Posts for: LWW
Dec 9, 2020 15:12:25 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
After an election that displeased many of the elec... (show quote)
WOW!
1 We are in a civil war.
2 Lincoln was not anti slavery, he wanted to put blacks on ships bound for South America of Africa. If they ended up slave or fee didn’t matter to him and he said as much.
3 South Carolina seceded largely because they were told they couldn’t.
4 Lincoln broke a deal that he wouldn’t load Fort Sumter up with arms while negotiations continued. Breaking that deal led to more state’s seceding and the civil war.
My suggestion to you, read some books.
Dec 9, 2020 14:51:26 #
Frank T wrote:
Because they're a bunch of fat wannabees who couldn't climb up a flight of stairs without stopping to catch their breath.
Any one of which could whoop you like a rented mule.
Dec 9, 2020 14:43:38 #
Texcaster wrote:
Why is it these guys are always well armed and the coppers are always relaxed and comfortable them?
Because they don’t engage in criminal activities, and law enforcement ... I notice you could have used a respectful term for them, but chose not to ... are generally patriots.
That you also prefer that they would act more like the Stasi is also noted.
Dec 9, 2020 14:38:04 #
DukeTarHeel wrote:
I don't agree with your "backbone" statement but I do see the stretch for dictator-like powers. The increasing use of Executive Actions bypasses Congress. The stonewalling by McConnell, refusing to bring bills to a vote, disregards the will of the people. The use of "Acting" secretaries also bypasses Congressional oversight. trump wasn't the first, just the worst.
Yep, Barry was a bad dude.
Dec 9, 2020 11:37:39 #
And not a single leftist will admit tha Miss Nancy played them like Earl Scruggs played a banjo.
Dec 9, 2020 11:33:12 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
No, but it is sometimes difficult not to be insulting.
Socialism is insulting.
Dec 9, 2020 11:32:02 #
Dec 9, 2020 11:30:19 #
soba1 wrote:
You lefties are a bunch of heartless individuals. So long as I’m safe from COVID everyone else be damned
They agree with my question about peasants.
Dec 9, 2020 07:03:10 #
Carusoswi wrote:
I wonder why this story keeps being referenced here or anywhere else. The Texas official behind this court action is himself once convicted and still facing a criminal indictment. Additionally, one state has no standing to sue another state as to how that state carried out its implementation of an election. Watch this one go nowhere.
When will this clownish Trump era end?
Caruso
When will this clownish Trump era end?
Caruso
Read a book.
Dec 9, 2020 07:02:31 #
Bob Smith wrote:
So you want to make 2.5 million American votes stopped on technicalities. Goodbye to democracy. Remember there were Republican as well as Democrat voters who posted their votes in or do you just want to discriminate against Democrats.
I think their goal is to discriminate against illegal acts.
Dec 9, 2020 07:01:24 #
Dec 9, 2020 06:21:18 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
It is a made up contrived story to create a pre-determined point. Don’t take it too seriously.
Perhaps.
Perhaps you can explain why the logic behind it is faulty?
Dec 9, 2020 03:49:01 #
Kraken wrote:
Just a bunch of well-armed wannabes on the right just itching
to try out their overpowered guns on fellow Americans.
What a bunch of LOSERS
to try out their overpowered guns on fellow Americans.
What a bunch of LOSERS
Then why haven’t they done it?
Dec 8, 2020 17:15:31 #
[quote=Frank T][quote=yhtomit]That would be unconstitutional. 1st and 2nd....[/quot
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.[/quote]
Read a book.
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.[/quote]
Read a book.
Dec 8, 2020 17:14:26 #
Bill 45 wrote:
As for the Trump supporter, he or she calling for violence to overturn the vote of the people is finding out that violence is a two way street.
So you are OK with bombing those you disagree with.