Racmanaz wrote:
The Durham's investigations intent was to look into the origin of the Trump Russia investigation.
No. The Durham investigation's intent was to find impropriety in the origin of the Trump-Russia investigation, and in that, it failed miserably.
Racmanaz wrote:
Wrong again, it's a success because it succeeded in it's intent.
And what exactly was this "intent" that he supposedly succeeded in?
Racmanaz wrote:
Why are you Lefties so confused? Again and I'll repeat I said that Durham investigation succeeded and exceeded in it's intent. What does the Durham investigation intent have anything to do with what other people have said or would have Trump had said? You keep confusing the two or conflating the two I should say.
Yes, but just because you SAY it succeeded doesn't make it so.
Please, tell us exactly what crime he was able to find.
jpwa wrote:
All the politicians have insider info on stocks and investments. That's how they have all become multi millionaires.
When will normal people realize that politicians don't care about anybody but themselves. All they want from us "joe blows" is our money to spend as they see fit and our votes come election time.
Nearly all politicians (at the federal level) were multi-millionaires before they enter politics. It's the only way to afford to run a campaign.
Racmanaz wrote:
Durham- Succeeded
How can you possibly say Durham succeeded???
You might recall when his investigation started, the Trumpers promised he was going to "bring them all down": Hillary, Steele (maybe even Biden) behind bars... And Trump completely vindicated...
But what did we get ??? One person getting probation, and two laughably bad prosecutions leading to two acquittals. Durham's case was SO BAD that Danchenko did not need to present ANY witnesses on his behalf. This was clearly a desperate attempt on Durham's part to have something to show for his THREE years of wasting tax-payer money.
And the witnesses that Durham called actually called Danchenko a valuable asset to the US intelligence community -- or at least he was, until Durham outted him.
Conservatives aren't very good at humor.
anotherview wrote:
Biden suffers from an illogical mental operation. He sees the strong weather. Then he blames global warming for this condition. Yet he omits any linkage between cause and effect here; instead, he asumes it.
No, he doesn't "assume" it. He recognizes the scientific explanations that have been well-established, and do not need to be repeated YET AGAIN.
Racmanaz wrote:
Anytime there is a record high temperature or a record hurricane or tornado event, it's all climate change. But whenever there is a record freezing and snowfall it's just weather.
No, record freezing and snowfall are due to climate change also.
When it's winter here, it's summer in the southern hemisphere, where there is much more water. Record heat there means more evaporation, meaning more water in the air, meaning more snow where it is cold.
Fotoartist wrote:
Hear, hear, Bravo! 1200 climate scientists speak out against the majority of science cowards.
Since we have been told 97% of climate scientists agree on the current Global warming hypothesis that comes to
38,800 climate scientists worldwide. Hmm, I can't find where there are more than 10,000 climate scientists total worldwide. Curious.
Bzzztt... Sorry, No. 1200 *people* signed that statement, but virtually none are "climate scientists". Looking through the list, it seems most are Geologists or Mechanical Engineers. Nearly all are retired (i.e., watching more Fox News than keeping up-to-date in their fields).
Heres the actual list: https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/WCD-version-100122.pdf
Racmanaz wrote:
Biden did not have to fulfill that Doha agreement, Biden had the power and authority to cancel that agreement and go on with his own, which he kinda did anyway against the warnings of his generals. This is Biden's mess it's not Trump's mess he was not president at the time.
So, you're admitting that Trump made a bad deal, which Biden should have canceled, so it's Biden's fault because he actually followed the deal that Trump made...
As for canceling the Doha agreement, you still don't get it. The deal wasn't made with Trump, it was with the United States Of America. We were dumb enough to allow him to speak for the US, but we did, and we now have to live with the consequences. If Biden had canceled the deal, it would have told every country in the world, that a deal with the US is worthless, as it could be dropped as soon as the next president came in. Trump already told the world that with the Iran deal; Biden is now trying to repair the damage to our credibility that caused. The last thing he would want to do is confirm that belief.
So, to put it in a way you may be able to understand, you have "the power and authority" to drive down to Atlantic City and put your entire life savings on Double-0. It would nevertheless be an incredibly bad idea.
Racmanaz wrote:
You are once again deflecting and moving the goal posts when you see you lost the argument.
No, You are once again babbling nonsense, demonstrating you have no idea the actual issues involved, and are just parroting bloviating red-wing talking heads.
anotherview wrote:
This change would then allow for the election outcome to rest solely with the States of California and New York and perhaps with Texas.
No, it won't.
First of all, the PRESENT system allows the election outcome to rest solely with the states of Florida, Pennsylvania, and Ohio (and maybe Arizona). Why is letting them choose our president better than NY & CA?
Second, the Electoral system we have now is NOT at all like what the Founders designed (where each electoral voted independently). The all-or-nothing system we have now would have outraged them.
But, your entire theory shows your mind has been corrupted by the Electoral college. Once we eliminate the electoral college, we stop thinking about how STATES vote, and finally actually consider how PEOPLE vote. No state's people vote 100% for a single candidate (but your theory depends on that). Without the EC, a republican's vote in CA in exact worth EXACTLY the same amount as a republican's in FL and a democrat's in WY.
slocumeddie wrote:
Yep.....all white, five pointed stars.....(Odd you don't know that)
This is not an all white , five pointed star.....
I never said it was "all white".
And why is that relevant?
And why does it being blue make it demonic?
Architect1776 wrote:
More proof that the democrats are evil and devil worshippers.
It's a standard 5-point star --- exactly like the FIFTY on the US flag. (Odd you don't know that....)
Racmanaz wrote:
Lolol goodness, you just can't stand the fact that Trump increased their budget to an ADDITIONAL $100 billion that they were currently getting.
Whose "getting"?? NATO didn't get any more money. Member nations increased their own defense budget.