Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dbfalconer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 53 next>>
Oct 7, 2023 20:00:07   #
User ID wrote:
Have no fear of looking through the eyepiece. You are not looking through the lens. Keep that in mind, cuz you should not trust any focus set in advance. If you have access to a sturdy old long tele from the preAF days thaz a lens that holds focus. Modern lenses use so many delicate moving parts that you cannot trust them to not shift a bit in transit or when being handled. Carefully focus that lens in magnified MF after framing your subject. On a tripod you could also use the horizon as a substitute for infinity focus distance. The extra 93,000,000 miles wont matter. No infinity can be larger or longer than any other infinity. IIRC infinity focus is anything beyond 1,000 FLs ... about 600 yards for that lens. For a solar eclipse, your foreground object is about 440,000,000 yards away.
Have no fear of looking through the eyepiece. You ... (show quote)


All this is in preparation for trying to shoot the annular solar eclipse next week. So I thought aiming at the sun I would just have to rely on LCD screen. And set focus on the moon tonight while there is one visible. Tape the ring in place.

Maybe I can focus on horizon and set settings just before the shoot, then put on the filter and aim for the sun/moon.

I really appreciate your advice…and everyone on UHH is so helpful! I’m also relying heavily on my pro friend who is going on this trip with me! No matter how the shoot or the weather turns out, it will be a great experience! First time at Mesa Verde! (I have another camera —Sony a7iii—to use for all my other photo opps on the trip.)
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 18:27:07   #
ricardo00 wrote:
Try the auto first, see what the f stop and shutter speed are, and then manually set those to the same settings after turning it to manual.


I got a shot in auto first, then manual.But when I put on the ND100000 and aim at the sun, all I get is black. No matter what aperture—8, 6.3. 16. SS 15-30. I am clearly in over my head! Missing something very basic. I am a rank novice with filters.
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 17:18:42   #
ricardo00 wrote:
When you say "nothing in Manual mode", do you mean you can't press the shutter or the picture is blank? If the later, you might check the settings, shutter speed, F stop, etc. And again I assume when you say manual, the auto focus is still on? If not, turn on auto focus first and put the camera in Manual mode which should still allow auto focus and see if you can take a picture first before switching to manual focus.

If using a tripod, you can turn the VC off. The MF (manual focus) should only be turned on after you can take a picture in Manual mode by setting the correct shutter speed and F stop.
When you say "nothing in Manual mode", d... (show quote)


Ok. Thanks. I’ll try those things. I was getting no picture—just black. Thanks again.
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 15:30:08   #
I put the Tamron 150-500mm tele on my Sony a6000 crop sensor. I can get photos in S, A, and Automatic modes...but nothing in Manual mode. What am I doing wrong? What settings do I need to change? This is to be my setup for shooting the Annular Solar Eclipse next week. I will need to set focus in advance. There are choices on the lens barrel---VC modes, VC on/off, and AF/MF. (I will use ND100000 filter then. And not look through viewfinder.) I searched 'net. Could not find any answers to this dilemma!

Thanks.

Diane
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 12:42:20   #
wdross wrote:
Welders glass has to stop UV rays. Otherwise welders would be blind. Welding generates strong UV with the high energy electric welding. I did welding for a while and learned about people who did not heed warnings about welding without using welders glass. The UV is a part of the very bright light produced by electric welding. And during the film days, the welding glass was what I used on my telephoto lens for a total eclipse. I viewed the stages up to totality through the telephoto lens with no damage to my eye. When I was younger and ignorant of the facts, I tried using multiple fully developed film and came within less than a second of losing my eye. After that very, very close call, I educated myself about things that could damage my eye and prevent me from doing photography. I promise you, I would not recommend welders glass unless it would be safe for use.

And, yes, Thousand Oaks Optical is a supplier for solar shades. I have used them before and found them to be very reputable.
Welders glass has to stop UV rays. Otherwise welde... (show quote)

I am looking for the welders glass too. Thanks.
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 11:05:23   #
alberio wrote:
👍👍👍


Thanks.
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 11:04:35   #
Canisdirus wrote:
Your ND is strong enough...you'll be fine.


