pigpen wrote:
I'm not familiar with most of these lenses, they look to be mostly "kit" quality. I do own the 100mm Macro, and I love it. I also own the 7D, and love it. I would get better glass. You don't need to buy "L" to get quality. The canon 40mm f/2.8 is a great lens for $200. The 50mm f/1.4 is a fantastic lens for under $400. The 85mm f/1.8 is super, also under $400. The 300mm L f/4 IS is also great for under $1,500. The 400mm L f/5.6 is super for under $1,200.
You can get a whole lot of glass for $1,900. Are you a pro? Do you need a FF, or want a FF? You will gain some quality with a FF, but you can also gain quality from better glass. You might get 4-6 years out of a body, but you could get 20 out of a nice lens.
Also, not being familiar with these lenses, you may want to check if they are compatible with the 6D.
I'm not familiar with most of these lenses, they l... (
show quote)
the only ones that are compatible are the EF lens, the EFS aren't which I own two of... I'm torn, because I have friends who are photographers who say, buy the camera, but at the same time I want to see if better lens would turn out better photos too.. I've been doing a lot of still life, primarily flowers and plants with some of people at get together's but I'm going to be photographing a friends wedding to... But my interests are mostly macro of still life....