Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Weddingguy
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 166 next>>
Nov 13, 2018 14:28:17   #
A few of the following statements are not only incorrect but could be confusing to a novice . . .

A typical electronic strobe flash duration is 1/5,000 1/3,000th of a second or a lot faster. For this reason, your camera shutter speed has little NO effect on the exposure until the shutter speed reaches the flash duration . If your shutter speed is 1/100 seconds, and if the flash duration is 1/10,000 seconds, as long as the flash occurs during the 1/100 sec the shutter is opened, the photograph has been taken and all of the light from the flash has been recorded .

Cameras are designed to have an optimal maximum exposure speed for using a strobe. Your 1/60 of a second seems slow but will not change the exposure from the flash . . right? the shutter is usually sync'd for 1/125 or one setting faster The shutter is sync'd with all shutter speeds up to the maximum sync'd speed of usually 1/180th to 1/250th second . Early cameras that used flashbulbs were sometimes sync'd for 1/60 were sync'd at ALL shutter speeds because the flash fired before the shutter opened and lasted until after the shutter closed except for very short shutter speeds , but, not common always . Another difference between flash bulbs and electronic flash is: Because the flash duration of the flash bulb was so long, shutter speeds faster than 1/60th second closed the shutter before all of the light from the bulb was recorded . . . so faster shutter speeds DID affect exposure because not all of the light from the bulb was used.

If your flash is not metering MANUAL FLASH (programmed to give an amount of light and measuring it) then you have to get the guide number for the flash you are using. With a little trial and error, you can calculate an approximate one by taking numerous flash exposures using different aperture openings. You have to do this at several different distances. By picking the best exposed picture and noting the aperture, multiply the distance and the aperture opening and this will be a good guess at the guide number for the flash. You can check this for the different distances and you should end up with a similar guide number. This assumes that your flash is not already automatic and is adjusting the amount of light it flashes. Once a guide number is established it is a matter of dividing the guide number by the distance to get an aperture opening.

This is a bit dependent on the ISO setting, but, inclusion of this gets really complicated. Your ISO should arbitrarily be about 500-1000. Others may have a better value. The ISO being used does not matter as long as it is consistent. Changing the ISO will change the guide number.

The f 5.6 will allow a certain amount of light in. The amount of light is what is reflected off the object by your strobe. The brighter the strobe, the more light that is reflected, and the smaller the aperture that is required. Similarly the closer the object, the more light that is reflected, and the smaller the aperture that is required.
Go to
Nov 13, 2018 12:24:36   #
kenArchi wrote:
As I have said the camera is set at f-5.6 and 1/60 second. All settings are manual.
If I was using settings in auto and TTL I would not be asking this question.
Surely, you being an accomplished and experienced photographer you would know and understand flash photography would be able to help me out?
As I am still on the amerature page.


There are three factors that determine the proper power setting on the flash. Aperture (F/5.6) . . . distance from flash to subject . . . and ISO (the amount of light needed for perfect exposure)
The information you are offering is incomplete.

If you are using the flash in manual mode, the first thing you have to do is determine a GUIDE NUMBER for the flash based on the particular flash unit and the ISO being used. Normally adjusting exposure on manual flash is done by adjusting the aperture . . but of course adjusting any of the three factors will work, just not as accurately or conveniently. Once the guide number is established, it is as simple as dividing the guide number by the distance in feet from the flash to subject to determine F/stop. (Example: Guide number of 115 . . . distance from subject 10 feet would be a setting of F/11)

Hope that is what you were looking for.
Go to
Nov 12, 2018 12:08:13   #
Congratulations to both Kennievans and SoHillGuy . . . both well done!
Go to
Nov 11, 2018 16:01:50   #
Katydid wrote:
I was recently taught that you put the "empty space" in the direction the bird is walking/flying or looking toward. I usually try to do that but not every time.

I am a relative newbie and should not be giving any advice to anyone, just saying . . . .

