And you are the master of understatement.

What "real conservative" do you believe todays Republican party would even consider supporting? Honest question.

Don't think I've seen Rac explain that. Have seen Rac claim the threats were jokes.

If he becomes President, I can only pray that you are right. I hope I am paranoid, I fear that I am not.
It isn't that I don't have faith in the constitution, it's that I fear it was written with men of honor in mind. I believe that someone like Trump would come along, and so many in power would enable him, never crossed their minds.

Prior to Jan 6, one could be forbidden for believing what you have expressed. Trump, by himself could not do such a thing. Trump along with sycophants installed at all the safety points, could easily do so. The judicial has no enforcement arm. They can make rulings but if the President ignores them and if no enforcement are stands up in support of the courts, we're sunk.

Details please.

Are you suggesting there was a debate and Biden didn't show up? I think you are mistaken. Are you seriously suggesting that it is unusual for an incumbent president to run unopposed by his own party?

I was curious about the double post. If it was for effect, I thought it made you look silly. If it was in error, maybe I'll criticize when I no longer make errors. Pretty harmless either way, but I was curious.

While I feel I contribute more than you do, there are no bragging rights earned with that. It's more like stepping over a drunk sleeping on the sidewalk and saying "compared to him, I'm doing pretty well".

If you don't think my opinion carries any weight, it may be (probably will be) the only thing we ever have or ever will agree on. Now, go apologize to Dennis for having agreed with me on something. Has being "me too" always been your goal in life?

I really enjoy your posts, but you must have an awful lot of spare time.

Of course he isn't, but he urgently hopes to be someday. That's why anytime Dennis posts something, he can be counted on to say "me too, me too". There is a difference between when you, for whatever reason, have a communication problem, and when the knuckle dragger does (and he frequently does). When I can't understand what you have written (for whatever reason) I know you had something to say, and I'll even ask you if necessary to find out what it is. If Dennis's scribblings are indecipherable, which they frequently are, everyone knows he didn't have anything important to say anyway, so no one cares. Carry on. I hope you say more I agree with, but I wouldn't want you to say anything different than what you believe. When you agree with me, and when you disagree with me, you contribute. Dennis? Not so much. Here comes the fireworks show, so get out the popcorn. Didn't intend to insert myself so much. Probably should have said "one" instead of "me" in most instances.

When did you first quit believing in experts?

If I want to burn insulation off scrap wire in my back yard, and you live down wind, do believe there should be regulations against that, or should you just have the choice as to whether to attempt to filter the air, at your expense, before it enters your house? I'm more than sure you are capable of giving a reasonable response, but I'm guessing you won't. I remember in the early sixties when if one visited So Cal their noses would run, they would cough, and their eyes would burn. Today the number of both people and cars per square mile is greater by powers of ten, this is no longer the case. This was accomplished by regulations. Do you really long for the bad old days?

What was it Feinstein said? Oh yeh, "the doctrine is strong in you".

Not that I doubt your scientific credentials, but it would help in evaluating your rantings if you would list one or two.