Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: btbg
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 609 next>>
May 1, 2024 10:52:14   #
jcboy3 wrote:
Because he didn't break any laws.


He lied to congress. That is against the law.
Go to
Apr 28, 2024 15:23:18   #
Triple G wrote:
We definitely agree on the threats and harassment. In their own best interest, Universities need to set up protest zones.


That would help. They also should not cancel classes.
Go to
Apr 28, 2024 14:59:42   #
Triple G wrote:
The right to assembly is a guaranteed right. Can it be infringed by university, local, state, and federal laws? Yes, just like gun ownership rights, freedom of speech, freedom to vote, etc. I still believe that the history of our nation favors right to assembly on college campuses subject to the laws governing them.


https://www.thefire.org/news/heres-what-students-need-know-about-protesting-campus-right-now

"The ability to distinguish between peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and genuine misconduct is as important now as ever."

https://www.alestlelive.com/news/article_827d47da-f787-11ee-9cd6-f3862e6076ae.html#:~:text=Freedom%20of%20assembly%20on%20college,safety%20of%20the%20campus%20community.
The right to assembly is a guaranteed right. Can ... (show quote)


When they are forcing schools to cancel classes it is no longer peaceful protest.

Protesting is fine. Blocking access for others to get to class is not fine and threatening and harassing those who are not involved is clearly not OK.
Go to
Apr 28, 2024 14:04:15   #
rbtree wrote:
I am going against all logic and sentiment in posting at least one image taken ---with stacked Canon EF 1.4 III AND 2x III Extenders...and..at 1.6 crop factor. (Canon R5, EF 500 f/4 L II + adaptor) I'm too lazy to go back to the original images to see if the 2nd (almost full) image was with the extender stack (don't think so)

I have had great success with extenders..as long as the lens is good--- I've used the same extenders on my Tamron 150-600 G2 with less than good results... but they are good with my 500 and EF 70-200 2.8 II..in the past, they were good with my 300 2.8 II and maybe

The first image is only 700 MB and the next one, being a hard crop, is way less. But, extender skeptics, please DL and enlarge these as much as you'd like. I'm happy enough with the sharpness and resolution of the first image, though the third is clearly better.

Tips for anyone shooting the moon at big magnifications: Use tripod, mirror lock up for DSLR's and go to your intervalometer and shoot at least three shots.. as 10 second delay might not be enough for camera movement to dissipate
I am going against all logic and sentiment in post... (show quote)


Isn't it interesting that the naysayers are telling us to either get closer or use a bigger lens instead of an extender.

Sometimes you just can't get closer and there are very linited choices of bigger lenses. The biggest lens I can find that Nikon makes is an 800 f6.3. Both your shots were 1200mm + and mine were 1120mm. Last I heard to get a good quality lens that big requires at least one tc, and may require stacking tcs.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 18:44:04   #
Triple G wrote:
Hopefully, the latest efforts by Egypt and other countries in the area to create a cease fire agreement and hostage return will bring the temperature down...for awhile at least.


I hope for that as well but am less optimitix than you that it will occur.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 18:22:37   #
Triple G wrote:
There are reports that what Israel calls surgical strikes are not. Students don't want Israel to keep bombing Palestinians and want their schools to remove themselves from anti-Palestinian and pro-Israel funding. I haven't seen mass support for Iran or Hamas except for some extremists. It's not the core of the pro-Palestinian movement

You see it very differently than I do. Israel does not come to the court of public opinion with clean hands.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/s-palestinian-protests-us-rcna143666
There are reports that what Israel calls surgical ... (show quote)


They do not have clean hands in the court of puvlic oppinion, but each time their is a co flict Israel does not start it. The court of public oppinion does not appear to believe that Israel should have the right to defend themselves.

As to surgical strikes or not I bekieve that is their intent. You and I bith know that Hamas hides among civilians so if you try to attack Hamas you get civilians. No one in their right mind should take the Palestinian Authority's word for anything. They are proven liars. Look at the hospital they hit with their own rocket and tried to blame Israel for. Israel has made many mistakes, but defending themswlves aggressively is not one of them.

