A recent post about the youth and our vets got me thinking about my Ancestry. I have no children, so there is no one to pass the information on to. Growing up in the 50's and 60's, my interest in what life was like for my parents and grandparents was nil, only interested in playing and what was for diner. I lost my father when I was 12 and my mother when I was 23, My grand parents pass away when I was younger.
As I got older, I began wondering about what life was like for my parents and grandparents.
Now I have questions,
1. What was life like when my parents first got married? How much money did they make and what kind of work did they do?
2. How much did there first house cost?
3. What kind of entertainment did they have? radio, TV, movies
4. What was the cost of Gas for the car and what brand of car did they own?
5. What was it like when they were growing up?

These same question can be used about our Grandparents. Although many on this site, have children, they may not be that interested about the past family history today, In the future they begin to wonder, when it is too late to ask there parents.
May I suggest, that you create a loose leaf note book and start writing down some of your past history of what life was like in your early years and what information you have on your Grandparents.
In years to come, your children will become very grateful.
Just my two cents

Here's a warning that could help you live longer.

"Getting angry – even for just a few minutes – can change the functioning of your blood vessels, which may make heart attacks and strokes more likely. The finding could explain why some people experience these events during emotional outbursts. It comes from a study in young adults who seemed to be in good health. The participants were asked to think about past experiences that made them angry while various aspects of their circulatory health were measured. Perhaps unsurprisingly, none of them had a heart attack or stroke during this process, but they did experience impaired blood vessel functioning that has been linked to such outcomes."
NewScientist

I checked the site and did not get any alarms of malware. Otherwise, I would not have posted it. Still, everyone can agree to respectfully disagree with anything being said on this site. If you Crazyjane second what Basil said, that’s perfectly fine.

What came next in your comment was a superfluous, unnecessary comment that made it personal. You don’t have the right to call me names just because in your naivete’ you disagreed with something I posted. I suggest you work on your level of urbanity before you post anything further. Other than that, I wish you well.

I am not a "proponent of total gun abolishment." It is "abolition," not "abolishment," by the way, so long as we are correcting other people's usage. You are barking up the wrong tree there.

I don't think there are many calling for the abolition of gun ownership. There are many who make the slippery slope argument, saying that any regulations will inevitably lead to gun confiscation and that those advocating or regulations are secretly promoting a gun confiscation agenda.

"Who is taking a absolutist position on the Second Amendment?" you ask. Well, there is the National Association for Gun Rights, for example.

"Accepting NO COMPROMISE on the issue of gun control, NAGR works tirelessly to hold politicians accountable for their anti-gun views, and has made great strides in protecting and preserving the Second Amendment."

https://www.nationalgunrights.org/about-us/key-issues/