pounder35 wrote:
I didn't realize God (as you see yourself) was also an attorney. So sue me. There is no defamation of character as you have none. You just referred to yourself as "twice as intelligent and infinitely more knowledgeable" than some of the members who have posted here. Again you show a superiority complex but have nothing to show. Give up PeeN. You embarrass yourself on every thread.
Learn the difference between superiority complex and superiority. Vis a vis you and the busiest righties here, it is the latter, and that is not arrogant at all. Several of you combined do not know what I do, and your combined intellectual firepower is far exceeded by a rock-'em-sock-'em robot.
With your stupidity comes ignorance. You think you can embarrass me by referring to me as a god, but you are only revealing your spectacular lack of education. Both references to gods in my poetic response to a request to regale people with my brilliance were borrowed from literature.
The first was Nero's quote by Tacitus, "I am no man, and I am everyman, therefore I must be a god." Only a mindless, ignorant little twit like you would think or pretend that comparing oneself to Nero was anything, but self effacement.
The other reference was to a great American short story/essay, "The Lantern Bearers" by Robert Louis Stephenson. God with a muckrake, a phrase from that is very similar to "children of a lesser god;" an analogy of one's diminished importance. It went right over your sickeningly stupid head that a muckrake is not the tool of a real god.
The Lantern Bearers went right over your head in high school, of course, because you were as dull then as you are now. When your class had to read it, you spaced over it, because it was "long-winded." Without doubt, that is what you thought about "The All Gold Canyon," CATCHER IN THE RYE, and everything else over two sentences long. You are showing now how intellectually impoverished you are; any mention to literature, history, science, utterly alludes you. You would never notice it if one of my poems parodied those of Lawrence Ferlinghetti, because a dullard like you would be bored by him; so bored you have no idea who he is, let alone what was his contribution to literature. Nor do you care, because that is boring at least to an idiot like you.
Let us get rid of your excuse that any of this is due to my arrogance. It is no accomplishment to be intellectually superior to you. Innumerable rightists here are vastly superior to you, as well. Croce, for example, unscrupulous twit that he is, having posted several lies about me on UHH, he nevertheless, unlike you, shows signs of an education. I made reference to a character from a Shakespearean play, and he recognized it. Even if in the event he had to look it up, at least he knew where to look. You don't. You are totally dim and vacuous. Claiming intellectual superiority over you is not arrogance, but a modest assertion, as even a rhesus monkey is superior to you. So is an amoeba.
Go ahead, post your stupid response. Every word you write proves my point. It must really hurt to be so dull.