Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Twardlow
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 1349 next>>
Jan 9, 2019 10:23:38   #
BigWahoo wrote:
They looked like deer in the headlights


They did look as you say, no question.

Trump didn’t look all that good.

But the real story, the sincere threat to the nation is Using The White House, The Oval Office, as a propagand site to lie to the nation and to the world.

Is there no longer such a thing as truth or competence in the Republican Party?
Go to
Jan 9, 2019 10:18:43   #
Cotondog wrote:
Yes, it sure can! LOLOLOL.

However, your picture is incomplete. I have taken the liberty to add to it. No need to thank me. The only thing is, the trump is in a category all by himself (with only his blind supporters to pay homage to him).


This, on the other hand, is truly a sensitive, truthful expression of political reality as it exists is the White House today!

Wonderful Work!!!


;-)
Go to
Jan 9, 2019 10:16:37   #
LWW wrote:
A picture can be worth a million words.


This is merely wistful trash.

Love propaganda much?????
Go to
Jan 9, 2019 10:08:17   #
Pegasus wrote:
It would have been better for them to just not say anything and stay off the air rather than put on the disastrous show they did.

The memes are writing themselves, coming from this picture:


They did look strange. Obviously, they aren’t gifted performers.

On the other hand, they didn’t outright lie to the nation, as someone else did.

Trump himself looked pretty tense. Formal speeches aren’t his forte, as the informal rally speeches are.

But he lied.

Again.

Still.

Is the man mentally incapable of telling the truth? Is there nothing of reality in his life?

Summing up: Trump, big failure; absolutely no constructive effect to his cloud of lies.

Democrats, satire on SNL, expecially the huddling.

Final judgement: Trump totally incapable of telling the truth at any time;

Schumer and Pelosi, humor fodder, not gifted speakers, but holding Trump’s feet to the fire.

When paychecks are missing and tax refunds are questionable, this thing will come to a head, and will end.
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 14:36:34   #
Wrangler wrote:
Are you saying that anyone who disagrees with you is not a rational person? That seems to be narcissistic to me.

You write, "You may disagree with his policies or his politics; that is allowed. But the rest, never." Does that statement make you guilty of your own rule?


So, you are offended by Nardissism? What a change!

Actually you seem to have forgotten how to read, and instead you take to telling me what I feel or what, in your opinion at least, what I mean.

You never win any kewpi dolls that way.

What I said was, no rational person can question Obama’s competence or honesty.

Particularly, if you accept trump, you can’t.

You can argue with his politics or with his policies (if you want to be wrong.)

Repeated surveys by professional historians place Obama at about number ten of the positive list of best presidents.

Trump is one lower than dead last, perhaps two lower.
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 13:14:39   #
Wrangler wrote:
Trump is president because he got elected. We could change the constitution and appoint a president but I would like to know who is the one who will appoint the president.

Of course, that would throw out democracy. Are we ready to do that?


Unclear whether you are replying to my post or not, and if you are, what does your post have to do with mine?
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 13:12:36   #
LWW wrote:
He was elected in 2006, and following a D congress and RINO POTUS things went south ... fast.


from /wikipedia:

(And I quote)

Barack Hussein Obama II (/bəˈrɑːk huːˈseɪn oʊˈbɑːmə/ (About this soundlisten);[1] born August 4, 1961) is an American attorney and politician who served as the 44th president of the United States from 2009 to 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the first African American to be elected to the presidency. He previously served as a senator from Illinois from 2005 to 2008.
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 09:14:27   #
LWW wrote:
The inconvenient truths are:

- The gubmint guaranteed the loans as soon as they had the proper documents.

- The gubmint rescinded Glass-Stegall, allowing commercial banks (INSURED) to buy investment banks (UNINSURED).

- These two acts meant that if the loans went bad the lender kept the profits.

- If the loans went bad the gubmint ate the loss.

- The FDIC insurance collected for over 7 decades we net mostly into the general fund and was spent while absolutely minimal amounts were kept in reserves.

- When the debacle came, the FDIC reserves ran out quickly.

- The banks were bailed out because if the dumb masses figured out what happened there would be gubmint folks hanging from lightposts.

- The dumb masses were sold out, but their party/media masters ordered them to bleat BOOOOSH DID IT!!!!

- They continue to do so to this day.
The inconvenient truths are: br br - The gubmint ... (show quote)


“Deregulation

In 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. The repeal allowed banks to use deposits to invest in derivatives. Bank lobbyists said they needed this change to compete with foreign firms. They promised to only invest in low-risk securities to protect their customers.

The following year, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act exempted credit default swaps and other derivatives from regulations. This federal legislation overruled the state laws that had formerly prohibited this from gambling. It specifically exempted trading in energy derivatives.

Who wrote and advocated for passage of both bills? Texas Senator Phil Gramm, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. He listened to lobbyists from energy company, Enron. His wife, who had formerly held the post of Chairwoman of the Commodities Future Trading Commission, was an Enron board member. Enron was a major contributor to Senator Gramm’s campaigns. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers also lobbied for the bill’s passage.

Enron wanted to engage in derivatives trading using its online futures exchanges. Enron argued that foreign derivatives exchanges were giving overseas firms an unfair competitive advantage. 


https://www.thebalance.com/what-caused-2008-global-financial-crisis-3306176
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 08:21:40   #
LWW wrote:
The inconvenient truths are:

- The gubmint guaranteed the loans as soon as they had the proper documents.

- The gubmint rescinded Glass-Stegall, allowing commercial banks (INSURED) to buy investment banks (UNINSURED).

- These two acts meant that if the loans went bad the lender kept the profits.

- If the loans went bad the gubmint ate the loss.

- The FDIC insurance collected for over 7 decades we net mostly into the general fund and was spent while absolutely minimal amounts were kept in reserves.

