Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: terriv
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Nov 4, 2017 10:09:00   #
I saw this poor little Dahlia while I was winterizing my garden. I thought it might make an intereting macro.


Go to
Nov 4, 2017 07:57:15   #
It looks like only not knowing the correct spelling, I also did not thoougly understand the concept. Thanks for your assistance re the actual bokeh technique
Go to
Nov 2, 2017 18:21:12   #
I have thought a long time before responding. Yes, I managed to mangle the spelling of the technique " Bokeh". I honestly thought either spelling was ok..(maybe lazy on my part re spelling) I was just so eager for your expert help. Instead, I got hate posts. ie "mostly French," and other lengthly comments re my mangling of the word "Bokeh".

Buy hey, was all that hatefull posts helpful. Yes, I asked "Bob", not to respond to my posts.. I have run across Bob in the past, and if there is something something snotty to be said, he says it.!!

But this website is not a a website for English teachers. My post indicates I know what I am doing, just not sure what I was doing wrong, or I guess how to properly spell Bokeh.

I was so eager to seek your expert help, and I was sloppy re checking the spelling.. I received more posts re the incorrect spelling than I did how to correct my settings. SHAME ON YOU!!!

That is it. !! I plan to unjoin from this website. Surely there are more helpful websites.
Go to
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Nov 1, 2017 18:05:44   #
Not sure what a dof calculator app is, but will probably try it.
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 18:04:48   #
Thank you...
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 18:03:45   #
thank you
CHG_CANON wrote:
terriv - this appears to be a much better result than the initial thumbnail posted. You might want to look at adding a DOF calculator to your smartphone. I'd also look at adjusting the aperture / DOF to capture in sharp focus the entire spiney core of the flower with only the flower petals fade away into a blur. Here's where your tripod is a greatly useful tool letting you set-up the shot, lock-down the camera and then experiment by varying the aperture from widest to narrow with a few images at each setting and then analyzing the results on your computer monitor.
terriv - this appears to be a much better result t... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 18:03:23   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
A few tips that would seem unnecessary to a member with a join date from 2013 ....

1. Use quote reply to focus your responds back to a specific member / comment.

2. Spell your words correctly. If don't know how to spell it, google it ...

3. If you want help regarding technique or issues demonstrated by an image, post that image and store the original. Saves time for everyone so there isn't the back n forth on what exposure settings? what lens? what camera? etc?

Finally, if you don't have a wide aperture lens, try one with a longer focal length and shoot from a distance to the subject. Say you have an EF 50 f/1.8 and also a EF‑S 55‑250mm. You might find the EF-S at 250 gives you a better (pleasing) blur @ f/8 than the 50 at f/1.8. It does depend on the subject and situation of course, but this cone flower is one possible situation.
A few tips that would seem unnecessary to a member... (show quote)
Go to
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Nov 1, 2017 12:27:09   #
I am having trouble posting on this site. I just wanted to say I did try using aperature priority with a tripod and was pretty pleased with the results. The picture has a lot to be desired, but it does show the aspects of bokeh photography I was trying to obtain.

I have enclosed the photo and just want to say, thank you for your help.


Go to
Nov 1, 2017 12:10:34   #
oops, clicked to fast, here is my new picture of a bokeh photo.

Again, thank you for your help.


Go to
Nov 1, 2017 12:09:28   #
Thank you very much. I tried using aperature priority - Nikon Micro 85 mm , aperature at 4.0 - ( not a prime lens, and the result - which has much to be desired is at least looks like a bokeh picture.

Again, thank you for your criticism.
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 11:29:01   #
This last remark was actually helpful...
Go to
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Nov 1, 2017 11:28:02   #
Please do not respond to my posts. i consider you a troll and do not appreciate your rude and unhelpful comments.
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 11:23:59   #
Actually, I thought the the spelling was either. I did try a 50 mm lens and stopped down to 1.8 aperture. and used the manual setting. The picture was just blown out. Let me try using the aperature setting with a tripod and see if the results are better.
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 11:21:37   #
Please accept my apologies, this post was sent to another user who I consider a troll and not to you.
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 10:09:53   #
This picture of a cone flower was meant to be boku. But I just could not pull it off. Eneded up with an interesting macro of the cone flowers seed pod .

Either the whole picture was soft or the whole picture was sharp. I was trying to make the seed pod in focus and the petals soft

I tried various lens but no boku effect. I think the room (sun room) was too bright to use a wide open aperature without blowing out the whole photo. .. even with changing ISO and SS.

I would certainly appreciate any assistance to obtaining a boku effect in my photographs.


Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.