rdgreenwood wrote:
My photo friends and I can't agree on the handling of the image below. They feel that the original contains too many distractions; I feel that blurring the background, as they suggest, runs counter to the spirit of street photography. What do you think? In general, where do you think you can go with street photography and post-processing?
I have been thinking about Street Photography lately and pondering all the different theories out there as to how it is supposed to be done. I must disagree with the blurring suggestion; this type of photography aims to picture mostly people in their element, their everyday world. To me it is important for the subject to be in context and to show the surroundings as you originally did in the first photograph. Also, if you blur everything but the subject, then there is no story and you cannot see the decisive moment whether it be a man petting a dog, a woman talking on the phone at a bus stop, etc. Study the masters and see how good your pic is; is not a portrait, it is a scene, a tale of urban chaos tamed by the discerning eye of the photographer. I really like this pic, you did a great job. This pic is a classic, pure and raw and that is how those who came before us, the teachers did it. I suggest you post it on the Facebook page for Street View Photography and see how many likes you get..