- When the debacle came, the FDIC reserves ran out quickly.

- The banks were bailed out because if the dumb masses figured out what happened there would be gubmint folks hanging from lightposts.

- The dumb masses were sold out, but their party/media masters ordered them to bleat BOOOOSH DID IT!!!!

- They continue to do so to this day.
The inconvenient truths are: br br - The gubmint ... (show quote)


Read The Big Short, by Michael Lewis....
Go to
Jan 7, 2019 23:33:45   #
hondo812 wrote:
Just a response to your "over the top" lovenote about Obama.

Of course Obama can be criticized. So can Trump. And so has every president in the last 150 years.

Mr. 57 states wasn't the brightest one ever elected that's for sure. Neither is Trump.

Was either qualified prior to being elected?

Obama had been a community organizer, a state senator, and a US senator. While the latter 2 obviously incorporate legislating they do not incorporate skills of an executive.

Trump spent the last several decades as head of his own company. I'm not sure where else you'd look in the private sector for someone with executive skills than head of an enormous well functioning company.

I mean, we all know the best Presidents that come from the public sector were governors. They were already doing the job albeit on a smaller scale. They can make decisions.

Senators or Congressmen? They have committees for that and that's fine. That's their job, to carry out the voice of the People. Some do it better than others. [?????]

So decision making...ask the parents of James Foley about Obama's decision making...dragging out his decision for nearly a month and then after getting the news he'd been beheaded spends 5 minutes in front of the cameras saying how disturbing this was and then laughs his way to the golf course. Obama suffered from paralysis by analysis. I guess he wasn't ready to "negotiate" with terrorists. Didn't stop him from dropping $150 Billion in cash to terrorist state Iran.... but hey...potAto - potahto.

Ask servicemen about Trump's decision making. He still manged to get the Coast Guard paid didin't he? He sent troops to the southern border knowing it would not be universally popular.

Both men are polarizing figures. Obama for being a detached pseudo-intellectual (smartest man in the room...hahahaaa) and Trump for essentially pirating the presidency from Hillary.

We are 2 years in on Trump. He had his tax cuts, runaway stock market, jobs, jobs, and a sh!tload more jobs.

Obama had Cash for Clunkers where he suggested everyone buy a foreign car.
Just a response to your "over the top" l... (show quote)




Let’s try to keep this discussion within the bounds of honesty and responsibility. I think things will go better if we do.

For example, I never said you couldn’t criticize Obama’s politics or his policies. As a matter of fact, I specifically said you could:

“You go too far. No rational person can accuse Obama of incompetence or corruption. None.

You may disagree with his policies or his politics; that is allowed. But the rest, never.”

What I said, if you read carefully, is that No One—Not Even You—can attack his competence or his honesty.

You try to tune the conversation to something entirely different, and that ain’t kosher.

I’m not going to argue IQ with you, as I have no specific information to specify. Obama is a smart man, and if you deny that you make yourself look foolish. Was he qualified before he was elected? Of course he was.

I’m not going to list his legal background, his community service or his government experience. He had better qualifications than most candidates, and I won’t even embarrass you listing Trump’s weaknesses other than to quote someone else who said Don’s father gave him $400 million to start out, and he soon ended up $900 million in the hole.

“Obama had been a community organizer, a state senator, and a US senator. While the latter 2 obviously incorporate legislating they do not incorporate skills of an executive.”

I can’t think of much better background in politics than ‘community organizer.’

What did Trump’s “executive” background give him. He’s a disaster as an executive. Executive time!!!

He has absolutely no understanding of negotiation, absolutely no executive ability, his selection of personnel (when said personnel would agree to work for him) is pitiful, and he knows absolutely nothing about law or government.


“I mean, we all know the best Presidents that come from the public sector were governors. They were already doing the job albeit on a smaller scale. They can make decisions.”

Well, not to put too fine a point on it, how about Abraham Lincoln? Harry Truman? George Washington? Thomas Jefferson?


You don’t know what went on about Foley. Silly example.

And you have a lot of nerve even mentioning “Golf Course” in this context.

The $150 billion was Iran’s money. Obama didn’t drop anything. Let’s keep the honesty thing going, OK?

He Got The Coast Guard Paid??? Really? Putin probably thought it was a good idea.

In the Mid-terms, the republicans were ashamed of the tax cuts, hardly mentioned them—turned to lying about how they were going to save Obamacare!!

OK. I’ll give you sending the troops to the border wasn’t universally popular, didn’t accomplish anything even though it was illegal.

That’s a pretty weak point.

Runaway stock markets??? Have you looked recently? You better reconsider your debate strategy.

You set yourself up with a pretty weak position, defending trump.

He’ll never finish the year....
Go to
Jan 7, 2019 11:42:27   #
Elaine2025 wrote:
Little tard, I took a cruise for 10 days and I see that in that time you have remained as uninformed and dishonest as ever.


Nobody missed you. Please take another.
Go to
Jan 7, 2019 11:28:18   #
Elaine2025 wrote:
I think you could use a strong cup of coffee and a sanity pill.


The perfect reply in this context, reflecting denial and self-ignorance, and destructive dishonesty.

Accept this a conformation of the above posts.....
Go to
Jan 7, 2019 00:46:32   #
LWW wrote:
All you need is evidence ... and we both know you don’t have any.


Look up Michael Lewis, The Big Short, and learn.
Go to
Jan 6, 2019 22:54:12   #
You have absolutely no idea of which you speak, but you do have a rich imagination.

Government wasn’t involved, just the profit motive.
Go to
Jan 6, 2019 22:52:07   #
You have no idea at all what you are speaking of, but you have a rich imagination.

Government wasn’t involved only the profit motive.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 1349 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.