Beth, I love your stories...not to mention your shots. Thank you.
Architect1776 wrote:
Why is the new format confusing so many people?
I find it very easy to understand.
In fact easier than the previous format.
100%+++.
So much better to select to view what you only want to see, instead of everything posted.
Jeffcs wrote:
I want to give a shout out to Cardnal Camera in Howell NJ
Any one whom is looking for honest store look them up they always treat me like they value my money
They ship to where ever
I live in SC and have no troubles
FYI....They have 3 locations: NJ- Langsdle, PA- Charlotte, NC
Rainman wrote:
OK, the Nikon grip is probably perfect, but I had a Vivitar grip on my last Nikon DLSR and it functioned flawlessly despite the fact that it was half the price. It had a shutter release and sub-selector and held an extra battery. It aligned perfectly with the camera body and was securely attached. Not that I care, but you would be hard pressed to tell it was not a Nikon grip. The main reason I wanted this was for the extra battery on board. The status was visible in the control panel and it was really nice to have the extra mAH when shooting video. Yes, it’s a little more ergonomic to shoot vertically with the grip, but that’s just an added bonus in my case. Before I spend anything on an aftermarket solution it would be nice to know if anyone else has any experience or recommendations. I thought that was the point of a forum.
OK, the Nikon grip is probably perfect, but I had ... (
show quote)
All good, but the Z8/Z9 cameras are 'chip' intensive and are you willing to assume the full responsibility for using these 3rd party batteries and grips? Nikon will not honor a warranty if problems caused by their use.
Rainman wrote:
Thanks for the advice, getting in a couple days of skiing so not checking in Dailey
So what do you do if the aftermarket battery or grip causes damage to your Z8?
Robert1 wrote:
Before you open your big mouth, read first what the OP was about. I don't even have a FF mirroless. I was looking at the Z lenses in anticipation of the eventuality that Nikon releases a chrome Zf; which I would be interested.
Now...
Think about what you want--
- lighter and smaller system package?
- new system?
- or just smaller lenses than your the DSLR FF lenses?
Don't answer.
The ZF is a superb camera in a relatively small profile.
The Z lenses, in general, are better than their DSLR comparisons; even at smaller apertures compared to the wider DSLR lenses.
All that really matters here is what lenses you want/need for your style of photography.
If size matters, then go with a different system.
Robert1 wrote:
That's besides the point. The post was not about performance or heftiness or Wheaties. Just about a realization I noted while looking at the Z lenses, specially the 50mm f 1.2 when I was under the impression that mirroless were supposed to be smaller or so I thought.
I haven't checked other brands for FF mirroless lenses, but I gather that they might be just as big as Nikon's Z.
I guess this is the crux of the matter. What you thought was not represented by Nikon. So to make this a generalization is wrong.
Z lenses are promoted as better performing lenses than their FF ED VR counterparts. And not only does scientific testing confirm this; but also anecdotal reviews. (Don't get in to some Z's don't have VR so you can't compare to the FF VR lens--it's about the SYSTEM).
Look at the 24-70 f/2.8 ED VR vs Z 24-70 f/2.8 S vs Z 24-70 f/4.0 S. The f/2.8s compare favorably for the Z. The Z performance is superior. I only added the f/4 because of the reviews comparing from f/4-f/8 to these other two lenses.
Exactly my opinion with this discussion.
Longshadow wrote:
Well, that seems to be the discussion subject.
What MPs are you referring to then?
My pictures are of 1 Mounted Policeman(see 'MP' on body) and many Mounted Policemen..
aka...MPs.
More of these MPs the better.
Longshadow wrote:
Obviously.
But not all are obsessed with it.
I'm not talking about the MPs in our cameras--I could care less-more or so.
IMO, the more MPs you have, the better!
See 1 MP (HorseJournals, 2/21/21, Melanie Huggett, Robin Duncan Photography)
See many MPs (same attribution)