You are correct that we see things very differently. I understand that you have gone back and looked at some of the history, which most who are condemning Israel have not, and I appreciate that.

Unfortunately I think that in many cases you are looking at the wrong articles and are not going back far enough.

You have cited the Oslo Accords more than once and yes the PLO finally accepted Israels right to exist and then the Palestinians chose an even more radical government. The only Palestinians I really feel sorry for are the small group of Palestinian Christians that have been persecuted by Hamas and now have to endure the attack from Israel as well. If the Palestinians don't want women and children to die all they have to do is stop hiding within the general populace and return the hostages. If they do that Israel will finish destroying all the tunnels and leave. Thats on them.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 18:11:19   #
DennyT wrote:
Antidotal most are not and you know it..


No we don't know that. If they do not believe tjat they shouldn't be associating with them but they are not only associating them they are surrounding the bad apples to make it hard for police to support them. To me and many others that means they are on the same side.

On top of that there have been multiple interviews with some of tje :more moderate" protesters and they refuse to condemn Hamas. If they are condemning Israel and not Hamas then they are siding with Hamas.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 17:02:10   #
DennyT wrote:
That’s not what college students are saying !


The college students are wrong. They are suoporting Hamas and Iran. Whether they know it or not they are suooorting evil.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 16:58:54   #
Triple G wrote:
There is no Palestine without Hamas...the deal with the devil. If Hamas is eradicated, some other terrorist group will fill the void. That could be Hezbollah. Anger, vengeance, terror and killing are all they know since peace has never lasted long. There is no honor nor honesty, so no peace plan will succeed. You can say Palestine is Hamas and say they deserve what they get, but there are too many reasons I can't get there; innocent children, peaceful Palestinians, elderly and a belief that they deserve to be safe in a homeland.

If there is any possible ending of current war, it lies within leadership within Iran, Jordan, Qatar, etc. They know who the financiers and leaders are and where they live.
There is no Palestine without Hamas...the deal wit... (show quote)


Iran won't end the war. They wanted it, they funded it and they trained Hamas.

I don't understand how you can recognize that if Hamas is gone they will get some otjer terrorist group to tale their place and still say theee are innocents involves. They are just teaching thos innocents to hate Israel too.

I really don't know what else Israel was supposted to do. If they.don't go after Hamas the attacks will never end and if they do the world suddenly decides they are the bad guys.

Iran and Hamas are evil. That is just a fact that shiuld enter into the equation, yet our college students are siding with evil that has publicly stated their desire to destroy both Israel and us. It is lunacy no matter how badly you feel for the Palestinian people. The vast majority of them brought this on themselves.

Its not like Israel is targeting women and children. They are targeting Hamas so they are hiding in the middle of women and children.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 11:06:07   #
Triple G wrote:
There are some protestors chanting that, but not all. Just like in the 1960's, police presence on campuses to quell what students believe is free speech is a messy operation.

https://www.thefire.org/news/saying-river-sea-palestine-will-be-free-protected-speech-under-first-amendment

The Hamas attack was certainly barbaric and I condemn it strongly. There is no rationale for any of the killing over property rights. It will never end until that is settled. It's sad, but a terrorist outfit is expected to be conscienceless, but a religious nation state is expected to behave according to national and international norms and laws. The world is beginning to sour on Israeli actions.

South Africa: The Foreign Ministry issued a statement calling for de-escalation and blaming the conflagration on "the continued illegal occupation of Palestine land, continued settlement expansion, desecration of the Al-Aqsa Mosque and Christian holy sites, and ongoing oppression of the Palestinian people". South Africa affirmed its support of a two-state solution.[43] Foreign minister Naledi Pandor was criticized by the South African Jewish Board of deputies for taking a phone call from Hamas ten days after its attack and accused her of taking sides in the conflict. Pandor denied expressing support for Hamas and said that she expressed support for the Palestinian people and discussed aid for the people of Gaza.[44][45] South Africa voted against condemning Hamas at the United Nations.[20] On 6 November, Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, announced a withdrawal of all its diplomats from Israel.[13] On 21 November, the National Assembly passed a motion calling for the closure of the Israeli embassy and the cutting of diplomatic ties until Israel agreed to a cease-fire in Gaza.[46] On 29 December, South Africa submitted the case South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention) to the International Court of Justice arguing that Israel was responsible for a genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.[47]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reactions_to_the_Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war#:~:text=A%20number%20of%20countries%2C%20including,Muslim%20world%20(including%20the%20Axis

