Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Posts for: focuspuller
Jul 10, 2017 21:29:55 #
Oh please stop, you guys are so funny, my sides are splitting. Such clever wit, you MUST be what, 9th graders? So awesome to make beaver jokes in an allegedly photography forum obviously with no female members, but why should you clever guys even care...you're SO FUNNY. Keep it up, guys, keeping the UGLY in Ugly Hedgehog.
Jul 5, 2017 18:21:24 #
usken65 wrote:
You need to get over yourself. Nobody is trying to steal your pictures!!!!
Are you a forum moderator? Or just a self-appointed scold? Your comment is rude, and ignorant. Have a nice day.
Jun 20, 2017 13:51:29 #
nikonwaddy wrote:
Great shots. I love your way with keeping her skin tones real. Beautiful model, but I would have asked her to smile. Just to few smiles in this ailing world.
Thanks for commenting. For these I asked for sultry. She delivered.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Jun 19, 2017 22:47:46 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Focus, this is a very beautiful image of a very be... (show quote)
Thanks for the comments. Noted.
Jun 13, 2017 17:12:48 #
Looks like the topic discussing the TOU has been deleted.
Jun 13, 2017 16:45:06 #
bdk wrote:
also an NRA member for 8 years, I see nothing wrong with the image.
I love the back lit hair also.
I love the back lit hair also.
When I joined the NRA, it was all about firearm training and safety. In later years it became an organization for other interests. Maybe you missed the training and safety part.
Jun 13, 2017 16:15:40 #
Just my opinion, but posting degraded, lo-rez, heavily watermarked, inferior pics to a photography website to avoid the likelihood of the work being appropriated by the website defeats the purpose of posting in the first place. For me, I post for constructive criticism of my work. How that can happen with seriously inferior photos is beyond me.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Jun 13, 2017 11:13:54 #
MichaelH wrote:
https://www.google.com/webhp ::: https://www.w... (show quote)
Yeah, it surely wouldn't work in the examples you give. Since you do not own Google, WikiPedia, and Flickr (taking a wild guess here), you do not have anything to license, so your analogy is not apt. A link to photos you own MAY be interpreted to fall within the extremely broad claims of the UHH TOU. Like I said, I am not a lawyer, only advising to "be careful."
Jun 12, 2017 22:33:42 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
A model just gave me a suggestion: "Why don't you just post your worst photos?" Another idea, as posted above, is the idea of posting a link to photo hosted off UH.
"...any communication between Visitor and Website is deemed a submission."
Not a lawyer but I would be careful about posting a link, which is considered a "submission", license of which you have granted to the website.
Jun 12, 2017 19:13:29 #
In all fairness, the TOU is plain as day. I am guilty of not checking before posting, so I cannot complain except to not post a photo again, which is shame. Kind of defeats one of the purposes of the site.
Jun 12, 2017 18:32:59 #
denebuff wrote:
The gun is a prop made of plastic.
With all due respect, that is NOT an excuse. I am a lifelong member of the NRA and that is an irresponsible image. Sorry, but it's the image that matters. If you pose adult models who LOOK underage and commit sex acts, you are guilty of child pornography, a very serious crime. Get the concept? Other than that, nice shot.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jun 12, 2017 18:23:12 #
dat2ra wrote:
How does that work with Adobe Stock? If someone pays to download a photo, can they then use it as they see fit for as long as they want, including re-selling it?
I don't know. Check the Adobe Stock TOU. Absent something specifically granted, I would think not, but I am not a lawyer. As long as your copyright metadata is preserved, you are clearly the owner, I would think.
Jun 12, 2017 18:06:17 #
dat2ra wrote:
I agree completely. I was not aware that UHH owned the rights to submissions. As I understand it, a photographer retains the copyright even if a photo is published in a book or magazine. I have published photos and have given permission to the publisher to do so. I did not sign away my rights. Any legal types here?
To be clear, I believe the photographer retains the copyright, but by submitting to the website you are granting a license to the website to use the photo as it sees fit.
Jun 12, 2017 17:17:34 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
presumably the following overly broad clause, whic... (show quote)
That and the website's practice of stripping ownership metadata from the thumbnails, though not the downloaded files.
Jun 12, 2017 16:47:16 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
what's the issue with TOU? Are you talking about TOU and ugly hedgehog? Or your agreement with the beautiful model?
The website TOU concerning submissions.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.