Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PES
Page: 1 2 next>>
Mar 11, 2013 22:39:36   #
I am experimenting with macro photography this week-end and was thinking about a macro rail. Any thoughts or suggestions.
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 07:25:20   #
ok...I don't have PSE but I do have CS5. I have been trying to print a picture to 4x6 and it ends up being 5.4x4. When I tell it to print without borders it crops the picture which looses the composition. I do have a SLR...did I understand it is in the camera settings (ratio) and what does that mean.
Go to
Mar 25, 2012 21:16:57   #
designpro wrote:
Understanding Dynamic Range...

One of the most incredible things about your eyes is the range of light they can see in.

When your eyes are completely adjusted to the dark they can detect a single photon of light. You can take those same set of eyes into bright day light and completely focus on details on brightly lit objects.

Your eyes are designed to see a huge range from dark to light all at one time. This is referred to as Dynamic Range and your eye has a dynamic range of around 18 to 20 stops worth of light. On the other hand, a digital camera has the dynamic range of about 10 to 12 stops of light and maybe even up to 14 if you're lucky.

What does this mean and why is this so important to remember...well, your eye can see almost double the range of light to dark that your camera can capture. Just because a scene looks a certain way to your eye, that doesn't mean your camera will be able to capture it!

For example, if you were standing under a grove of shade trees on a bright sunny day and there was a large opening in the trees canopy above with ample sky and sun light shining through, my eyes would have no trouble seeing detail from beneath the shaded trees to the bright sky above.

Now when I point my camera at the scene and take the shot, you will end up with a very dark exposure from beneath the trees but the sky will be bright!

Why?
Your camera does not have the dynamic range required to capture the whole scene the way your eyes were seeing it. By default your camera will meter the scene to preserve the bright areas exposing for the sky and leaving the rest of the scene plunged in darkness so, you over expose to brighten the scene beneath the trees but now, the sky is over exposed with no details and blown out to complete white.

Conclusion, there's no way you can shoot this type of scene and capture the Full Dynamic Range that you can see with your eyes. When your in this type of setting you'll have to decide if it's the shadows or the highlights that's more important and expose accordantly.

Expectation of a scene based on what your eyes see will lead to as many bad photos as technical skill.

You see a scene, you capture the photo and you expect the photo to look like the scene because it looked fine to your eye.

Learn to recognize a scene that has more dynamic range than your camera can capture then make the appropriate exposure adjustments.

End...
Understanding Dynamic Range... br br One of the m... (show quote)


so where does spot metering come in.
Go to
Feb 25, 2012 07:54:32   #
love the picture
Go to
Feb 25, 2012 07:53:35   #
I am going to the braves training game with d7000. will use 105-300.
Go to
Feb 22, 2012 07:06:08   #
les2297 wrote:
PES wrote:
TrishV wrote:
Would love to know how you can get CS for that price - I would buy that in a flash, great programme but too expensive for me at the regular price.


Adobe sent the offer because I have elements.


Last March Adobe sent me an e-mail offering CS5 for $299, valid for 2 weeks. I understood it was because I was a registered user of Elements 3, 5 and 8. I picked it up 'cause as a non-student I felt I would never see that price again :-)


So did you find it difficult to adjust to? Do you use it often? Do you regret the purchase?
Go to
Feb 22, 2012 06:59:07   #
docrob wrote:
PES wrote:
Lightroom is on sale for $135 until March 5, however I have a special offer to also purchase Photoshop CS5 for $299 which is a great price. I do not have a preference. I understand PS is difficult but has alot of features. Can anyone tell me why I should not purchase PS or visa versa


if you drink diet coke buy it if you do not then don't


Interesting perspective...but what if I never tried Diet coke, I might like it.
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 21:40:08   #
Herbnapa wrote:
I think you should provide some information about what you want to be able to do and your experience level. How much time do you want to have to put into it.


I really dont like to sit behind a computer to change photos, but sometimes I find it necessary. Also, I would like to be more artistic and get away from stock shots. I dont think I can teach myself and I will need a class or two so that I dont get frustrated. Time....as much as I need on my schedule.
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 21:25:33   #
TrishV wrote:
Would love to know how you can get CS for that price - I would buy that in a flash, great programme but too expensive for me at the regular price.


Adobe sent the offer because I have elements.
Go to
Feb 21, 2012 08:21:40   #
strictlyflorida wrote:
I have both. I found that Lightroom gives me more ability to set up folders, collections and catalogs to organize my photos into areas that interest me and my buyers. CS5 however, I use to give that photo that extra "tweek" it needs to make it a really great photo. You can move photos back and forth between the two which I find very helpful.


So if I have elements...and Nikon Transfer (that seems to organize the pictures) I think CS5 is the next step and skip lightroom. Will I miss anything in lightroom that I have to have?
Go to
Feb 20, 2012 07:59:02   #
Lightroom is on sale for $135 until March 5, however I have a special offer to also purchase Photoshop CS5 for $299 which is a great price. I do not have a preference. I understand PS is difficult but has alot of features. Can anyone tell me why I should not purchase PS or visa versa
Go to
Feb 10, 2012 19:43:23   #
why do you think they are not very good?
Go to
Feb 10, 2012 19:36:19   #
You guys are great...thanks I will check it out.
Go to
Feb 10, 2012 15:57:48   #
interesting..the lens protector was $60.00 and the lens >$500 from Nikon. In some circles that would be considered cheap...I thought it was middle of the road. I will keep trying and see
Go to
Feb 8, 2012 19:06:14   #
thanks...will try again
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.