Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jerrypoller
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 20 next>>
Feb 12, 2016 07:55:49   #
Dngallagher wrote:
FWIW - I run El Capitan, I usually upgrade to the latest OS right away - have never run into a reason not to yet myself.

You might wish to take a look at several of the alternatives for Post processing work - Lightroom, Photoshop, Gimp, Dark Table, Rawtherapee, Capture One, Picasa, LightZone, View NX-2, View NX-I, Capture NX-D (View NX-2, NX-I & Capture NX-D are Nikon products) DPP (Canon)

There are a host of FREE and commercial products to replace the OS dependent freebies like Photos and IPhoto.
FWIW - I run El Capitan, I usually upgrade to the ... (show quote)


I've followed your posts/replies for quite a while now and respect your Mac computer knowledge. I was curious why you didn't mention Pixelmator in your list of alternative PP apps - I switched to it from iPhoto about 6 months ago and have found it very user friendly.
Go to
Jan 27, 2016 11:03:14   #
Gene51 wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Something else to consider which in the 7 pages in this post, no one has brought up. What settings are you using for AF-Area, Dynamic 1,11,21,51, how many Focus Points 11/51, Auto Area, 3D Tracking, and finally Focus Tracking with Lock On - short to long or off.

Back button focusing helps but is not critical to good focusing technique - I use both and get similar results.

For fast moving subjects, I either use Dynamic Area 21 or Auto Area. I have found that with the D800 3D Tracking is too slow for birds, but ok for athletes.

I keep Focus Tracking with Lock on between Normal and Short.

I use all 51 Focus Points - not just 11.

I will alternate between Focus and Release and just Release on AF-C Priority. More keepers with Focus and Release, but more missed shots as well. Birds against a clear sky or distant background work best for focus and release. Otherwise I will just use release.

AF-D vs AF-S - I have several AF-D lenses. I will often use an 80-200 F2.8 AF-D with a 1.4x TC to shoot sports - collegiate soccer, rugby and LaCrosse, - the D800's internal focusing drive is pretty fast and I feel that if I missed shots or did not acquire focus correctly it is usually my fault for not adequately anticipating where the action will be.

Looking at the work of many amateurs and professionals who come to me trying to do bird photography - the biggest issues are poor panning technique and settings other than what I have described. The will have 1 or 2 shots in focus in a sequence, with the other 15 or so out of focus. The other issue is relying on stabilization and using too low a shutter speed, too long on the Tracking so once they lose focus it takes too long to reacquire, too few focus points, and using a single point or Dynamic Area 51 point on AF mode.

With a little tweaking of these settings you can get better results.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: br br Something ... (show quote)


I have been using BBF since I got my D610 - a couple of years now. I also leave it in AF-C (necessary for BBF to work), but to capture the exact spot I want in focus, I've been using a Single focus point - maybe that wasn't the right answer to my focus needs - I've switched to the 39 focus point group and will see if that serves me better. I gather that adjusting the number of focus points in the group to suite the situation is the norm, but I don't think I'm ready for that yet - too many moving parts right now. We'll see - being able to make more adjustments on the fly as I gain experience is my expectation.
Go to
Jan 27, 2016 09:54:11   #
martinfisherphoto wrote:
If you Want the photo in Focus you turn the auto focus lock feature to OFF. In the Off position the camera will continue to focus as the subject moves... In the lock position is will stay in the same focus as the subject moves for the 1 or 3 or 5 second focus lock you have chosen. Focus lock Only works as the subject moves parallel to you, same distance away.. If the subject moves forward or backward your focus will be off until the camera refocuses at the 1, 3, 5 second intervals. Hope this helps.. PS I use the nikon D600 as well, absolutely no problem capturing BIF coming towards me or any other subject for that matter.
If you Want the photo in Focus you turn the auto f... (show quote)

Thanks - I'll give it a try - I was set at the default focus lock 3 without knowing what was going on. The theory, I just learned, is to stay focused on a moving subject if something breaks the focus plane. I'm curious to see how turning if off will affect my shooting.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 20:19:48   #
mcveed wrote:
A final note. You really should reconsider your shutter speed for shooting moving targets. A blurry picture is not necessarily out of focus.


Yes, one of the other replies also suggested that my shutter speed was probably too slow - I think I always underestimate the need for a faster shutter - I usually try and keep it at the focal distance or better, but when I'm doing quick zooming I don't pay enough attention to the shutter speed/focal distance relationship in my rush to get the shot - user error, not the tool. I'm going to increase the shutter speed and then consciously slow it when necessary, instead of the other way around and see how that works.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 19:58:21   #
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
Another tool for sorting out lens choices:
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/positioningmap/

You can customize view according to format, prime/zoom, AF-S, etc.


