Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: SBW
Page: <<prev 1 ... 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 next>>
Feb 18, 2014 20:48:04   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
Lie Of The Week
Which number lie is this? Easy to lose count with this miscreant.


Go to
Feb 18, 2014 20:38:00   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
A Question.
johnr9999 wrote:
SBW Rixpix is not a true communist. If you read his entries here, you realize he's a blithering idiot. I mean that in the nicest sense. When he posts something you have to take the first letter of his entry and the last letter of his entry and ignore everything from those two points.
Plus, how can anyone force democracy on someone? It's contradictory. If you force them to choose, they may well choose some other form, so democracy would only last one election. And what a grand German name Wellheim. Is that with a W or a V?
SBW Rixpix is not a true communist. If you read h... (show quote)


Well put sir! Thanks for clearing that up for me. For my benefit at least please feel free to interpret anytime he should post anything!
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 19:58:15   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
President Reagan on balancing the budget
wlgoode wrote:
It isn't who is the President. Obama's deportation rate is in record numbers. Its the US's want for pot. Why is it classified with Heroin and LSD? Look at the history of drug prohibition and you'll find purely racial reasons. With alcohol prohibition ending we said "never again" so we did it again. Alcohol is nothing more than another drug.

I believe a case could be made for Mexican refugee status. The US caused drug war is causing families to flee Mexico. Its not all about drug runners. Plus there is a big money reason to keep the illegals coming. Private jails have been built in the AZ desert for those caught. Filling those jails fills the pockets of the Private Prison Industry. The school to prison pipeline and the border to prison pipeline is very big business on the backs of minorities.
It isn't who is the President. Obama's deportatio... (show quote)


Well boo hoo for the minorities. What we have here folks is yet another of the blame America first crowd.
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 19:52:21   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
A Question.
RichieC wrote:
Man o' man.... ok technically we are a: constitutionally limited representative democratic republic.

Like all things our forefathers tried to establish, our government is designed to limit the power of either the majority over the minority or visa versa... designed specifically so a single person could never unilaterally circumvent the law as a "king" typically operated. (hmmm sound like anyone we know?)

However Madison saw it as a democratic Republic, these two terms are most often stated, considered and debated in all their writings... yet they saw the pitfalls in this as well and took measures to limit them.

The world is very lucky to have such a group of brilliant minds during such an early time, in circumstances where they were able to establish such a thing... We all might be North Korea if not for them.

But even so, re-read Churchill's assessment above.
Man o' man.... ok technically we are a: constitut... (show quote)


Wrong again. Keep it simple, which the founders did. We are a Constitutional Republic. Period.
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 19:50:21   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
A Question.
RixPix wrote:
We are not attempting to force democracy we are attempting to seize wealth from the citizens of other countries. It has worked so well here we are expanding the ideas overseas. First we create the illusion of self-rule and initiate a system of taxes. Then after we have established industries the leaders of the industries are forgiven any tax burdens so the entire costs of operating a for-profit economy is laid upon the workers that have no actual say in how the profits are distributed. They are just happy to have food and shelter. The key to this working long-term is to convince a portion of the neediest people that the government is bad so they are in constant opposition against an immovable force and will continually vote against their own best interests when real change is proposed. That my friend is the American Way.
We are not attempting to force democracy we are at... (show quote)


Spoken like a true communist!
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 11:19:08   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
A Question.
singleviking wrote:
If you refer to the USA as simply being a "republic", then you fail to add that it is a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC. It is a "Republic" since it consists of 50 states with their own laws, but also a Democracy as the representative form of federal and state governing body. This has nothing to do with individual political parties.

For the USA to advocate a democratic form of government in other countries instead of chaos or Imperialism or Communism is only natural since it advocates that public vote be the means for law and government and not dictatorship or rule by supreme committee.

Britain has gone the same route for government with it's House of Lords and House of Commons, only your PM is elected by majority in these bodies and not by public vote.

And to set the record straight, in the USA, the Republican and Democratic parties have switched their basic platforms since their inception.
If you refer to the USA as simply being a "re... (show quote)


The United States is a "Constitutional Republic" not a democratic republic.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 21:52:51   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
President Reagan on balancing the budget
dirtpusher wrote:
now how many recessions was under him. lol


Not sure I understand your point. But President Reagan brought us out of the horrible mess that Carter put us in and won the cold war as a bonus.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 21:49:59   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
President Reagan on balancing the budget
wlgoode wrote:
The point is that anyone who knows even elementary economics knows that we have a trickle-up economy. It is an essential aspect of capitalism. Can it be denied that the system has been rigged so it all tricked up and stayed there for the last thirty years?


