Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: jteee
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 19 next>>
Jun 22, 2014 11:53:22   #
Uuglypher wrote:
With 160-170' as ypur focus point for hypefocality, i'd suggest cropping the foreground at about the clse limit of the DOF...about 50 feet.

if you have an iPad or other tablet or a smart phone, there are several good DOF apps that are a snap to use. The one I use is "Simple DoF". If your lens has a built-in DOF scale, of course that's even easier.

Dave

Thanks again Dave. I have a DOF app on my phone, but was out of cell service. I also have a cheat sheet, which is usually in my bag, but of course wasn't. This photography stuff is quite challenging mentally, LOL.
Go to
Jun 22, 2014 10:56:14   #
Uuglypher wrote:
at f/16 with 105mm you should have had a DOF of from about 50' to infinity.
looks like you focused a bit too close. About 160'-170' should have been about right.
Hand-held with 1/20 sec? I'da figured I had no prayer re: sharpness!
I've no doubt that a tripod could have made this an incredible image.

But I sure like the tonal and limited chromatic spectrum of this image! That late light on the front range is magnificent!

Dave


Thanks Dave for the info, very valuable. Lets say I had used the focal point of about 160', would you have then framed the photo differently (eliminating most of the foreground to that 160 point)? And yes, I have kicked myself for not uping the ISO a bit to gain some speed. However, I DO know where this is, and it is within an hours drive from here (I see a redo in my future with tripod in hand, LOL)
Go to
Jun 22, 2014 10:26:05   #
MtnMan wrote:
Very cool.

Next time get closer to the ground. You also can try holding one flower or a small group in front of your lens. Check out Bryan Peterson's "Understanding exposure" for an example of that.

I don't think you want ISO 800 but, depending on the lens zoom setting, maybe a little higher ISO or lower fstop to get a higher shutter speed to ensure no camera shake.


Thanks for your reply. I got as close to the ground as I could (a fence wire was inconveniently at the wrong height - the next strand down was too low and all I could see were flowers, LOL). I have his book and will check that out, thanks. I think shutter speed (or lack thereof) was definitely a problem (tried to go to fast and didn't think everything through well enough).
Go to
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Jun 22, 2014 10:05:37   #
Uuglypher wrote:
Yeah! I'd'a had trouble staying on the road too!
What focal length and shutter time?


Sorry I omitted that. 1/20, 105mm (24-105 f4 lens)
Go to
Jun 22, 2014 09:57:53   #
Driving home from a reception, I came upon this scene. The light was changing really fast, but I slammed on the brakes, jumped out, and was able to fire off 4 frames before the sun disappeared behind a cloud. The first 3 were at f11, and this at f16. Questions for you - what would have been the best focus point (I think that I focused about 1/3 across field)? f16 okay? Had I had more time I would have used a tripod, but that wasn't possible. In retrospect should have boosted the ISO to probably about 800 (shot at 200). Thoughts, critiques?

Field of Yellow

(Download)
Go to
Jun 19, 2014 11:24:02   #
First of all I commend you on the enormous amount of work that you put into these. I think that they are a fabulous opportunity for all of us. Arguments on both sides of the new/old ledger are quite valid. That being said, I favor the "As Is" model. IMHO those of us who CHOOSE to take the challenge to get out there and get a satisfactory shot meeting the particular challenge topic can do so. Those that don't have the same opportunity (for whatever reason) still may participate. In the end, we all get to see what others have interpreted (whether that be during the same time period or times past), and hopefully take something from the best that are selected to use in the future. Sure, it is a contest since there are named "winners", but given the fact that there aren't cash awards on the line, I think that we all should maintain a level of perspective.
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 09:41:40   #
Mary1946 wrote:
A couple of early morning pictures.


Nice shots Mary. Hey did you steal one of my photos, LOL, great minds think alike?

Morning Mist

(Download)
Go to
Jun 15, 2014 11:49:29   #
ace-mt wrote:
Boy, I'm sure enjoying the photos you've been posting Jerry. That pano is impressive. I've never tried one of those, guess I'll have to give it a try.


Hey thanks Tony. Pano's are pretty easy with LR5 and PS. I've found that 4 or more frames works best.
Go to
Jun 15, 2014 11:46:08   #
pgl wrote:
I love your photo's! Good job.

Thanks, much appreciated. It was a great photographic opportunity.
Go to
Jun 14, 2014 15:15:18   #
This was the morning in wait of something to happen with the sunrise. Nice clouds, but that was it.....until we got the call of the "bear".

waiting photographer

(Download)
Go to
Jun 14, 2014 15:13:11   #
MT Shooter wrote:
That turned out pretty nice Jerry.
I took a 4 shot set of the Lake 3 weeks prior to the seminar, but when I went to stitch them, my software had trouble resolving the clouds with the ice line, and even though the shore and clouds looked good, the ice line would never meet up properly, was kind of disappointing actually.

Thanks MT. My 3 shot attempt would only stitch two of the three! Not sure what that was about. Yours seems to work really well with the exception of the ice line. I wonder if it won't align due to the bright white of the ice? Wierd! You sure had great clouds to work with.
Go to
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Jun 14, 2014 14:45:41   #
ace-mt wrote:
Richard and I both liked this pool, so we spent a little time laying on our bellies trying to get the right angle on it. Here is my take.


Tony you took some really nice photos of Norris. Thought you might like this pano attempt. Rich and I were trying to do the panorama thing. I hope his turned out better than this one. Bad light and all, it still shows something. LOL This was four frames. I liked the 3 frame series better, but I couldn't successfully make the pano with the 3.

Yellowstone Lake

Go to
Jun 11, 2014 09:25:10   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Richard asked me to post some of the series I shot of the Osprey bringing a fish back to the nest and the female flying off to enjoy it in peace. Here you go, unedited JPGs straight out of the camera.
Slow connection today because of the thunderstorms, but there will be 4 shots, the last is the best!


Here is my version, you would think that we were standing side by side, LOL. Oh yeah, we were.

off to dinner

(Download)
Go to
Jun 11, 2014 09:20:54   #
ace-mt wrote:
Thought I'd post some of the characters from this adventure

Great candids Tony, thanks.
Go to
Jun 11, 2014 09:19:48   #
Mary1946 wrote:
Great pictures, Tony, of the various members of our group. I see you included the Yellow Bell I was working on when you took the picture of me.


Nice shot Mary, I missed these.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 19 next>>
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.