

I do like this photo and after everyone's feed back I do agree it could be way better. I see this everyday when I open my blinds so it's just a matter of me finding the right balance. You all also gave me some ideas I want to try with the foreground. The posted photo is from the top of the hill behind the house with a very steep decline.The ridge you see in the foreground is basically the edge of my property about 1 frame to the right.

Eventually I'll work on getting rid of those power lines and houses but baby steps.

Anyway
Thank you all for the input. It is very very much appreciated and I am very grateful you took the time to give feed back.

Have a wonderful Blessed day
Ronnie
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 21:56:57   #
rmorrison1116 wrote:
It's a panorama of the distant mountains and that is nice but it's unbalanced. Over 50% of the photo is sky; pretty much just clouds. If it were a picture of clouds with mountains in the background then different story but the picture is not about the clouds, it's about the mountains.


I see exactly what you are saying. I was looking at some zoomed in ones and same thing. I didn't even realize it till now. This helped a whole bunch

Thank you very much
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 21:46:00   #
R.G. wrote:
Lowering highlights usually helps to bring out detail from flattish, cloudy skies. If doing that in the main edit adversely affects the picture as a whole, it can be done via a selection. I usually select the sky for targeted adjustments as a matter of course. Clarity and contrast will both help to bring out shape and texture. Clarity will be particularly effective at bringing out the clouds' whispiness if that's what you're after. My personal preference is to avoid sharpening skies because I think they suit a softer look.

Darkening blue in the HSL section will also help to give definition to clouds, but that can result in blues that are too solid and heavy. Desaturating a bit will reduce that problem. If your editor has some form of dehaze, that usually has a positive effect on skies (may have to be applied globally, though).
Lowering highlights usually helps to bring out det... (show quote)


I will give all this a try. DXO is a little more limited than Light Room IMO. When I had both they worked very well together. Anyway I think I can do most of what you said. DXO has clear view/dehaze and also a gradient tool which helps to isolate the sky. Clear view, exposure and WB is usually where I start. I will try this out shortly and see what happens.
Thank you very much
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 13:12:12   #
Manny Jay wrote:
Downloaded it looks great! Fine detail front to back. Excellent!


Thank you I really do appreciate it. Good to know I am heading in the right direction.
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 13:08:55   #
rmorrison1116 wrote:
My opinion...
way too much sky and too dark.
That aside, nice picture.


By too much sky does it need more land/higher horizon? Maybe the bottom of the top 1/3
I did up the micro contrast to give the clouds some life and bring out the little bit of sun setting. In RL the storm clouds look cool at sunset but I seem to have a hard time making them look like I see them in camera. It just shoots boring flat grey lines with no kind of texture.

Is the image to dark as a whole or something else?

Thank you for the help.
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 11:53:47   #
I have never done a panorama before and I am sure there are some/many mistakes.

Mt. Shasta is roughly 35 miles away from my ridge where I took this photo. I used a D7000 with Nikkor 55-200, F8, shutter 1/50, ISO varied 200-280.
I used DXO photolab to process all 5 images with the same correction settings then send to Image Composite Editor to stitch.

For some reason after it gets stitched they seem to get really noisy so did one final edit before posting it here. It also seems to lose sharpness for some reason.

So I need to know whats wrong with the image. Any feed back is welcome good or bad.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 13, 2018 08:37:14   #
jaimeblackwell wrote:
At a computer tech / IT guy I’ll say this you give the age at 4-5 years old. It's overheating. Has it ever had a tune up? Have you ever cleaned out where the air exhausts from.
Most likely your computer is packed with a slew of temp files and cookies that will eat up resources. Also in cooling the laptop, there is a small radiator inside to disperse heat. That's probably clogged with dust. You can fix both of these issues for free or under 10.00. First if you hah a compressor, set the pressure at about 15 lbs or so and blow into the exhaust area with short bursts. That will clear the dust. Also, blow into the ports and any grilled intake the same way.
Next google 3 programs.

First google “Hitman” virus remover. Its free install and run it chick the but for one-time use and put in your email address when asked to activate it. Let me know what it finds

Next download these two programs.

1: TFC. Temp file cleaner. It's free.
2 : Find and download CCleaner free

Run all three of these programs in the order i listed them

If you don't see an improvement after thus us done then your computer is toast but most likely it will run much better afterwards.
This one on me. Enjoy.
At a computer tech / IT guy I’ll say this you give... (show quote)


I think you should do this first unless you are set on buying a new one. Computers have thermal protection built in and if they reach their max operating temp will throttle back their speed to keep from over heating. Keep it clean and it will always perform it's best.
Go to
Feb 7, 2018 10:49:56   #
Catahoula Leopard Dog. I picked my Simon up at the shelter. They are scent dogs, very smart and not afraid of anything. I live in the mountains so I needed one that could handle Mountain lions and bears. He has tree'd momma bear and cub and raccoons. We have not met the lion yet nor do I wish to.
Loves the snow and water.
He is hyper and needs lots of attention but he does mind very well and will not chase unless I allow him to.
They are bred to run through the swamps of Louisiana.
I have had labs and retrievers in the past and he will go where they won't.
At 60 pounds he's small enough to ride with me and my wife in the truck, sleep in our bed and sit on the couch. Big enough not to be considered a snack.
His hearing is awesome as well. Listens for gophers and attempts to dig them up.
As far as speed. He caught 3 blue bellied lizards last summer and I seen many more around the house with with short tails, caught mice and can pace a jack rabbit but not catch it. When he is chasing rabbits it's like watching the road runner cartoon.
He only barks when he has something cornered like a chipmunk, someone shows up or the bear is sitting in my truck. Mostly he is quit.
He also gets along with other dogs somewhat. Mostly it's his style of play the gets on others nervs.
Check them out and see if they fit what you are looking for.
Go to
Dec 31, 2017 15:25:05   #
Curious about this anti-flicker mode. I am not even a canon owner but from what I was reading on this, if the anti-flicker mode was activated and the camera overrides the shutter speed would they not have the same problem with shutter speed as the OP described. Is it possible the anti flicker mode added to the shutter problem to begin with? How would you deal with this problem?
Page 179 & 418 in the owners manual mentions this.
Go to
Dec 31, 2017 08:49:00   #
I read through the manual since I know nothing about Canon features. Page 418 at the very bottom states that if the use of anti-flicker is used it will ignore your shutter settings. If I am reading this correctly the Image priority settings are causing this issue.

Hope that helps a bit
Have a great day
Go to
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.