Thanks again.
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 09:44:22   #
Machinedoc wrote:
Suggest you check out thousandoaksoptical.com for ISO certified filters. I purchased one from them in 2017 and it is outstanding. I'm not sure I would trust neutral density filters or welders glass.


Thanks. I will. Since I only learned of this issue a couple of days ago (thought I had bought correct filter), and I need it by Monday, I guess I will have to use what I have. I get mixed advice and read conflicting articles. Hoping for the best. My Eye protection is all set. Thanks again.
Go to
Oct 6, 2023 20:05:12   #
wdross wrote:
Two more thoughts. (1) If you can find solar shades on line, you might be able to get them in time (check the NASA site). (2) If not, consider going to a welders supply store and see if you can get an 18 ND or 19 ND welders glass. You can test them in the parking lot for what you like better. I have the 18 ND in a size that I could mount on my film camera's telephoto. Now I have used it several times since for just simple viewing since I have a photographic filter for my mirrorless camera. The welder's glass will stop UV rays from reaching your retina and burning it. The polymer shades will do the same (can be worn while the welder's glass has to be held). You can view for hours with no danger. I cannot say that about a photographic filter.
Two more thoughts. (1) If you can find solar shade... (show quote)


Thanks for all these suggestions. I will certainly be careful! I might be able to find the welders glass, too.
Go to
Oct 6, 2023 10:56:32   #
Canisdirus wrote:
You are at the minimum acceptable level of ND...you should be fine.
Depending on brand...expect a bit of color cast...if it is yellow...you might like it.
Bu the sun is white.

PP will fix that as well if you choose to.

Have fun.

Do NOT use an ND for optical viewing for yourself however...just your camera.


Thank you! Appreciate your speedy reassurance. You confirm what I thought. Grateful!
Go to
Oct 6, 2023 09:48:22   #
I am preparing to photograph the annular solar eclipse in Cortez, CO, next week. Plan to use Tamron 150-500 on Sony a6000. With a ICE ND100000 filter—16.5. Will this be adequate sensor protection? I will only use LCD screen, not look through eyepiece, so I do not understand if electronic viewfinder will be activated. ND use is not advised for optical viewfinders. The Sony is, of course, mirrorless. I just heard of ND1000000 (6 zeroes = 20), but could not obtain one now in time for the trip. Am hoping my brand new ICE ND100000 will do the job. The literature and sales sites have seemed contradictory and misleading. I am exhausted with researching this. Thanks.
Go to
Sep 23, 2023 07:56:38   #
gwilliams6 wrote:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sony_E-mount_lenses

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_third-party_Sony_E-mount_lenses

Both these lists are updated as new E-mount lenses are released.

Cheers


Thanks. Apprecjiate this info. Love my Sonys.
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 09:22:55   #
Verticalviking wrote:
With the forecast originally calling for heavy rain and possible closure of the trail, we chanced it anyway and were delighted with blue skies and warm weather. This is a favorite hike and going early is the best option.


Beautiful. This area was threatened by fire a couple of years ago. Nice to see it still looks great.
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 09:20:03   #
Dan Ellis wrote:
This continues my favorite state scenic photos. This time from my state of Missouri. Most of these have been shown before. As can be seen I like barns, water and red mills. I have way too many to choose from to limit it to just 10 but I may send another set later.


Lovely. What a great project!
Go to
Sep 17, 2023 09:53:56   #
dbrugger25 wrote:
It has always bothered me that the aspect ratios of film and standard print sizes aren't the same. It also bothers me that hot dogs come in packs of 6, 7 or 10 but buns come in 8 to a pack.

The obvious solution is to put ME in charge of all sizes and packaging and suddenly, everything would make sense.


While you are at it, oh Wise One, standardize and make sense of women’s clothing sizes! And food packaging in general—-grams? Liters? Poinds? Net weight? 🤪
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 53 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.