Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Fee Fee
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 18 next>>
Feb 11, 2014 21:16:04   #
I wish I were in that exact setting, right this moment!!

JoeB wrote:
Thank you Fee Fee.... There are a lot of great photo opportunities here.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 21:08:35   #
Your efforts were well worth it!!! :~)



CHG_CANON wrote:
Thanks rlaugh. You must be south now for the seas on?

Thanks Fee Fee. Although I live 6-blocks from the lake, I drove over so I could move between a few locations and to allow for a quick getaway if the temps proved too cold. I got out of the car and couldn't believe my eyes and set up as fast as possible to catch the sun in the powdery snow.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 21:04:21   #
LoL
Blaster6 wrote:
WOW! Welded steel... that must be heavy.

There is nothing wrong with building your own plane but not only does this guy not have a clue, I don't think he has even met one.

The first problem that should be obvious to everyone is that it keeps falling apart on the ground. I might be concerned this would happen in the air and lead to some problems with directional control.

I guarantee that no weight & balance calcualtions have been done and he has no idea the center of the wieght needs to be near the center of the lift. Thankfully this beast is going to be too heavy to ever get off the ground.

That being said, he did make the news and lived long enough to be famous in his village. Maybe that was the ultimate goal in the first place.
WOW! Welded steel... that must be heavy. br br Th... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 22:15:37   #
Smh, nothing wrong with going after your dream...
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 20:13:50   #
Thanks wedding-guy! That was very helpful and the inserted portrait is very nice. You're right, I must get away from that flash only as a source of light. Glad you liked at least one of my pics. LoL. I most definitely will be making improvements especially with the help of you all who invest some time with me!
Weddingguy wrote:
I really like #5 . . . nice mood, nice light. A smidgen of fill would not hurt, but not really necessary. I'd say this one is a keeper!

On images 1, 2, and 4 the first thing I would suggest is to turn the subjects head more towards the camera. The nose breaking the line of the cheek is considered a no-no.

On images 1-4 the shadows and harsh spectral high lights are a result of the flash being direct, harsh and on-camera. If you don't have a flash cord or remote triggers to get the flash off-camera, then you can swivel it to bounce from a neutral colored wall/ceiling and move the subject so that the light is bouncing back at about a 45 degree angle. If you don't have a neutral colored wall, then it can be reflected from a white sheet, drapes or even a large newspaper taped to a wall. You can even bounce it from an assistant wearing a white shirt . . . anything that will not create a color cast.

There are even some flash modifiers that can give you the effect of an off camera flash, like the Peri-Scoop.
http://youtu.be/JCPhl5jd4rE

With the goal of taking better portraits, I would use the lens that you have for now making sure that it is zoomed out to the full 55mm for the most flattering perspective, and spend a little on some lighting equipment, like a set of remote triggers and an inexpensive, shoot through umbrella. Total cost should be less than $70.00.

Here is an example of a portrait taken with the flash pointing at a far corner of the room where the wall meets the ceiling. (Flash bounced up at a ceiling does not produce nice portrait lighting)

Hope that helps.
I really like #5 . . . nice mood, nice light. A sm... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 14:11:33   #
It's beautiful despite the flaw as in the case of those whom we love!
James Shaw wrote:
A yellow flower with a flaw, not noticed until after PP. Shame.
- Jim
I
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 14:09:56   #
Thanks Pat! I hope you are well. :-D
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 10:10:20   #
Danilo, Leon was referencing the photo that i attached below. I had deleted it by the time you entered the thread. Sorry for the confusion.
Danilo wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why you would say photos two and three are "blown out". I don't see any washed out highlight areas that are lacking in detail. Perhaps you're seeing something I'm not, Leon. The exposures look okay to me...

Previously deleted photo

Go to
Feb 10, 2014 03:08:22   #
Your welcome! I agree, there's 4 vines in my garden and I'm amazed every spring when I notice them showing signs of life!
Treepusher wrote:
Thank you, Fee Fee. Glad you liked it. Bright, cheery large flowers, hard to believe those wilted, brown, dead looking vines will spring to life and bring forth so many beautiful blooms in just a few months.

