Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ORpilot
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 191 next>>
Sep 27, 2023 13:36:13   #
SWADE wrote:
Yes, it was a very cool spot, my kids loved it. We were there in 2014


2017 for me and then we went to the RedWoods
Go to
Sep 27, 2023 13:21:20   #
SWADE wrote:
Directed to ORpilot Very good sir, I was wondering if anyone would notice that the last picture was not from Marquette, Plus you got the right state!


A number of years ago I visited there (Jurassic Park was shot here )


Go to
Sep 27, 2023 11:12:43   #
It's been a long time since I was in Marquette. I was stationed there in the AirForce back in the late 70's. Isn't the last photo California ?
Go to
Sep 27, 2023 10:59:36   #
Definitely a once in a lifetime visit. I lived in Ohio, Michigan, Alaska, and Oregon and only ever saw one once and unfortunately it was nighttime. Lovely cats.
Go to
Sep 26, 2023 15:48:35   #
In BoyScouts we learned: always hike with a buddy. Photos are wonderful.
Go to
Sep 26, 2023 15:45:29   #
very nice shots
Go to
Sep 22, 2023 14:01:20   #
cool
Go to
Sep 20, 2023 17:18:42   #
The new format is harder to look for things or skip things. The new format just looks like everything is displayed as soon as it was submitted without any organization.... New is not always better... which is better a brand new violen made by child labor in China from Alaskan Spruce or a Stradivarius ?
Go to
Sep 18, 2023 12:39:06   #
Your view also depends on the camera you use. Is it full Fram or crop or 4/3.? You should look at Zero-D lenses. They claim no (minimal) distortion. No matter what you use, you still have to be careful with verticals and horizontals. Another option is tilt lenses... I had used a 10-20mm Sigma on a crop sensor APS-C with minimal problems. Also, Most real estate photos are dropped way down in resolution to VGA or they're about so they can be sent on the internet in batches. Therefor you don't need the sharpest thing out there. When printed they are usually done on a 3 color office printer to nothing larger than 8x11 on plain paper. If you are shooting for Home and Garden Magazine, that's a different ball park. It's easier to take the time to shoot correctly than to spend hours trying to correct in the computer. Do your homework and maybe rent a lens first.
Go to
Sep 14, 2023 16:41:48   #
nice shot
Go to
Sep 14, 2023 16:29:59   #
Dust will be your #1 problem. Choosing the right lens will be the #2. As in the photo of all those photographers with long lenses. The moment presents itself you have to be ready. I have had several students that have taken my photography classes and their #1 question is always " do I need a new lens". Unless you are there for Nat Geo. don't even think of hauling around a ton of equipment. All my student took long lens bridge cameras. It didn't matter if they got the Sony RX10iv, Nikon P950 or P1000, or the Panasonic equivalent. They all came back with praises for the bridge cameras. They never missed a shot due to having the wrong lens on the camera. They did not have any dust problems. Bridge cameras are sealed compared to interchangeable lens cameras. No 40 pounds of equipment. Yes they all said that in some cases the fancy equipment people got a slightly better shot. But they, with the bridge camera never missed a shot like the other people did. I say get a bridge camera buy or rent and practice, practice, practice, in a park or somewhere. Having the cameras in your lap and bringing it up to shoot. At all kinds of moving subjects and distances. If you can do that in a split second. You are ready. Remember... your first priority is to enjoy the trip. Memories are always in focus. you don't want to say back at camp..."I missed that because I was fumbling with my camera gear.
Go to
Sep 14, 2023 16:10:19   #
it is like a wedding portrait . A historical visual document of a moment in time.
Go to
Sep 12, 2023 13:34:12   #
Nice job, Mother Nature was good as usual
Go to
Sep 11, 2023 14:04:19   #
Bridges wrote:
I anticipate a lot of white, especially in the glacier areas. A good incident meter reading could be more accurate than in-camera readings. As for the 300, I'm thinking the opposite -- if I leave the much heavier 200-500 at home, I could still get to 630mm using the 300 and a 1.4 on a crop sensor body. From some of the responses I'm getting, around 600mm is enough reach for a trip to Alaska.


I understand. I find it much quicker to use exposure compensation rather than an external light meter. Your Z is mirrorless so leave the exposure meter behind and use the built in Exposure compensation, what you see is what you get. It's a little harder to use on your other camera because you have to go into live view. I'm surprised you don't trust the built in meter. When I lived in Alaska. I rarely found glaciers to be pure white except after a recent snowfall. There is plenty of moraine (dirt and rocks) on the glaciers as well as deep crevasses, which lean towards blue. As always, take a shot, evaluate it, then compensate as needed. Enjoy your trip.., Don't let photography get in the way of enjoying the trip. Memories are always properly exposed.
Go to
Sep 11, 2023 13:55:35   #
markngolf wrote:
I have only three experiences to relate to you:
1. A land/cruise tour of Alaska in 2005 - Carried 40lbs. of photography equipment in a backpack. Loved the experience. Far too much equipment.
2. 2006 land cruise tour of France, Italy and around the boot of the Mediterranean. Wonderful, but far too much equipment.
3. 2018 - River cruise from Prague to Budapest. Fabulous!! Sony RX10 IV. Did not miss any photos. It was the best experience.

Enjoy the trip, Mike!!
Mark


Yes, Yes, 90% of the time for long travel trips I just take my RX10iv and RX100v as backup. I leave the A1 or A9 and 40 lbs of equipment behind. Now if Nation GEO was paying then that is different....
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 191 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.