Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: fedup
Page: 1 2 next>>
Mar 1, 2020 13:21:12   #
Glad to help
Go to
Mar 1, 2020 11:49:40   #
Have a look at this if your camera has an electonic shutter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_shutter
Go to
Jan 29, 2020 16:48:07   #
Pictures to Exe.
Go to
Mar 3, 2019 14:51:22   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
You are mis-understanding the feature and/or confusing megapixels with megabytes. As a couple of folks have already pointed out, the number of megapixels does not change.

From my 16 mp Olympus EM10, a jpg using the 2x digital zoom/digital teleconverter is below. You might also be interested to know that the jpgs - regardless of whether I was using the digital zoom or not in that outing - all ranged from just under 6 mb (megabytes, file size) to just over 8.

The raw file is also attached below, hard to see the link hidden between #1 and #3.

.
You are mis-understanding the feature and/or confu... (show quote)


This gets more and more puzzling. Irfanview reports your Jpeg to be 4608*3456 and 15.9 MPx, It reports the ORF file as 3200*2400 7.68 MPx which is not a full sensor sized image.
Also the snip from the manual that you posted states that "the camera saves the center crop".
Go to
Mar 3, 2019 14:35:57   #
User ID wrote:
`



I just tried it. It remains 16MP.
It's not rocket science. It's just
interpolation of the "lost" pixels
to insert new pixels. IOW, it is
NOT simply cropping. It's much
like resampling in PP.

.


Perhaps you would be good enough to post the images. (IOW ???)
Go to
Mar 3, 2019 14:33:45   #
kenArchi wrote:
I see that Olympus and Panasonic does. So do all the new full framers have it also?


Panasonic does not have a digital teleconverter, it does have a feature that crops into the image and reports it as 1.4 or twice the focal length in 35 mm terms which is probably where the confusion is arising. However, as I say all it is doing is cropping into the image.
Go to
Mar 3, 2019 14:29:43   #
User ID wrote:
Curiouser and curiouser ....

Nothing makes any sense. I
never replied anything to you
concerning your eyesight.

.


How very strange or perhaps your comment about the glasses was aimed at someone else and I misunderstood. Ah well never mind.
Go to
Mar 2, 2019 13:56:46   #
tdekany wrote:
But you are still getting a full resolution file, in this case a 16mp shot.


It will be about 4mp in size not 16 since the camera is cropping the middle by a factor of 2.
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 14:34:39   #
tdekany wrote:
To show the quality of the 2x digital converter.


I don't know why some people persist in calling this feature a "digital converter" when all this camera is doing is cropping to the middle of the sensor.
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 13:15:26   #
User ID wrote:
Put on your reading glasses and look again :-)


Sorry User ID but I don't know why you have to be offensive.
There are now two things I don't understand.
One is why you think I need reading glasses to read the post from chapjohn that you quote when I was being curious as to why kenArchi had posted the image of the parrot, and secondly I am still curious as to why kenArchi posted an image of a parrot.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 17:11:12   #
kenArchi wrote:
Here is a sample photo at 1200mm with a Olympus OM-D10 16mpxl, 100-300mm Panasonic lens. Using the 2X digital teleconverter. Handheld f5.6 at 250sec, ISO 1250, spot metering. Overcast sky, late afternoon. Camera 5 axis IS on. Lens IS off. Single shot.


And your point is?
Go to
Jul 13, 2018 14:55:38   #
harolnick wrote:
I love Canon and am happy with my little SX700HS. But as a classical-music reviewer, I frequently have to whip out my camera after a performance (never during, for obvious reasons) to take a curtain call or the last seconds sitting at a piano etc. The stage is always fine, the color can be processed with the usual editing. But--depending on my seat--those faces can be blurred. I can't use a tripod, I attempt the "correct" way to hold the camera, the zoom sometimes works, but those blurs from shaking are troubling. I'm ready to buy a new Canon (if not too expensive) with anti-shaking mechanism, but unsure what to purchase. Any ideas?
I love Canon and am happy with my little SX700HS. ... (show quote)


I find it amazing that people give opinions without reading the original post properly. "The stage is always fine" by that I assume you mean that everything on the stage is sharp? He than goes on to say that the faces are blurred. My opinion would be that given the lighting conditions the camera is choosing a very slow shutter speed and that during this time the people on the stage are moving. The solution would be to increase the shutter speed, however that could be difficult due to the conditions.
Go to
Jul 6, 2018 08:29:28   #
But why spend alot more money on two grips,and increase the size of the camera, why cannot they make a camera which has a decent grip in the first place, as Panasonic do. So probably go with the Pan. G80.
Go to
Jul 5, 2018 06:31:31   #
JD750 wrote:
Ok good. Of course it still begs the question, what got changed that created the problem?

Does that mean your keeping it now?


No I am not keeping it. I find the grip uncomfortable, the strap lugs dig in my finger the way I want to hold it.
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 13:36:41   #
Thanks for the replies.Reset solved the problem. Should have tried that before posting.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.