Well said ... I have never been a fan of spectator sports.
The successful advance of Islam (also known as "outer jihad" or usually just as "jihad", whether violent or nonviolent and regardless of what person or entity is doing it) is an ACT OF WAR and is deadly to our entire culture of constitutional freedom, the lives of this and future generations and is an ACT OF WAR because the end result of the successful advance of jihad is the same bloody end result achieved by Islam if the USA had lost an all out war with armed Islamic forces.
Sharia law cultures react appropriately to non-muslims in their cultures because they understand that liberty and Islam are close to being 100% incompatible and can not peacefully coexist when either exists in the culture of the other. This is seen in the 1400 year history of Islamic aggression on Earth and is the direct result of the unreformable doctrine of Islam. On the other hand, the non-muslim cultures that have been erased by Islam usually extended their freedom to followers of the supremist and tyrannical political religion called Islam and thereby allowed the advancement of Islam (i.e., acts of war) that eradicated their non-Islamic cultures.
No...not offensive. But has little useful value to most people. If you are no. 2 in IQ, you can win at whatever by working harder, being better organized, etc.
Does Obama do his jihad so as to benefit only one Islamic sect or is it done over a period of time so as to have an accumulated benefit for all of Islam? Either way it is done at the expense of the freedom of all nonmuslims.
The political power of Donald Trump and its possible transferance to another viable constitutional conservative candidate could be the last hope for the future of the GOP as an opposition party to the Democrat Pafty. That is why rinos and democrats express a dislike for "The Donald".
Islam is a very political supremist religion, designed from Mohammad's arrival in Medina to be a non-reformable religion attractive to men with a savage mentality. It is near 100% hostile to and incomplatible with U.S. constitutional freedom.
How have the muslims gained land mass from tbe day Mohammad left Mecca and arrived in Medina in about 630AD?
Considering that the doctrine of Islam as found in the holy documents of Islam and as practiced and/or believed by orthodox muslims worldwide is a proven threat to the life and culture of all non-muslims.....how provocative is the existence of Islam and the reaction of orthodox muslims to non-muslims who live in the USA and refuse to live in accordance with any part of sharia law?
I am with Trump for the forseeable future. Trump has suceeded because:
(1) He is talking about issues that voters want to hear more candidates talking about.
(2) He is less of a coward in defense of borders and security than other candidates.
(3) His wealth gives the perception that he will not be influenced by donors. In addition to that, he would never need them anyway because he is giving voters more to vote for.
(4) Who else would be more motivated to keep a nuclear bomb from exploding in New York City or anywhere else in the country than Donald Trump?
(5) The elephant in the room being ignored......political power going to Trump is perceived as political power not going to the current RNC.
(6) Voters understand that his objective is not to form a third party but to dominate political thought in the Republican Party. If he leaves the GOP because he is forced out then it all becomes a whole new ball game except the GOP will continue on its suicidal path.
The only replacement I know of for Donald Trump is Bobby Jindal who also loves the USA. He appears to be right on all the issues and if he has a downside, please let me know. I hope he rises in the polls at the expense of the candidates who were for TPA, etc.
Would it be good for the GOP, if the Republican National Committee could influence the state Republican Parties to have runoff elections in the upcoming Republican state party presidential nomination elections? With so many candidates running, I see the lack of a runoff election in all the states as being a bigger problem than before.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/gop-committing-suicide-by-ignoring-winning-issue/#comment-2118672594
Will Trump be the leader that will be elected POTUS and will have the massive support, organization and political power required to reshape the Republican Party into a party that actually has a vision for the continuation of constitutional freedom for generations to conme? (i.e., full filling the need for leadership and organization that I have been posting and commenting about on the net for at least six months!!!)
Should Trump announce something similar to the following as a proposed southern border solution:
On subject of the invasion of the USA by citizens of countries, mostly south of our border, I have been saying for 20 years that a limited number should be allowed to enter each year, be documented, work here for 3-5 years and be returned home (with their wives and "anchor babies" of course). That makes too much sense since that means they would be helping themselves and their native country instead of acting as a growing colonizing force in the USA for ethnic cleansing of the native population here. Workers returning in large numbers with money and no jobs would probably be seen as a revolutionary threat by their home countries; which would actually be good thing to happen to their home countries. Perhaps for this reason and their own protection as well, the returning workers should be returned in groups of 10,000 armed to the teeth and driving humvees (instead of the U.S. feds giving them to ISIS). In addition to the foregoing or as an alternative to the foregoing, I think it would be a big improvement for the good citizens of the home countries if the USA did for the home countries what it has previously done for Germany, Japan and South Korea since the end of WWII. If the home countries don't want to surrender, build the border wall/fence, tighten up all our borders and adopt the laws of Mexico concerning immigration. Previously, this or anything yielding similar results could not have happened because lack of a strong leader and support organization allowed the forces of tyranny to continue to win elections by giving and/or promising to give more free stuff to the voters.
I hereby issue this executive order granting "Pepper" an Obama Grade Pass for imperial offense no. 1.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ktydw9hXAZ4
Put or allow visual and verbal garbage into a susceptible brain of a kid or adult and get evidence of a deranged and warped brain out?....unless there is successful intervention? Were you or someone you know raised in front of a TV or worst with or without parental supervision? Please refrain from posting unjustified speculation a question like this may appear to suggest.
Twardlow wrote:
Close, Bill, but do you think Jesus would call someone a liar?
How about this: "...be at rest, I know you're in perfect health."
That makes the joke, and doesn't demean Jeaus.
It just takes the vicious our of the joke, and that's the part you all like.
It's a joke that does not violate my beliefs. No Christian faith has any rules approaching those of Sharia Law.
.....and Jesus said "settle down, not a chance, I already knew you were a liar and in perfect health too." .... end of joke.
What organization is working to vett the GOP presidential primary candidates, pick the best constitutional conservative and inform voters of the best one to vote for? If this organization does not exist, no amount of money can guarantee a Constitutional Conservative Victory in the GOP presidential primary and a GOP victory in Nov. 2016.