I'm afraid there is no peaceful solution. I support self determination and sovereignty for both Israel and Palestine and strongly oppose aggression and attacks from either side.


https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/from-surgical-strikes-to-dumb-bombs-experts-weigh-in-on-israels-methods-in-gaza/1frffb2a0

https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-does-destroying-hamas-mean#:~:text=Israel%20has%20three%20broad%20options,them%20to%20displace%20the%20group.
There are some protestors chanting that, but not a... (show quote)


You are correct about the world comdemning Israel. I just don't get why. Every nation who is condemning them would have attacked just like Israel assuming the same provacation.

If you look at the post you made you will note that South Africa refused to condemn Hamas just like most other nations in the U.N. If everyone on the side of the Palestinians took the positiin you are there might be room for discussion and compromise, but that is not the position being taken. Most refuse to condemn Hamas or even to demand that they return the hostages.

Your previous post from the New York Times admitted that the numbers of dead Palestinians is suspect because of who is providing the data, so it is likely that the number of ci ilians killed is badky inflated. On top of that their nbers do not refkect how many of the dead are actually civilians rather than combatants.

There is another problem with yiur anakysis as well and that is that Hamas is not just a terrorist organization, it is also the duly elected government.

One other important fact that is being ignored. This attack was timed purely to stip the peace treaty that Israel and Saudi Arabia were about to sign.

Regardless of how well intentioned the protesters might be whether they know it or not they are supporting Iran who is clearly an enemy of the U.S. Even assuming Israel has no moral high ground, which I dispute, they are still on the side of a group that regularly chants death to Israel and death to the United States.

You and the protesters do not seem to get that Hamas is the Palestinians.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 10:52:12   #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Is there a link between the campus protests and Soros?


Yes. That is easy to find on line. Just google who is funding the campus protests.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 02:08:32   #
Triple G wrote:
I'm not sure they hold Hamas as blameless, but as protecting Palestinian land (deal with the devil) and seeing Israel as the aggressor against Palestinians and "their" land. College students are idealistic and more emotional than rational.

"College students fairly overwhelmingly want their colleges to Boycott and Divest from corporations that are benefiting Israel's actions in Gaza.

More than 30 states have laws on the books that prohibit any institution receiving state funding from boycotting Israeli businesses.

Those two things are in strong opposition to each other, which means nothing is getting done on the institutional side. Because nothing is getting done and the academic year is getting closer to the end, students are escalating their protests across the US by starting encampments on campus to put further pressure on the administration to do something.

Basically, this doesn't end until the school year ends, and colleges are doing whatever they can to tamp down student action until then, hoping the summer gives them a few months breathing room for everything to blow over."

The New York Times podcast did a pretty good story on Columbia University in New York City.

The universities are juggling (in no particular order) 1) keeping students safe 2) making students feel safe 3) keeping donors/patrons happy 4) keeping politicians off their back 5) allowing protests with as little disruption as possible (sort of self contradictory).

As far as the various students and professors go....
About
This is extremely complicated because there are so many different camps and bad faith actors. Just two quick examples. One can support Palestine's right to exist without supporting and even denouncing Hamas. One can also support Israel existing while being against illegal settlements that foot by foot expand Israel by stealing peoples homes and erasing the possibility of a Palestine state.. You will have extreme views on both ends that try to push people towards different corners. Each extreme end tries to justify their version of a genocide as being justified. Since everyone in the conflict has committed war crimes, it's easy point the finger at the enemy, instead of working on a solution and look inward. An NPR article from January had these statistics.

