Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Twardlow
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1349 next>>
Jan 11, 2019 10:36:30   #
Cykdelic wrote:
You might want to research a little further on the Great Wall. It actually worked quite often, and it’s largest failure was when invaders came through the gate!



“...and it’s largest failure was when invaders came through the gate!”

Thank you for helping make my point. Unusual for you to be rational, but I accept this instance.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 10:29:39   #
Cykdelic wrote:
Get off of your fat ass and come down to the border for a night or two (as you seem to refuse to listen to the agents on the border).... what you will see is quite the experience. Try Santa Theresa or Antelope Wells, or even El Paso.

Note.....the walls DO work in the areas they were built. Talk to any border agent while you’re down there (not some retired or fired idiot in D.C.) in EVERY area where there was a new barrier built the illegal crossings there went down and yes, they were funneled to other areas. This funneling narrows the vast expanse to search and arrest.
Get off of your fat ass and come down to the borde... (show quote)




On the Border, Little Enthusiasm for a Wall: ‘We Have Other Problems That Need Fixing’

By SIMON ROMERO, MANNY FERNANDEZ, JOSE A. DEL REAL and AZAM AHMED JAN. 8, 2019


COLUMBUS, N.M. — Just minutes from the border in rural New Mexico, the Borderland Cafe in the village of Columbus serves burritos and pizza to local residents, Border Patrol agents and visitors from other parts of the country seeking a glimpse of life on the frontier. The motto painted on the wall proclaims “Life is good in the Borderland.”

“This is the sleepiest little town you could think of,” said Adriana Zizumbo, 31, who was raised in Columbus and owns the cafe with her husband. “The only crisis we’re facing here is a shortage of labor. Fewer people cross the border to work than before, and Americans don’t want to get their hands dirty doing hard work.”
President Trump has shut down part of the government over border security and his plan to build a wall along the border with Mexico, and in a prime-time speech on Tuesday night he painted a bleak picture of life in towns like Columbus.

He said border residents were suffering through a “humanitarian crisis,” and he described a landscape scarred by violence and prowled by “vicious coyotes and ruthless gangs.” But that is not how Ms. Zizumbo sees it. People in Columbus, she said, opposed the idea of a wall by about a “90-to-10 margin.”
“Enough about the wall already,” she said. “We have other problems here that need fixing.”

Extending nearly 2,000 miles from southern Texas to a fence jutting out into the Pacific Ocean in San Diego, America’s border with Mexico is as long and as varied as the terrain. Remote spots in the desert like Columbus, a town of 1,600 people about 80 miles west of El Paso, are sleepily tranquil. In cities like El Paso and San Diego, the growing number of migrant families pushing for entry to the United States has generated crowds and controversy, with migrants packed into detention centers and bus stations, and clashes at the fences between rock-throwing immigrants and federal agents.

In anticipation of the president’s speech, The New York Times sent correspondents to the Mexico side of the border and to the four states on the United States side — California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas — and found few who shared the president’s sense of alarm.

Many said there was indeed a humanitarian crisis unfolding, but they blamed the Trump administration for worsening it with a series of policies aimed at deterring Central American migrants from making the journey. Those policies, many of which have been blocked by legal challenges, have failed to stop the flood of migrants. But they have succeeded in escalating tensions, overwhelming volunteer shelters and putting those seeking asylum from violence at renewed risk of health threats and other problems once they arrive in the United States.

The border has long been more than a barrier or a headline. It is the setting of a uniquely American story, a binational place of contradictions and commerce. One afternoon a few months ago, a Latino teenager walked through the bus station in the South Texas city of McAllen, a transit hub where hundreds of apprehended immigrants are dropped off daily by the authorities. The boy was not fresh from detention. He was a native Texan. He was visiting a relative and wore a black T-shirt correcting any misconceptions about his identity. It read “Relax Trump, I’m legal.”

That was the vibe along many parts of the border on Tuesday, ahead of Mr. Trump’s speech.

A cattle rancher in southern Arizona said he had traveled to Mexico a day earlier, and he saw no emergency. The lines were long — officials have shut down the number of ways people there can cross — but there were no signs of conflict or people pressing to get in.

