Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Chris T
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 912 next>>
Aug 2, 2019 12:37:19   #
n4jee wrote:
Ansel Adams used a black cloth to cover his head and camera.


SOP with ALL View Cameras, Jee ….
Go to
Aug 2, 2019 11:45:48   #
photophile wrote:
I enjoy living in the Cleveland area with it Metroparks and many parks on Lake Erie, also a National park and state parks.


When we first came up to CT from Petersburg, VA, we lived with a family in Woodbury. They later moved to Shaker Heights. We would go and visit them there for a while - seemed like a nice enough area, alright!

Karin … what's the difference between a National Park and a State Park?

New Fairfield, CT (where I am) is the home of Squantz Pond State Park (see above - got a pic of the sign.)

Not sure if I've ever BEEN to a National Park ….
Go to
Aug 2, 2019 11:41:43   #
photophile wrote:
I grew up in Hartford, have family in Newington, East Hampton, and Rocky Hill.


I know Newington fairly well … Berlin Turnpike and all that. Rocky Hill and East Hampton - not so well ….

What made you decide to move to Cleveland, Ohio?
Go to
Aug 2, 2019 11:27:42   #
BebuLamar wrote:
It's not my rig it's my toy.


TOY, huh, Bebu? …. Rig … Toy … Object of Desire … what's the diff?
Go to
Aug 2, 2019 01:27:59   #
MauiMoto wrote:
Ha! That's exactly what I thought. It's still way less than I've spent building cars, four wheelers and motorcycles, and it appears that lenses hold there resale value longer. Six grand for a turbocharger and the blue book value is still going down.


Yes, that's true, Moto … glass is - virtually - unbreakable, and there are so few moving parts, too ….

Quite unlike your turbocharger, or any of your engines …

Unlike the bodies, themselves - which DO go down, every single year, until they acquire "Classic" status!
Go to
Aug 1, 2019 20:13:54   #
MauiMoto wrote:
I didn't choose it but the VA bought me a D7200 with an 18-200mm to get me out of the house more, since I use too enjoy film photography. I got a 35mm f1.8 and 20mm f1.8 for low light. The D7200 noise above 1600 iso is unpleasant for Astrophotography so I bought a D750, on sale, mainly for astro but still use the D7200 at 1600 iso for stacked DSOs. I bought a D7500 because it was on sale and I like the tilt screen but still use the buttons, not in the habit of touching the screen yet.
Hardly use the 18-200mm because it is slow and not very sharp. I got 16-80mm, 24-120mm, 35mm f1.4, 300mm f4, 14-24mm f2.8, 70-200mm, 70-300mm (the ff, afp, vr) and a bunch of 50 1.4s and 1.8s all on sale. You see the recurring theme? I'm worse than a woman with sales, I can only resist it a few times before I fold, internet marketing has my number. 100mm and 200mm macros. Tc-1.4e for the 300mm pf. Few more I can't think of cause I wasn't impressed and don't use much. Oh, like the Tamron 150-600mm g2 and 1.4x tc, the tc requires a - 10 AFFT, I couldn't believe it but I sent it to Tamron with the lens and the D7200 because the tap in numbers were all over the place for the lens and they confirmed it, - 10, for the tc. The Nikkor tc-1.4e is spot on, as all of their lenses. The 300 takes a +1 on the D7500 and this is a light weight balanced combo. I like the D500 and D850 or Z7 and have resisted the sales so far but will probably give in when they are replaced and really go on sale. Already surrendered to the 500pf when I see it on sale, looking like a few years for this one.
I didn't choose it but the VA bought me a D7200 wi... (show quote)


How NICE of the VA to do that for you, Moto … perhaps, now - you can actually BILL them - for your subsequent GAS ATTACK - which they've now caused, by their unfeeling ways …
Go to
Aug 1, 2019 11:19:35   #
photophile wrote:
Lake Erie is easily stirred up by winds since it is not as deep as the other Great Lakes.


Ah, I see. You could always move to Toledo, I guess - huh?
Go to
Aug 1, 2019 11:17:27   #
photophile wrote:
I grew up in Connecticut so enjoy images of it.


Oh, great, Karin … I have plenty more where THAT one came from. Where'd you grow up?
Go to
Aug 1, 2019 11:04:08   #
BebuLamar wrote:
I don't have a rig because rig sounds like tools for the job. I don't have job in photography.


Your rig, Bebu - is your Df ….
Go to
Aug 1, 2019 02:38:55   #
selmslie wrote:
The excuses were mostly in Face-off ... Let's have a shoot-out - shall we? to explain repeatedly why you could not meet your own challenge to come up with, "the one you are so very delighted with - you are considering blowing it up to plaster a wall with it."

Looking at the thumbnails you have posted here we can see why you were reluctant.