Thanks for stopping by and taking time to offer a comment!
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 01:26:44   #
Photomacdog wrote:
Taken at the Stanford University Museum
Wow! I really like it! Spooks me a little. It's amazing to think of the skill required for this type of art.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 01:21:10   #
Thanks Jim

jim quist wrote:
a good portrait lens is in the 85-105 range, that goes back to film days. anything less than 85mm will not be flattering to a woman, I saw a photographer using his 400mm sports lens for a portrait, the woman was laying on her stomach at an angle to him, we used a flashlight for some fill...it looked great. sigma and tamron make decent lenses.
I shoot with a canon 1d mk3, which will soon be a back up for the 1dx I am getting ready to order.

take a look at the site strobist.com
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 01:16:39   #
Danilio, that is so encouraging!!
You almost called tears to my eyes. Yes, I will continue to shoot. So many are pushing me because they get a thrill from my creative edge. (if I can pat my back a little) As a gauge, I examine many, many portraits and realize what my work should look like. I want to produce what I'm attracted to. (in terms of quality) I appreciate their excitement but I want to be just as excited and proud of pushing out quality work.

Thanks again for the boost of confidence!

Danilo wrote:
Absolutely, Fee Fee! Pride in your work and always striving to do your best is prime. But...don't let that stop you from trying things that may not work! Those things, of course, you must do on "your own dime" or penny, as the case may be.

You can surely do fabulous portraits at the 55mm setting on the lens you own. Ideal would be 75mm to 85mm. Try to shoot at apertures of f/8.0 or f/11.0, when possible, to gain the most image-quality from your lens. But don't quit shooting because you don't have that perfect lens.

Most important is to learn to "see" what your light (and shadow) areas are doing as you shoot. Notice the shadow from the nose...is it creeping down over the lip? Does it make the nose appear larger than it is? Or the shadow from the forehead...is it putting the eyes in shadow, causing your photo to look dull? The better you become at "seeing the light" the better your photos will become, and more people will want to pay you lots of money to photograph them! And believe me, Fee Fee, some of those people will own cameras that you or I can only dream of! But they need YOU to take the magic picture! :thumbup: :thumbup:
Absolutely, Fee Fee! Pride in your work and alway... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 01:03:31   #
Oh, I understand. (smiling) Thanks Leon.

Leon S wrote:
What Danilo is saying is very correct. Your lighting needs to be spread out more evenly over the subject. That's what I was trying to say when I said blown out. See the reflection on the pair and on her nose and fore head. Try to spread the light around more evenly using whatever you have to do so as Danilo explained. Keep trying.
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 00:37:34   #
Thanks Danilo, that was a great story. I'll try some experimentation.

I'll be taking a workshop class at the end of the month. I currently own an EF-S 18-55mm. I know that's way below what I should have for portraits. However, I'm a beginner and wasn't sure as to how serious I would become. I now realize how much I totally enjoy it. Besides that, people are starting to ask me to take their photos. If I agree, naturally I want to do a great job with the best that I can afford. I turned down work a few times and figured I had better get to studying to perfect things.

Thanks again.

Danilo wrote:
You didn't tell us what lens you already have, Fee Fee. You obviously have a wonderful imagination, and that can be your most important photographic accessory.
I used to be partners in a photo studio in Wisconsin. We had the largest camera-room in the whole state jammed with 10's of thousands of $$$ worth of studio strobe-lighting. And yet I would constantly find myself making reflectors of various shapes and sizes out of cardboard, tinfoil and white paint, and devising ways of positioning them both in my photos and out of them. Made me wonder why we spent all the $$$.

I needed a refection the shape of a crescent-moon for a photo of a saxophone one time...out came the cardboard and scissors, some glue and tinfoil, I hung it from a lightstand so I could see the reflection in the horn! Turned out great!

I would always use larger, usually white, reflectors to "bounce" the lights from to create softer shadows. The reflector is much more important than the light itself.

Any lens that allows you to operate from about 6-8 feet away is going to be great, even if it's not the sharpest lens in town. My message to you is: Spend time, not money. Shoot, shoot, shoot! :thumbup: :thumbup:
You didn't tell us what lens you already have, Fee... (show quote)


:lol: :lol:
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 00:07:27   #
Leon S wrote:
I actually like the first picture. the second and the third is blown out. the shots would be better if you took them further away and used a defuser on your flash. Move back a little and focus on the eyes more.


Thank you. The blown out specimens are cropped that way to cut out some distracting background. Perhaps I may just delete them so as not to explain this repeatedly. I very much appreciate your help. :thumbup:
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 18 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.