All of you guys have posted some great shadows. Here is one of my favorites.
Lighthouse in shadows
BBNC wrote:
Andreas Gursky is a well known architect and photographer in Europe, I would say in the class that Frank Lloyd Wright was here. According to Wiki, he does not do any post-processing, instead using what the camera provides.
I think the art is in the photograph's simplicity, but that is just my humble opinion.
It would appear we have three options available to have high dollar photos...become fabulously famous, shoot something so compelling (like that photo of the migrant woman in "Life Magazine" during the Depression), it's hard to ignore, or pass on. Van Gogh was not in demand until after he was gone.
Andreas Gursky is a well known architect and photo... (
show quote)
Hi BBNC,
I reread the Wikipedia for Mr. Gursky and found this under his career:
Career and style
Before the 1990s, Gursky did not digitally manipulate his images.[3] In the years since, Gursky has been frank about his reliance on computers to edit and enhance his pictures, creating an art of spaces larger than the subjects photographed.
Perhaps I wasn't reading the same article as you??
rone wrote:
Sold for 4.3 Million?????????
http://news.yahoo.com/record-photo-sold-auction-set-nyc-182745446.html
Want the real kicker for this photograph? If you google Andreas Gursky, there is an article about this gentlemen. According to the article written at, © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
"The desolate featureless landscape shown in Rhine II is no accident: Gursky explained in an interview that it is his favourite picture: "It says a lot using the most minimal means
for me it is an allegorical picture about the meaning of life and how things are."
In fact the artist carefully digitally removed any intrusive features dog walkers, cyclists, a factory building until it was bleak enough to satisfy him."
Now for all of us that think that changing a photograph in post production is cheating? Apparently, it doesn't bother some.
I had the same thing happen in Ventura, Ca at a Tall Ships exibition and in Yellowstone, Wy this year! I so was so irritated! Lots of rude people in this world any more! Sad, sad, sad!
MWAC wrote:
The winner of the 1st Photo Contest is:
cnd263
http://static.uglyhedgehog.com/upload/2011/10/26/thumb-1319660076639-sunrise2.jpg
What a wonderful, peaceful image!
Thanks to everyone that entered.... cnd263 get's to pick the next theme/topic. Stay tuned.
Congrats! cnd263!! Great shot!
tommy73 wrote:
pictures from bean mt.please critque
I agree with a couple of the people who have commented here on your pictures, which are, absolutely gorgeous. I love the picture of your granddaughter (I think is the young lady). I enjoy the lighting that says more about the time of day...and what a beautiful day it was! The other comment I hadn't thought about was about the fill flash. I'd love to know how that would look. Bottom line...Awesome!
You did a great job on your photos! Especially enjoy the 3rd shot with the two flowers! Thanks for sharing!
Never assume. You are right it speaks volumes.
BBNC wrote:
Time and time again, it has been shown that the mere possession of a license is not proof of one's competence.
I have a friend who has made his living as a professional photographer most of his life. He is not afraid of so-called "professionals" because he knows they will weed themselves out eventually. Professional photography is a tough business, like any other art, and those who don't perform are soon gone by the wayside.
Study and perfect your craft, that will speak for itself.
Time and time again, it has been shown that the me... (
show quote)
Just curious, anyone hear what happened to Michael Jackson with a licensed physician, who was board certified? Licensing means nothing if the protocol isn't going to be followed! Protocol here, knowledge of certain things, such as shutter speed, aperture and ISO, ie and how they work together. Just saying! I don't want to be a real photographer (a "pro" if you will), I just admire photographers who can get the photo shot that they "see in their head." I am retired and would like to know the ins and outs of how to get that shot I "see in my head" so I can be proud of and get enjoyment out of what I did. (No, I don't hear voices to go along with those visions btw) LOL! As several people have pointed out... let the buyer beware. If you don't like what you see...don't hire them. Perhaps that is an area that needs to be shared. During my working years as an R.N., it used to frustrate me when a doctor would refer to his "medical assistant," as his "nurse!" Legally, the only people that can be referred to as a "nurse" is someone who is licensed (an LVN) or an "R.N." Since I had a physician assistant put himself out there to me that he was a doctor in an emergency room situation, I ALWAYS ask what someone's title is. People need to learn the difference. (Not that is always going to make a difference) See my comment about Michael Jackson.
I scrapbook them for family, friends and me. I play with them in photoshop cs3. I've made calendars and photobooks as well. I also have made kaleidoscope pictures to embellish cards and scrapbooks. I have also painted a couple of the photos.
Morin Ryan,
Thank you! My husband said he saw a fish jumping at the bottom of the falls but I didn't. Dang it! Actually that was about a 16 hour drive for us as well. I live in a desert!
Nope, I guess you don't have room for these big dogs.