Thumbnails definition from Wiki:

Thumbnails are reduced-size versions of pictures or videos, used to help in recognizing and organizing them, serving the same role for images as a normal text index does for words. In the age of digital images, visual search engines and image-organizing programs normally use thumbnails, as do most modern operating systems or desktop environments, such as Microsoft Windows, macOS, KDE (Linux) and GNOME (Linux). On web pages, they also avoid the need to download larger files unnecessarily.

Thumbnails are ideally implemented on web pages as separate, smaller copies of the original image, in part because one purpose of a thumbnail image on a web page is to reduce bandwidth and download time. Some web designers produce thumbnails with HTML or client-side scripting that makes the user's browser shrink the picture, rather than use a smaller copy of the image. This results in no saved bandwidth, and the visual quality of browser resizing is usually less than ideal. Displaying a significant part of the picture instead of the full frame can allow the use of a smaller thumbnail while maintaining recognizability. For example, when thumbnailing a full-body portrait of a person, it may be better to show the face slightly reduced than an indistinct figure. However, this may mislead the viewer about what the image contains, so is more suited to artistic presentations than searching or catalogue browsing.
In 2002, the court in the US case Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corporation ruled that it was fair use for Internet search engines to use thumbnail images to help web users find what they seek.

The word "thumbnail" is a reference to the human thumbnail and alludes to the small size of the image or picture, comparable to the size of the human thumbnail. While the earliest use of the word in this sense dates back to the 17th century, the American Heritage Dictionary of Idioms is reported to have documented that the expression first appears in the mid-19th century to refer to 'a drawing the size of the thumbnail'. The word was then used figuratively, in both noun and adjective form, to refer to anything small or concise, such as a biographical essay. The use of the word "thumbnail" in the specific context of computer images as 'a small graphical representation, as of a larger graphic, a page layout, etc.' appears to have been first used in the 1980s.

Dimensions
The Denver Public Library Digitization and Cataloguing Program produces thumbnails that are 160 pixels in the long dimension.
The California Digital Library Guidelines for Digital Images recommend 150-200 pixels for each dimension.
Picture Australia requires thumbnails to be 150 pixels in the long dimension.
The International Dunhuang Project Standards for Digitization and Image Management specifies a height of 96 pixels at 72 ppi.
DeviantArt automatically produces thumbnails that are maximum 150 pixels in the long dimension.
Flickr automatically produces thumbnails that are a maximum 240 pixels in the long dimension, or smaller 75×75 pixels. It also applies unsharp mask to them.
Picasa automatically produces thumbnails that are a maximum 144 pixels in the long dimension, or 160×160 pixels album thumbnails.
The term vignette is sometimes used to describe an image that is smaller than the original, larger than a thumbnail, but no more than 250 pixels in the long dimension.

Note: there is NOTHING in the above dimensions which correlate with your theory 640x480 images are somehow related to the term - THUMBNAIL!
Go to
Jul 31, 2019 20:37:26   #
photophile wrote:
Thanks Chris!


Hereyago, Karin … here's one almost as colorful as that sky you put up …

Dock in the southwest corner of Ball Pond, in New Fairfield, CT

Dock in the SW corner of Ball Pond, New Fairfield, CT

Go to
Jul 31, 2019 17:08:21   #
photophile wrote:
Bradstreet Landing pier, Rocky River Ohio:


Oh, very nice, Karin … a bit of Rocking and Rolling, there - huh?

Nice to hear back from your piers … er … peers - huh?
Go to
Jul 31, 2019 14:18:47   #
With regard to HOW did I/we - pick our current rigs - the answer to that (at least, as far as the Sony a77 II) is - that I was looking around for a body w/ IBIS, as I don't fully trust the ILIS in conventional DSLRs - since body shake - does NOT seem to be compensated, sufficiently enough, in ILIS based cameras, so that ruled out Nikon and Canon - for the most part. This left Pentax and Sony SLTs - both of which I delved into with varying degrees - Pentax K-50, initially - which, at first - produced the most fantastic images, and with only a 16MP sensor!!! … Now, with the 24MP sensor of the two Sony a77s I have, I've found my stride!!!
Go to
Jul 31, 2019 14:06:59   #
Primary rig, now - is the Sony alpha a77 II w/ a 16-105 DT. Yesterday, I took it out with my Sigma 105 Macro attached - got some extraordinarily good images, with it. My other Go-To camera is a Nikon D5500 with a Sigma 18-250 OS HSM Macro - seems to work well under many different situations. When I plan on working more precisely - I bring out one of my three Canons - either the Rebel T4i w/ 15-85 IS USM, or the EOS 60D w/ Tokina 16.5-135 AT-X, or my Rebel T3 with a Tamron 18-270 VC PZD. Back-up Nikons include the D5300 w/ Sigma 18-200 OS HSM, D7100 w/ 16-85 VR, and D7000 w/ Tokina 16.5-135 AT-X, as well.
Go to
Jul 31, 2019 04:05:45   #
photophile wrote:
Bradstreet Pier, Rocky River Res. and Hinckley Reservation:


Love the pink in the sky on that first one, Karin … has an almost surreal quality about it ….
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 912 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.