"Palestinian militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took about 250 hostages back to Gaza."

"Since the war started, 25,105 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, while another 62,681 have been wounded, the Health Ministry said." ( The ministry of health is run by Hamas so the numbers can be a bit suspicious, but Israel won't allow independent journalist so I don't trust them either.)

It's also important to know that Netanyahu who is Israel's prime minister in extremely corrupt and disliked. This war has a wag the dog like aspect, as it delays his trial/s. So an hard right unpopular politician has strong incentives to keep it going. Even though many believe he is responsible at least partially for the war due to his policies in the first place.

TLDR: So with that...Some Pro-Palestinian students/professors want their universities to divest from business and educational interests. Some Pro-Palestinian students/professors are chanting Hamas genocidal chant/slogans and threatening Jewish students. Some pro-Israeli students/professors are trying to equate any criticism of Israel as being anti-semitic. Some Jewish students feel reasonably afraid for their lives. As is often the case, the loudest voices tend to be most extreme and drown out any reasonable discussion.

Meanwhile the universities just want to keep teaching/making that money, and moving students through with as little effort as possible. They have to decide the pros and cons of what will de-escalate or escalate the situation. As in call the cops, or let the protests continue. Those two things are in strong opposition to each other, which means nothing is getting done on the institutional side. Because nothing is getting done and the academic year is getting closer to the end, students are escalating their protests across the US by starting encampments on campus to put further pressure on the administration to do something.

Basically, this doesn't end until the school year ends, and colleges are doing whatever they can to tamp down student action until then, hoping the summer gives them a few months breathing room for everything to blow over.
I'm not sure they hold Hamas as blameless, but as ... (show quote)


It would be easy to end. All universities have to do is make it clear that students can only protest during certain hours and can not threaten other students, which is supposed to already be the rules on most campuses, then kick anyone out of school that does not follow the rules.

Now wouldn't that be simple. The students don't appear to even know what they are saying. How can anyone legitimately consider Israel to be the aggressors when Hamas fired the first shots and did it in an extremely barbaric way including burning people to death, killing infants in microwaves and raping individuals.

Israel has done nothing even remotely comparable. The fact that the college students are sincere does not make them correct. And either they do not know the meaning of what they are chanting or they are part of the problem. "From the river to the sea" is about ending the nation of Israel forever and giving Palestinians all of the land now held by both Palestinians and Israel.

That is not a rationale or just position to take. Those students are flat out wrong, even assuming that Israel is culpable for part of what is happening. I personally do not believe they are. The Palestinians were allies of NAZI Germany and they are still attempting to exterminate Jews. How can any rationale person in the U.S. take that side?
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 02:02:36   #
srg wrote:
Jow? I'll tell you jow. Simply wear your Jamas to bed tonite.


Very funny. I'm aware that I do not type well on a cell phone. My hands are big and the keys are little so I make mistakes. How about instead of ridicule you offer something constructive to the conversation.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 02:01:36   #
Triple G wrote:
Oslo Accords Agreement was supposed to do that.


Yes, but Palestine rejected the Oslo Accords. That was on them.
Go to
Apr 26, 2024 18:04:38   #
Triple G wrote:
If it were just terrorists on their own soil, bomb away. That's not the situation when they've taken over Palestine from which to do their terror. Germany was okay with Jews in Israel and Palestine per the article. There's no peace with Israel when they and Palestine claim the same sovereignty.


It is just terrorists on their own soil. More than 70 percent of the Palestinians voted for Hamas and they still support them, so they are siding with the terrorists. That makes them part of the terrorist problem. The only reason not to just bonb away is because they would still like to rescue the hostages.

The bigger problem that you still choose not to address is that they refuse to acknowledge the right of Israel to exist. How do you negotiate with someone who takes that stance? The Palestinians have never had their own nation, and when Israel was first recognized they had options of places to settle and chose not to take them.

As to Germany being OK with Jews existing their that might be true, but the reason the Palestinians were so eager to ally with Germany was because they wanted to eradicate Jews just like Germany, and tjat is still their wish.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 609 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.