NZBarry wrote:
I have obviously offended you, and I am sorry for that. From a hobbiest photographer like myself, I like to read the story in the photograph. In NZ and in particular New Plymouth where I live, we don't have people wrapped up in blankets and whatever else they are wrapped up in in your photographs, blatantly out in the rain, on the streets, over vents for warmth, etc. The homeless always seem to find shelter of some form or another, under a bridge, or any hidden but dryer refuge, salvation army, church buildings, but generally they do not just lie down in the gutter where they drop, and stay there unhindered by street kids, or arrested or cleaned up by the police. So because I could not identify that this was in fact a person I would not naturally assume that it was. Unfortunately my rendition of the photograph only shows an undistinguished bundle of shadow, with snow and ice over it. After looking at some of your other posts, that show some human element in the bundles, I can assume that this may be in fact a human, and was only asking if this was. The reference to the old photographs from earlier days was only to do with your little quote about f..i..l..m, that I am constantly trying to measure up to with digital. Although the digital is now definitely getting up there, I still love to see some of the old photos, where I believe the quality and detail is not so easily replicated. Maybe your detail was lost in the scanning, but without your added written story, I would not have known what this photograph was saying. Please take it with a grain of salt, this is only my view, I do like some of your other photographs, and did not mean to offend you,
Barry
I have obviously offended you, and I am sorry for ... (
show quote)
No offense taken.
What you've seen in this photo and the others I have posted is not the exception but rather the rule here in Toronto; many of our homeless population will not use the shelters provided for a number of reasons, and so instead simply flop down on the streets or in doorways such as bank vestibules where the ATMs are.
As for the detail in this photo, yes it isn't as clear as in some of the others. The light for this shot was tough with bright white snow at the brightest end and the dark blanket with the person under it in the foreground at the other. I had to tone down the exposure to keep the snow from simply being a white mass, and so ended up with less than the ideal exposure for the person in the foreground.
It would be really comnvenient if I was allowed the do-overs that photographers who shoot non-time-sensitive material have, but unfortunately that isn't the case with PJ and street photography. You get what you get when you get it and if the opportunity isn't taken it is likely gone forever.
I almost always try to include some written explanation to enhance the story, but truly, this is the first time I've had a viewer question exactly what the blanket-covered mass in the fore ground was. I suppose it is a North American phenomenon, for everyone who sees it here knows immediately what they are looking at.