Bret wrote:
No....not unless you can point me towards a live web cast...I get almost all the tv I watch from the internet.
tsn.ca has live steaming but unfortunately you will have to pay, but for updates on the tournament it is excellent. P.S. this may be a stupid question but how can you tell if your lens can shoot half, quarter or full life size, which would actually be macro. I have an Canon 2.8/f 100mm macro lens, but I know for a fact that it is not a true macro. Why do the call a lens a macro if it is not?
Bret wrote:
Hello Mark and welcome to the UHH. I try and get the best exposure in camera first. Don't hesitate to bump up the iso...400....800....even higher you can get very nice results with a quality lens.
Thanks, are you watching the world junior hockey championships at all, it looks like the Czech's will be playing the U.S, and the winner will play Canada in the semi's.
The first one is fantastic, the others are great.
Hello new member from Calgary Alberta Canada. Could some one voice there opinion on which is better for low noise when it comes to close up photography. If I shoot at ISO 100 hand held but I need ISO 400 to give me a 200 shutter speed to prevent blur from my shaking, is it better to use the 400 ISO to achieve the 200 shutter speed or under expose the photo using ISO 100 and bump up the exposure in Photoshop camera raw. I am shooting in raw format. In other words which one is the less of two evils. Thank you for any input, I have been reading your forum for a month now and have learned a lot.