It's hell if you do, hell if you don't. Keeping the fence makes the barn and middle area very small and
kind of unimportant -- leaving the foreground fence and the clouds the primary items. Thus, the middle
of the photo seems wasted. By eliminating the fence and zooming in, you make the barn etc. and the
striking clouds the major elements. But the foreground fence coupled with the clouds are very attractive.
Joe: Am using a Canon rebel eos and since I do mostly travel photos I have gravitated to a 18-205 Canon is
Canon eos usually with a 36-205 zoom IS lens.
You guys are awesome. Many thanks. I now have my info work cut out for me, but because of you
I have some good directions to use.
After too many years of just shooting jpeg and fussing with the images with the program
offered in my IMac. I'm thinking I want to take the leap into programs such as Photoshop
or Lightroom. But since I am a novice, and not sure just how deep I want to get into this,
I sure could use some source of info that might help me decide into which program to jump.
Are there any good magazine articles or online help for us beginners?
Thanks- i’ll Give that a try
I have a IMac desktop with the new Photo system that goes with the new Sierra operating system. In IPhoto, I could find the size of photos and albums.
But in the new Photo system, I cannot find that info. I want to put albums on a flash drive and need to know how much capacity I need. Thanks.
For travel, a compact outfit -- Rebel with 18-200 -- works for me. I am on the go and seldom stop long enuf to use a tripod.
I have a Canon Rebel -- 5/6 years old -- with 18-50, 70-300 and 18-200 lenses. Am considering upgrading the body but wondering
if I should consider mirrorless and if so, will my present lenses work with mirrorless.
I've been using a Canon Rebel XSI with Canon 18-200 IS lens as my main travel-photo outfit for the past 6-7 years with good results. Would like to upgrade to get better low-light results. Rebel XSI has maximum ISO of 1600. On the other hand, I'm finding the outfit a bit more cumbersome on the road and trails that I'd like. Am told that some of the new mirror-less cameras are smaller but have the same quality, or better, then my outfit. Can anyone suggest an alternative? Would like to keep in the $1,000-or-under range.
Great photo with two uses. Crop for nice feeling of face; back to show circumstance for use as travel photo
Great ideas. Many thanks. You've given me lots to chew on. Sounds like a "bridge" version is what likely will fill my needs. What's the advantage or disadvantage of mirrorless?
I've used a Canon Rebel SLR with normal and telephoto lenses for ten years with good success. But recently I've
noticed a lack of interest in lugging this package on more strenuous trips. Am thinking purchase of a smaller,
lighter, but high-quality camera might be in order. I have not followed what the industry is offering today in
the way of such cameras. Price range of $750-$1,200. Any advice would be appreciated. My photo interest
is travel, with people and scenery with need for some telephoto.