Thanks - I have my work cut out for tomorrow now.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 19:56:09   #
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
:thumbup:

But first, determine your ISO tolerance. Maybe you'll find your 610 can do the job after all.


The odds are even or better that you're right. I'll window shop a lot of solutions before I open my wallet again to satisfy my need for speed.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 19:54:18   #
DaveO wrote:
Wow! You sound hell bent on spending his money on either a body or new lenses..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: What's even funnier is that he apparently wants to but just wants a little push! We're here to help!!


Well, not quite. I don't WANT to spend more money, but would consider it if the return were substantial enough - which I'm gathering from many of the responses will not happen. More thinking and less spending is likely to occur before any GAS occurs.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 16:04:34   #
mcveed wrote:
No! Its the inherent slowness of the screw drive, no matter what body you use. There seems to be a general consensus that high end bodies that use more powerful batteries will have stronger focusing motors, but I can't find any test evidence of this. So, if you don't want to purchase AF-S lenses then I can only suggest a high end (D4, D3, D5) body. But how much faster they will focus your lenses is a guess. It might be worth renting a D3 or 4 and doing a test.


Now that I've read 5 pages of responses to my post (by the way, I don't post often, but I'm humbled when I do that they get such a volume of interest/suggestions) I'm rethinking a faster AF platform and wondering if AF-S lenses on my D610 aren't a better direction. Which "fast" replacements would you suggest, should I find a pot of gold one day?
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 15:37:59   #
DaveO wrote:
Keep in mind that 1/over focal length is often valuable,particularly for clarity as your length increases. We all probably get away with less on occasion,but.....you'll get it.


I know that rule of thumb, and still violate it regularly in my determination to keep the ISO low - maybe a throwback to my youth when ASA 400 film was "fast" (and grainy). I'm just going to have to bite the bullet and push the ISO up to get the faster shutter speeds these fast lenses will permit.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 15:25:05   #
DaveO wrote:
I hear you! I thought I was fairly proficient with the various aspects and combos of the focus system,but I've learned much since then! Don't be afraid to run the ISO up a little in your experimenting. You need quicker shutter speed with the kids. I don't care how fast the camera can focus if the shutter speed isn't appropriate. I'm betting that you'll win this battle!


Yeah, I've been reluctant to run the ISO up too high, so I generally set my f/stop to between 2.8 and 4 to let in lots of light, but restrict the shutter speed to 1/125th or slower to keep ISO under 2500 or so. Last night I shot a school concert with my 80-200mm at full zoom and used 1/90 or 1/125 - probably should have doubled that shutter speed. Well, the good news is there are plenty of school concerts to go to for practice - next Sunday as a matter of fact. Wish me luck.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 15:25:05   #
DaveO wrote:
I hear you! I thought I was fairly proficient with the various aspects and combos of the focus system,but I've learned much since then! Don't be afraid to run the ISO up a little in your experimenting. You need quicker shutter speed with the kids. I don't care how fast the camera can focus if the shutter speed isn't appropriate. I'm betting that you'll win this battle!


Yeah, I've been reluctant to run the ISO up too high, so I generally set my f/stop to between 2.8 and 4 to let in lots of light, but restrict the shutter speed to 1/125th or slower to keep ISO under 2500 or so. Last night I shot a school concert with my 80-200mm at full zoom and used 1/90 or 1/125 - probably should have doubled that shutter speed. Well, the good news is there are plenty of school concerts to go to for practice - next Sunday as a matter of fact. Wish me luck.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 15:18:17   #
DaveO wrote:
I usually start at 1/250 with the kids. Use shutter priority and work the aperture/ISO later if you need to.


I'll certainly give it a try - thanks.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 15:17:15   #
DaveO wrote:
I've seen a similar focus problem and found that I had the AFC Priority set to Release mode instead of Focus mode. Just a thought,lots of variables.


Another good point DaveO. I just checked and was pleased to see I, too, have it set to Focus.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 15:14:45   #
DaveO wrote:
I am still reluctant to blame the original issue on the quality of the equipment....no offense intended.


None taken DaveO. I am a strong proponent of "it's a poor workman who blames his tools". But, if there are better tools, I also believe in buying the best you can afford and I respect the opinions of the contributors to this forum. Food for future thought.
Go to
Jan 26, 2016 15:12:08   #
DaveO wrote:


In short,quite possibly faster shutter speed can be as important as faster focus when addressing the OP's issue.


Excellent point - I usually am shooting in the 90th-120th of a second to use the aperture I want and to achieve the ISO I'm comfortable with. I'll try a faster shutter speed and a little higher ISO next time and see how it comes out.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 20 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.