Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: coyotecall
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 19 next>>
May 9, 2020 14:34:58   #
ELNikkor wrote:
and what do you call the Spanish Flu?


I'm with you! "Spanish flu" originated in Kansas at an army base.......now that we're Number One in cases and deaths shouldn't we "own" this new virus? Makes us "great" again.
Go to
May 9, 2020 14:30:39   #
MSW wrote:
there's something just fundamentally wrong with aluminum bats … wouldn't have one in my house … wouldn't even use one on a politician


Hooray! Good to hear some of we "traditionalists" speak up.......wood on leather, only way to go. Sort of like the sound of a Wright Whirlwind engine flying overhead. Nothing tops those sounds.
Oops! Just betrayed my age.
Go to
May 8, 2020 16:44:34   #
rochephoto wrote:
what's a darkroom??????


It's a room widout Delight.
Go to
May 8, 2020 15:33:23   #
Jeffers wrote:
We purposely built a huge fourth bedroom into our house that I anticipated using for a large scale model railroad. I lost interest in the railroad after we moved in and that big room sat mostly unused. About four years ago my wife got into painting and crafts. She asked for the room. it wasn't fun dismantling what train layout I had, but it turns out she uses every inch of that huge room.
Moral: Happy spouse, happy house.


You get an "UP-VOTE" for that one!
Go to
May 8, 2020 14:54:31   #
In the end you will get as many votes "for" as you will "against" from ALL the photographers hanging around here*.....and, in the end, it will be up to you.
*Actually, I think the "dumpers" will outnumber the "keepers".
Give your wife of 50 years a gift......the space. And make some space for yourself in the digital world. We ALL have regrets about letting stuff go.....but let that go too. As we age letting go is a big part of it, there's a lot more breathing space when the clutter of nostalgia is gone.
Go to
May 8, 2020 14:45:08   #
rusty nails wrote:
It is a rare site to see the Atlantic Ocean this flat as a Lake Pond.


We could use a LOT of that right now.
Go to
May 4, 2020 15:29:10   #
dsmeltz wrote:
But she wants FF because she believes that will allow her to make larger prints. That ain't necessarily so. What she wants is not a FF. She wants to make larger prints. Remember she only has $1,000 to work with and no FF lenses. She does landscape, astro and wildlife. Given a $1,000 budget, better lenses that can later be used on a FF is a reasonable suggestion over a FF body to achieve images with detail that will stand up on large prints.


Yeah, I agree. None of the big prints I've done have been shot with a FF. All I experienced when I tried out a FF was a heavier camera.(unless you go with a Sony A7 of course.....but then we're in a different ball game with lenses etc.)
Go to
May 4, 2020 14:39:00   #
Bison Bud wrote:
The move to "Full frame" can be rather controversial and expensive. While a larger sensor is almost always an enhancement, the costs involved can be somewhat restrictive to those of us on a budget. This is especially true about glass and there is a premium that must be paid to get the quality needed to fully take advantage of the FF sensor. Frankly, if your budget allows it, go for the Full Frame system and consider a mirror-less model as well. If not, a crop sensor system is your best bet and there are some fine ones out there. Frankly, there are some real deals out there in the used and refurbished market and someone's previous suggestion of a used or refurbished Canon 80D should fit your budget and serve you quite well. As for the DLSR's, the newer Canon Rebels like the 6Ti, 7Ti, and/or the 77D would also serve you well and can be found at some very attractive prices new, used, or refurbished. As also previously stated, you could then upgrade to FF compatible glass as funds allow and use this premium glass on the crop sensor body until you can afford to move up to a full frame body to complete the FF system. It pretty much boils down to how quickly you want to make the move to FF and how much money your willing to spending at the start. From your initial post, I'd recommend sticking with a crop framed system and you might be quite happy without ever needing the upgrade to full frame. Good luck and good shooting to all.
The move to "Full frame" can be rather c... (show quote)


This is all good advice......I'd go for the 80D 'cause I've shot a lot with it and it's precursor the 70D. BUT! On the advice of my pro-shooter son-in-law I've looked at the Canon RX10-MarkII (Ken Rockwell did a very good review of it). Yes it blows your budget (goes for around $1500) but it's an all-in-one solution, one camera, one lens (25-600 as I recall) and it's a good piece of equipment. Check it out.
Go to
May 4, 2020 14:24:47   #
Elmo55 wrote:
My niece is an accomplished and avid photographer shooting with a Canon T3i Rebel and wants to move up to FF. She lives in a target rich area of NW Montana, and shoots landscapes, wildlife and astro. She wants to be able to make enlargements of those really special shots. Not being a Canon shooter I am not much help for making recommendations. She's thinking used and her budget is $1,000.00 or less. I told her to check out KEH and Adorama. I recommended she start her search with either the EOS 1DS Mark III or the EOS 5D Mark III, which are within her price range on KEH. I would appreciate advice from you Canon shooters that I can share with her. And lastly, will she really gain that much moving to FF over a high end APS-C, seeing that her current glass is for APS-C? She's also looking to add a high dollar telephoto to the FF for wildlife. Thanks for your expert help on this matter. Elmo
My niece is an accomplished and avid photographer ... (show quote)


Given that a FF will require appropriate lens shifts and thus blow the budget, I concur with the idea of the 80D. I shot with that one, and it's older bro. (the 70D) for years, made BIG blow ups, especially on metal, (20x24, 24x30) and got great landscape outcomes. The 80D is a winner!
Go to
Apr 28, 2020 14:39:16   #
bobburk3 wrote:
A friend asked me recently what kind of DSLR he should buy. This is not an easy question to answer. First I would need to know what kind of pictures and what kind of subjects is he planning on shooting. I don't know the answer to that. Of course available dollars play a part too. But then, with changing technology, should he consider a mirrorless camera, the wave of the future.

