This election clearly showed that Trump needs to step back, but his ego won’t let him.
LDB415 wrote:
Both C and R are not, but both are good at fooling some of the people all of the time and all of the people much of the time.
Before the insurrection, Chaney voted with Trump 92% of the time. She could not accept the Big Lie, or his refusal to admit defeat. She IS a conservative who can see the good of the Republican party beyond the autocratic leanings of a disillusioned narcissist.
LDB415 wrote:
The first problem with this is Cheney and Romney aren't republicans. Bearing a certain label doesn't mean the contents are as reputed.
Both Chaney and Romney are proven conservatives, established by their voting records. Not all good conservatives are election deniers who think Trump walks on water.
Trump is not well.
LDB415 wrote:
I don't think they are all evil. I know they aren't. It's just that the ones who are give the other 2% a bad name. Same with the 15% of good republicans and 31% of good independents.
Your semi-retraction adds much to your credibility.
I am a liberal, and I don’t think Republicans are evil. I do think that some who contribute to this forum are either trolls, or are very misguided. Their blunt condemnations of all leftists, and their blind allegiance to a noted liar and conman, despite evidence, is simply weird.
LDB415 wrote:
Yes, they are. And they wear all hats. But primarily they wear democrat hats. Voting democrat means one WANTS bad things to happen to harm the country, to harm the citizens. Voting democrat means one WANTS evil, because democrats are evil.
Why do you think all democrats are so evil? Who told you that?
FrumCA wrote:
Nonsense! As far as I know people in America are allowed to disagree with the government.
Yes. In the United States, we are allowed, and should voice our disagreement with the government through the voting process. We elect leaders who will carry out the agenda that we most want.
But, when a sitting President, and former President disparage every democratic institution, the sitting lawmakers and President, the FBI, the IRS, the Justice department, the basic rule of law, encourages racism, violence, tribal mentality, and spreads undocumented lies, refuses to accept a legitimate election convincing his followers that every institution in the country is flawed, evil and without integrity—then something is terribly wrong.
We might have different ideas about the government, but destroying institutions through lies, unconstitutional insurrection attempts, and promoting division; is not a workable, democratic solution.
This young narrow minded woman doesn’t want to be criticized for articulating her beliefs, but begins her rant with a telling intolerance for those with sexual orientations that she doesn’t begin to understand, and refuses to accept.
Her God is her God, not the God of every American. She doesn’t get it.
Republicans who lose will follow Trump’s lead and declare themselves winners.
The deranged attacker, by his own stupid admission, wanted to break Nancy’s kneecaps. So, when wheeled into Congress in a wheelchair, she would serve as an example to other liberals.
How sick is that?
cwp3420 wrote:
So far on this post you haven’t. But you certainly have in the past.
Not true. Calling people names adds nothing to a discussion, aside from the name caller being exposed as childish with no other rational defense.
cwp3420 wrote:
It’s childish for you left wing liberals to always defend corrupt left winger politicians doing corruptible things, and yet if they’re Republicans, you go all ape shit and refute any facts in the case. It’s also hypocritical of you to say others shouldn’t call anyone names, when you do it all the time, 9 volt.
Who have I directly called a name? No one.
cwp3420 wrote:
The crazy man wasn’t after Nancy, 9 volt. He wanted to make sure Nancy wouldn’t catch them in their little sexual dalliance they had going on.
So, the crazy men decides to kill Nancy’s husband in their own home—to keep their relationship a secret. That makes a lot of sense. Nonsense and crap.
Why do you continue with the names? It is childish
JRiepe wrote:
What you believe happened may be true but for me I have doubts that what you believe is the whole story. I don't condone violence and do know right from wrong but if I believed everything I read and everything I was told and didn't question anything I'd be a shallow gullible individual that could be led anywhere. Is it wrong that I question the lying corrupt media?
Fine. I don’t know the whole story either. But, think for just a brief moment.
If Paul was a homosexual and picked a homosexual partner, to share in his passion, with or without Nancy’s consent, would he attach himself to a degenerate, Nancy hating, conspiracy driven, nut job, way out of his social class; or would he engage with a solid, upper class elite, who knows digression, and would fit in with his lifestyle.
This is ridiculous, and again, is indicative of Republican hate—without reason or thought.
He was attacked by an idiot, in his home—not a degenerate lover. Blind bias confirmation is ugly.
FrumCA wrote:
Well now. Isn't this swell. You get on Jreipe because he suggests that things aren't adding up and you're calling him an a**. They real a**es are those who can't understand that there are 2 sides of the story. In this case would be the left.
No one called anybody an ass. I said the right wing participants are “showing their asses” by making things up and being totally insensitive to a terrible attack on an innocent.
Again, you twist and play with words—skirting truth to fit your agenda,
JRiepe wrote:
The point is the story is not adding up. You are willing to believe whatever you hear no matter how ludicrous it sounds? You are believing what you want to believe. If Pelosi was a Republican you'd be questioning the story.
Not true. An 82 year old man attacked by an unknown assailant in his own home by a conspiracy-believing lunatic, whose intent was to beat Nancy to death with a hammer, and the right wing crowd simply cannot accept the evil, violent simplicity of it, and instead seeks to tear his story apart. The Right wingers on this site are truly showing their asses. If an 82 year old Republican, or any Republican, or any other man, woman, or child, was attacked in such a manner, I would be disgusted, and in no way try to rationalize the attack, or story, or make up asinine stories to fault the recipient.
Have you all lost perspective with regard to decency, empathy, or right from wrong?