Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: IL86
Sep 4, 2014 15:11:48 #
tbohon wrote:
Love these shots, #1 most of all. I know the BA were flying behind the building but at first glance things don't look too promising for the people in the windows :)
I wasn't sure if someone can see those people in the windows. Now I am! Thank you for your comment.
Sep 3, 2014 17:27:47 #
2014 Chicago Air Show, Harbor Point Tower
Aug 21, 2014 21:21:45 #
Chicago Air and Water Show 2014
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Apr 5, 2014 20:21:52 #
Without the tractor? No way! The STORY will be lost. It's a background music of this picture. And as a background it should be blurred. Perfect image. Thank you for sharing.
Mar 23, 2014 22:49:49 #
papayanirvana wrote:
Crimea is 60% russian, 25% ukrainian, 12% tartar... a lot of the Ukrainians and almost all of the tartars didn't vote as a protest.
Washington Post - 82.7 percent of eligible voters in Crimea cast ballots.
the final result was 96.77 percent to rejoin Russia and 2.51 percent against.
Oh, it's not tartars. They are Tatars.
Mar 23, 2014 22:11:03 #
lARRY1 wrote:
No,your wrong. Only about 25 to 30 % support russia in crimea.
In case if you don't know how to google for basic information:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/16/crimea-referendum-polls-open-live
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26598832
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_referendum,_2014
Oct 9, 2013 00:09:29 #
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-59783-1.html
Quick search
Quick search
Sep 4, 2013 23:40:41 #
[quote=ajohnston3]
LOL! I wish it was MY explanation!
I wonder what 'quantifiable data' could be used to see the difference between beautiful and ugly, pleasant and unpleasant? What 'quantifiable data' do people use when they say 'I love you!'... I guess there are a lot of things in our world which are not backed up by quantifiable data. The Rule of Thirds is one of them. We can measure it with our emotions only. The Rule simply tells us - if you follow my recommendations (or know when not to)... you will get more followers on Flicker.
Very nice shot BTW.
IL86 wrote:
Straight to the point on LEFT and RIGHT: br http:/... (show quote)
LOL! I wish it was MY explanation!
I wonder what 'quantifiable data' could be used to see the difference between beautiful and ugly, pleasant and unpleasant? What 'quantifiable data' do people use when they say 'I love you!'... I guess there are a lot of things in our world which are not backed up by quantifiable data. The Rule of Thirds is one of them. We can measure it with our emotions only. The Rule simply tells us - if you follow my recommendations (or know when not to)... you will get more followers on Flicker.
Very nice shot BTW.
Sep 3, 2013 18:36:29 #
Straight to the point on LEFT and RIGHT:
http://users.rider.edu/~suler/photopsy/rulethirds.htm
In an image with a single subject and lots of background or negative space, we might apply the Rule of Thirds by creating twice as much background or negative space as subject. Usually, we would place the subject in the RIGHT third.
Based on how people read, in many cultures the eye moves more naturally from left to right, so the viewer will feel more secure entering the background or space on the left and moving naturally to the subject on the right. The position of the subject will look more grounded.
However, in some shots, we might instead place the subject on the LEFT to create a sense of uneasiness and tension. The eye lands on the subject, trails off into the empty space on the right, and then tries to jump back to the subject, resulting in a shifting feeling.
http://users.rider.edu/~suler/photopsy/rulethirds.htm
In an image with a single subject and lots of background or negative space, we might apply the Rule of Thirds by creating twice as much background or negative space as subject. Usually, we would place the subject in the RIGHT third.
Based on how people read, in many cultures the eye moves more naturally from left to right, so the viewer will feel more secure entering the background or space on the left and moving naturally to the subject on the right. The position of the subject will look more grounded.
However, in some shots, we might instead place the subject on the LEFT to create a sense of uneasiness and tension. The eye lands on the subject, trails off into the empty space on the right, and then tries to jump back to the subject, resulting in a shifting feeling.
Sep 3, 2013 00:21:36 #
Ken Shilkun wrote:
For Design: This cold be improved by moving the coin stack to the upper left of the rule of thirds. That is the most powerful spot because it is the first place someone looks.
For Design: This cold be improved by moving the coin stack to the upper left of the rule of thirds. That is the most powerful spot because it is the first place someone looks.
For Western culture? Left?
Jun 11, 2013 00:09:58 #
toby68 wrote:
What is the best settings for indoor concert pictures?
Depends on your camera-lens combination.
Last weekend I was shooting Chicago Blues Festival with Canon Mark 5DIII with Sigma 120-400mm. I knew I will be at 300-380mm most of the time so I used Tv at 1/320 sec and set ISO to Auto. You may see a few pics I posted, just search for Chicago Blues Festival.
If you provide your camera/lens info you could get more precise advice.
Oh, and don't forget to have fun at the concert! Good luck.
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Jun 10, 2013 23:37:44 #
speters wrote:
You could use a wider focal length and move in closer, if you want to stick to that focal length, but just can't get the DOF you would like, do some fous stacking.
Wider focal length? Move in closer? I guess I miss something. :?:
Jun 10, 2013 23:17:19 #
dstallin wrote:
Out for a little walk this morning..........
Almost got fired today because of you - was viewing the first shot again, again, and again. Damn good!
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 10, 2013 23:03:08 #
brokeweb wrote:
I just want to know your opinion. Which of these photos do you like better? Thanks in advance This IS a test...
Number 1. Clearly defined POI, eye stays on the orange pencil.
On #2 my eyes are constantly moving trying to find POI. What's the right answer? :-)
Jun 10, 2013 14:52:35 #
rpavich wrote:
Very nice...and nice shots too!
I wonder if LR4 and Topaz DeNoise will have different results in noise reduction of these pics. It would be interesting to compare side by side. I have LR4 but no Topaz, maybe will download a trial.
Thank you for your comment. Regards.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.