I would be interested in thoughts on what approach to take to answer this question.


Funny. I just answered this in some detail for a friend of mine.....but I already knew what he was trying to shoot, wildlife....in the distance....from his living room.
So, coming from experience and from a Canon preference I told him to shop for a used 80D (great camera at a fair price) get the 18-135 lens that comes with it (a good all 'round "kit" lens) and then put out the big bucks on the 100-400 "L" telephoto to get great reach and detail. (Later maybe add a wide-angle). He can do all this for close to $2000. (also need two batteries and a charger and a couple of filters as lens protectors. Tripod can come later.)
So that was my advice to a "seeker", but I DID have info. on what he might be going to shoot....oh, add to this he's a backpacker and the 80D only weighs in at 1.6 lbs (don't take the "L" along.)
BUT! as noted, I had information that helped to decide how to go and though I've shot Nikon, Sony, and many others, my own prefs leaned toward Canon stuff and saved him some hunting.
As for waves-of-the-future, not that important in the present. Good photos are the result of good shooting......and then the equipment.
Go to
Apr 6, 2020 15:00:41   #
Butchbmore wrote:
Mockingbird sitting pretty in the AM!!


Here's one in New Mexico


Go to
Apr 6, 2020 14:58:36   #
robertjerl wrote:
From my blind at about 15 feet.
That twig is about the size of a large round toothpick, only a hummer could perch on it without bending or breaking it.

5DIV, 100-400L mk2 @ 400 mm, 1/1000 @ f/8.0, ISO-1600 hand held at 10-12 feet, cloudy bright day

The background is a totally out of focus tan block wall. All PP done in LR Classic cropping and PP just a hair different - Why? - because I felt like it.

Two poses, head angle different and the OOC just for comparison.


Oh! I was looking for a two tun piece of junk made by Dodge.....or GM......or?
Go to
Mar 30, 2020 14:05:32   #
Xmsmn wrote:
blithely ignorant of social distancing.


Obviously a couple of quack pots.
Go to
Mar 29, 2020 14:49:50   #
CamB wrote:
To get rid of the junk. To replace mediocre files with better ones. To rid your files of files with no meaning. To keep the sheer numbers under control. And many more reasons. I don’t need 12 shots of a whale dive. 4 more than tells the story. So eight become history almost everyday during the whale watching season.
...Cam


It's the same in cleaning out a closet.....get RUTHLESS! i.e. Do I REALLY want this one? etc. over and over again. If you think you need more and more "storage" (T-bites etc.) you've probably got too much stuff to begin with.....and no, you will not someday "need" it. How many coyote pics do I really need? How many "cute" deer? How many of my kid(s)......by the way, good question to ask of those hiring a wedding photog. "How many of those shots are you EVER going to look at in a few years?" (Probably ten......max.) Back when we used photo albums to collect our film shots, how many images of Aunt Marge did we keep? (Answer: ONE)
Go to
Mar 20, 2020 15:12:09   #
Photobum wrote:
Sadly, I've come to realize that there are simply some places I will not be able to photograph, despite the natural beauty and calling. Not because I can't afford to get there, and not because they are too remote; no, Ive come to realize that at 70 years old, I'm not as agile as I used to be.

Recently, I have wanted to photograph Little Mashel Falls, just outside of Eatonville, Washington. There are three different trail heads to the 3 waterfalls and all end with a very steep, winding path down into the river canyon as near as I can tell. One misstep and a person no matter the age, they will be resetting bones. So, when I compare the last section of trail with my age and agility, each time I've turned back despite the 2 - 2.5 mile hikes. And yet, I've watched numerous videos of moms, dads, and children at the falls. Perhaps I'm missing something. But until I find out, I'll be looking for another set of falls that is more matched to my comings & goings.
Sadly, I've come to realize that there are simply ... (show quote)


For me at 85 it's not the falling thing, so far I'm pretty stable, it's the endurance. I kept dreaming of one day returning to Keet Seal, a 13 mile (one way) up and down hike (and you've got to pack in your own water along with the other "stuff") because the last time I was there I had a low-to-fair camera and this time I thought I'd take my good one (the Sony) and get marvelous shots. Then I happened to read a piece by someone who had just taken the journey.....and he had captured it...just the way I remembered it......and it was a bitch! Every up and down, every biting fly, every mosquito, every STEP..........! and I figured I'll just buy the shots somebody else has taken and save myself the cursing.
That's when I knew I was 85......NOT 45.
I just took a breath, leaned back in my recliner....and remembered.
Good enough.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 19 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.