Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: memorykeeper
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15 next>>
Jul 20, 2014 21:08:20   #
Ok thanks was wondering bout that. Took a few shots and the oval matches where the face woukd b for a passport yet there are still some marks I cant figure out...
Go to
Jul 19, 2014 12:49:00   #
SharpShooter wrote:
Keeper, I used to shoot the 20d and don't recall anything unusual abut the focus screen.
Maybe I'm not understanding what you are asking.
Do you shoot other Canon cameras Nd find this one unusual?
I think in the 20 you could get different screens, has it been changed out?
What does the oval circle represent? Did you draw that in, or is that and all the dashed line what is unusual?
If all of that is as the screen looks, then yes, it's not normal. Maybe somebody drew that stuff on the screen for the perfect portrait crop or something. Like if you shot senior portraits at schools or passport pics or something like that? ;-)
SS
Keeper, I used to shoot the 20d and don't recall a... (show quote)


Thanks for looking, I only placed red dots over where the focusing points should be for reference purposes but everything else is etched unto the screen itself.Never seen one like it on any camera before but I also suspected it had something to do with holding the camera vertically or like you said for portraits, thanks.
Go to
Jul 19, 2014 11:59:57   #
I am curious if any one here has ever seen this type of focusing screen. It is on a Canon EOS 20D. I shot the pic aiming through the viewfinder and the red dots I put there to show where the focusing points are located on said DSLR.


Go to
Dec 1, 2013 08:34:11   #
rdgreenwood wrote:
My photo friends and I can't agree on the handling of the image below. They feel that the original contains too many distractions; I feel that blurring the background, as they suggest, runs counter to the spirit of street photography. What do you think? In general, where do you think you can go with street photography and post-processing?


I have been thinking about Street Photography lately and pondering all the different theories out there as to how it is supposed to be done. I must disagree with the blurring suggestion; this type of photography aims to picture mostly people in their element, their everyday world. To me it is important for the subject to be in context and to show the surroundings as you originally did in the first photograph. Also, if you blur everything but the subject, then there is no story and you cannot see the decisive moment whether it be a man petting a dog, a woman talking on the phone at a bus stop, etc. Study the masters and see how good your pic is; is not a portrait, it is a scene, a tale of urban chaos tamed by the discerning eye of the photographer. I really like this pic, you did a great job. This pic is a classic, pure and raw and that is how those who came before us, the teachers did it. I suggest you post it on the Facebook page for Street View Photography and see how many likes you get..
Go to
Oct 5, 2013 14:06:33   #
Might be the oldest Protestant church but the first church was San Miguel Chapel built in Santa Fe, New mexico, founded in 1610.
Go to
Sep 27, 2013 08:33:36   #
Singing Swan wrote:
If I could....I'd buy it. Any spirits could stick around as long as my cat doesn't complain.


Agree, cats would actually enjoy the mystery.
Go to
Sep 27, 2013 08:32:34   #
marquis1955 wrote:
Shots of old structures are among my favorites !


Thanks, I just got interested in this type of Photography, wish me luck!
Go to
Sep 27, 2013 08:31:11   #
Beagleman wrote:
Good shot fellow Hoosier! Most of these old houses are gone now.

---Beagleman

Thanks.
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 05:35:20   #
I wonder if anyone would consider buying this old house...and what secrets its walls hide...Residents of the area claimed to have seen a shimmering light moving inside but only on moonless nights... Outside in the yard there is an ancient oak tree, dried up and knurled as if in a grimace of pain; silent witness of unspeakable horrors...?


Go to
Sep 24, 2013 16:54:09   #
asimodulex wrote:
In August, we went to Kenya for 15 days Safari and These pictures were taken at Giraffe Manor in Nairobi, Kenya. What an Experience !!


Fortunate man, congrats!
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 16:45:36   #
rook2c4 wrote:
Concerning digital, I only have Nikon (not counting the compact cameras).

However, for film I have both Nikon and Canon. Which I use depends mostly on the lens I want to use. If it weren't for lens non-compatibility between the two, I'd probably use the Canon most of the time because I like the ergonomics of it better - both shape and weight distribution. The more natural and unobtrusive a camera feels in your hands, the easier it is to compose great shots with I think. True for all cameras.
Concerning digital, I only have Nikon (not countin... (show quote)


Am with you 100%; is the lens that I need that dictates the camera brand but I would say 80% Canon for the same ergonomic reasons and ease of use.
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 16:41:56   #
Hope my first one is free so there will be not as much pressure... I think am too old to be somebody's second... I got serious about Photography after becoming 50 years old. Does anyone use older seconds at all? I mean am fast, see candid shots most of the times before they happen, am comfortable in Manual Mode and the priority ones; I shot a baby shower in the basement of a church with a camera mounted Vivitar 550 FD on manual all the way and did a great job, if I say so myself. I think it will be a lot of fun to be part of a wedding and help record it for posterity...
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 16:35:42   #
Wow, a lot to think about and a lot of people to please or disappoint!
Go to
Sep 20, 2013 17:35:14   #
Hello Hogs, just got a hold of a Quantaray 400mm 1:6.3 with a screw mount but it also came with the means to attach it to my Canon A1. (FD) I have never heard of this lens and never own any Quantaray products. Was hoping perhaps someone has had experience with this lens...and by the way, who makes Quantaray lenses? Haven't been able to find any info at al; thanks in advance.
Go to
Jul 10, 2013 07:36:47   #
Skeezit wrote:
Use wide angle lens. Set to infinity, and largest aperture (f 2.8). 3200 ISO, self timer at 30 seconds. Put on tripod and aim at the sky.


Thanks, am writing this down; this is good stuff! My cameras only go tol 1600 ISO therefore I must do a little math to compensate for that and of course, get out of the city to where there is clearer skies.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.