And your economics are "elementary".
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 21:48:10   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
President Reagan on balancing the budget
dirtpusher wrote:
President Ronald Reagan: Added $1.86 trillion, 186% increase

http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/p/US-Debt-by-President.htm


Per Capita debt under President Reagan increased 68% in EIGHT years. Under obama in just FIVE years so far the per Capita debt has increased 189% and he is not done yet. That is the figure we really need to be worried about.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 21:12:24   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
President Reagan on balancing the budget
ole sarg wrote:
Of course the debt increased more under Reagan than any other president!

One should research what one reads!


Again, you are a filthy liar. Under President Reagan in EIGHT years the national debt increased by approximately 1.5 trillion dollars. Under obama in just FIVE years the debt has increased just under 7.0 trillion dollars.

Tell the truth you lying fool.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 21:02:54   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
President Reagan on balancing the budget
ole sarg wrote:
Of course the debt increased more under Reagan than any other president!

One should research what one reads!


You are a liar.
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 20:45:46   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
Obama And The Debt Ceiling Are Both Full Of Crap
UP-2-IT wrote:
Dave, they aren't happy unless they are crying about something and trashing our government. They simply show their lack of knowledge as to where the real problem lies. It is easier for them to do as the poster has, copy and paste something rather than post an original idea or perhaps they don't have any original thoughts to post.


Since you are so wise. Why don't you tell us all "where the real problems lies"?
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 15:53:40   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
Sarah Palin proved right on death panels
steve03 wrote:
The meaning of consultation- an action or process formally consulting or discussing. This is hardly a death panel and it is not semantics when someone makes up a term in order to deceive. Maybe you think that it is just semantics but a lie is a lie. I your case I'm sure you believe anything from the Tea Party and it is clear you didn't read or understand the fact check link I provided. You people will always follow and believe anything faux News and other Tea Party outlets because you don't have the intellect to think for yourself.
I don't hate Palin (or anybody else for that matter) I think she has great legs but nothing else going on above them.
I don't like this health care plan, and would rather have a single payer plan, but this is what we could get, and whose fault is that? Remember this plain is modeled after the Heritage foundation plan that conservatives proposed to fight Hillary's plan in 1993.
The meaning of consultation- an action or process ... (show quote)


Just what I expected from a rust belt redneck like you. It all boils down to a rude, sexist remark about Governor Plain's legs. You are a loser pal. Go get some help.
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 14:31:36   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
Sarah Palin proved right on death panels
FRENCHY wrote:
Tou are telling everybody that theses liberals are lying ?


Cynthia Tucker of the Atlanta Journal Constitution admits “Death Panels” exist, just a few short years after calling Palin a liar for the same claim.

Liberal rag, Slate, also agrees that death panels are real… and that they are a “GOOD THING”.

Popular liberal economist, Paul Krugman is on board with Slate – “Death panels and sales taxes is how we do this.”



Liberal journalist and author of the anti-Palin book “Game Change” Mark Halperin admits that “Death Panels” are written explicitly into the Obamacare law.

rattnerFormer Vermont Governor and popular socialist Democrat Howard Dean is happy to admit that Death Panels exist.
Tou are telling everybody that theses liberals are... (show quote)


Good that you could explain it to them Frenchy. They appear to be very slow on the uptake!
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 14:28:30   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
Sarah Palin proved right on death panels
steve03 wrote:
Death panels are just a lie made up by Palin.To call a consultation a death panel or taking a quote out of context are typical tactics used by the Tea Party, but this does not make it true.It was the lie of the year http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2009/dec/18/politifact-lie-year-death-panels/


You are the liar and you appear to be illiterate to boot. Go back and read the article you idiot. Governor Palin said that "death panel" might not be the right term. But that is mere semantics. Something like a death panel or care/end of life review board will have to exist for the numbers to work. Even the dems and proponents of the plan admit that. It is there for you to read if you wish to. Again, in a rare moment of candor when they are not lying about it even some of the dems admit to something like a "death panel". I have lived in six other countries, three in Europe and three in Asia. All of them had single payer socialized medical care. They all had something like a death panel. In one country I saw it up close. That is the only way it can work. At then end of the day whether you are for obamacare or against it the whole plan is based on lies to the American people. Lie after lie after lie. If you do not understand that then you cannot possibly understand anything else. Even the simply worded article that was posted.

They are nuking our entire healthcare system. For what? In ten years there will be at least as many uninsured in this country as there are today. That is by the government's own numbers and forecast. It is not about health insurance or health care, it is about control.

What is all the hate against Governor Palin and the Tea Party? What are you people so afraid of? If it were not for organizations and groups like the Tea Party we would not even have a country today. If you do not know that then you do not know our history.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.