I really like your picture!


fosgood11 . . . hope you don't mind me playing with your image. Here is what I think Katydid was trying to explain.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 9, 2018 11:28:11   #
I like the creativity of both #2 and #10 . . . but on the technical application skills shown, I have to go with #10! Guess I am a pixel peeper!
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 10:56:27   #
Gdelvecc wrote:
I’m a big band saxophone player and decided to try a high contrast self portrait. Single speedlight/Octobox with help from Lightroom and On1.. Cool huh!!!


Excellent . . . I would definitely use it as my avatar. By the way, I noticed you didn't stand very close to the razor that morning
Go to
Nov 7, 2018 21:03:01   #
JohnnyDW wrote:
Just signed up yesterday and looking forward to gaining new knowledge and getting to know some Ugly Hedgehogs :}
I am located in Vancouver, BC and a log cabin in the North Cascade mountains about 2 hours from the coast.
Over 60 years of shooting at this point.
Wildlife (mostly birds) is my main interest now but I have also done (am doing) website/landscape/architectural photography and photo restoration.

Nikon D750
400mm
f/2.8
1/800


Welcome . . . from a fellow BCer! Nice shots. Great time of the year for eagle shots. You seem to like that 400mm lens.
Go to
Nov 3, 2018 19:27:18   #
rwilson1942 wrote:
On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court fundamentally changed the rules for collection of sales tax by Internet-based retailers. In its decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., the Court effectively stated that individual states can require online sellers to collect state sales tax on their sales.


B&H Now COLLECTS Sales Tax. They have no choice . . . it's the law!
Go to
Nov 2, 2018 19:50:22   #
ronz wrote:
Purchase an adjustable ND filter


What will the ND filter do?
Go to
Nov 2, 2018 16:08:43   #
Golden Rule wrote:
How about aiming a light to the white ceiling directly over the material?


Wonderful idea . . . if the cobwebs are facing the ceiling!
Go to
Nov 2, 2018 15:02:42   #
I don't usually vote when I have one entered . . . but #7 is striking. I wouldn't have reversed it as it goes against the "left to right" rule, but still well done!
Go to
Nov 2, 2018 14:57:27   #
Bill29707 wrote:
This video is from my Trail Camera in the woods near a golf cart trail in Sun City Carolina Lakes in Indian Land, SC. Out of the hundreds of captures here are the most unusual of the group. You will see some of the wildlife that we have around here. This may include deer, raccoons, squirrels, and possums.
Bill

https://youtu.be/cXOj9Z9ou0Q


Excellent . . . also would be interested in what camera you use.
Go to
Nov 2, 2018 14:50:33   #
Golden Rule wrote:
The cobwebs are supposed to be a shiny gold. I used two strobe lights and one flash and tried many different positions for the lighting. This is the best I could get but it did not light up the bottom and the background has uneven lighting with no light hitting the bottom material where the cat sits. Two years ago I tried a couple of softboxes that gave me good lighting of the material but too dark for the cat. Any suggestions on where to set the two strobes and if two softboxes are added, where to set them. And this would be to get a good gold color as well as the cat.
I tried setting the strobes high and tilted down on the sides and front. Then I tried both slightly tilted in front. This shot one strobe was almost pointed at me on the camera right and the other was 45 degree angle slightly tilted down on camera left.
The cobwebs are supposed to be a shiny gold. I use... (show quote)


Your problem is NOT your lighting!!! Shiny metal looks shiny because it reflects. If what it is reflecting is dark . . . it will not look like gold, or in some cases won't even look shiny.

If you either place a large white board/sheet/surface/wall, directly behind the camera parallel with the cobwebs, they will reflect the white surface and voila . . . your cobwebs will look shiny! It might not hurt to have a 2nd flash or other light, lighting the white surface.

Think about how you would light a subject's reflection in a mirror . . . would you light up the mirror or the subject?
Hope that helps.
Go to
Oct 25, 2018 16:39:41   #
karno wrote:
Thank you for looking


LOVE IT!
Go to
Oct 24, 2018 20:21:38   #
Added rule of thirds and a bit of "pop"


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 166 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.