“There is no border problem, except for ones we are causing,” said the rancher, who said he had not had any problems with illegal border crossers on his property and who asked not to be identified out of fear of retribution from strident supporters of Mr. Trump’s planned border wall. “There’s no need for a bigger wall. There is not a border crisis down here.”

Some of the worsening problems, some city officials have said, are a result of the federal government’s own management of the border. In El Paso and other cities in California and Arizona, the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency has in recent weeks released thousands of immigrants unannounced onto city streets, forcing city officials and migrant shelter operators to scramble to accommodate them.

“They were just being dropped off with nothing — no money, nothing,” said Kevin Malone, one of the founders of the San Diego Rapid Response Network, which has been dealing more frequently with unannounced releases. “They’re setting people up for failure every step along the way. This is a contrived emergency. They don’t have to be doing it like this.”

From 2014 to 2017, local municipalities in South Texas had to spend $873,000 on immigrant relief efforts, expanding staffing, securing migrant assistance centers and maintaining restrooms, generators and sleeping quarters.

“Then we get blasted for being sanctuary cities — get real,” said Jim Darling, the mayor of McAllen. “It’s not our fault. The feds are the ones dropping them off. What are we supposed to do?”

Some of those along the border, to be sure, believe the government should be not rushing to accommodate new migrants but fortifying to keep them out. James Johnson, a prominent farmer in Columbus, said he had voted for Mr. Trump in 2016 and continues to support the president, including his proposal for a wall.

“Listen, we need security and a wall will provide that security,” said Mr. Johnson, 43, whose family-owned onion and chile farm sits along a stretch of the border. “I’m 100 percent for the wall. Trump is bold in pushing for it.”

For a look at those whom Mr. Trump’s supporters would like to keep out, one needed only to take a short drive across the border from southern Texas to the Mexican town of Matamoros, where hundreds of migrants were biding their time on Tuesday, waiting to cross into the United States and apply for asylum.
A porous tarp at their makeshift camp shielded them from the sun and, for the most part, the rain.
A Honduran mother, Iris Patricia Oseguera, 51, sat in slightly better conditions, at a nearby shelter, with her 10-year-old son. Having been turned back from the international bridge crossing by Mexican authorities when she tried to enter the United States, she said the two of them had been told to find permanent housing soon.

“We have nowhere to go,” Ms. Oseguera said, adding that she and her son could not return to Honduras because of the worsening gang violence there. If forced to leave the shelter, she said, she wasn’t sure where she would go. “We don’t even have money to eat. How am I going to pay for a house?”
At the migrant camp, a group of American volunteers was giving away bags of fruit and bottles of water.
One of them was Cyndie Rathburn, the mayor of the Texas town of Rancho Viejo, home to what she described as a large population of conservative Trump supporters. “This is not a national security crisis,” she said as she purchased a bag of fruit from a local vendor. “President Trump has a flair for hyperbole and rhetoric.”

Back at the Borderland Cafe in New Mexico, Ms. Zizumbo’s husband, Lawrence Haddad, keeps a pistol underneath the cash register in case something happens. He hasn’t had to use it.

“Nothing much happens, and that’s the way people like it,” said Mr. Haddad, 32.

Still, quiet Columbus hasn’t escaped the political turmoil over border policy: Ahead of the midterm elections in November, self-described militia members from around the country descended on the town to prepare for the arrival of a caravan of Central American migrants, then making its way up through Mexico.

“Honestly, these guys were kind of absurd, wearing camo and looking at their maps,” Ms. Zizumbo said. “They accomplished nothing, and now they’re gone. Maybe they’ll be back after Trump talks.”
Hours ahead of Mr. Trump’s address on Tuesday, Randy Shaw, 71, was outside the Borderland Cafe. He held a sign that read “Stop truth decay: Dump Trump.”

Mr. Shaw is from Wyoming, but spends winters in Columbus. “This whole crisis thing is Trump’s creation,” he said. “Don’t let him fool you.”

Simon Romero reported from Columbus, N.M.; Manny Fernandez from Houston; Jose A. Del Real from San Diego; and Azam Ahmed from Matamoros, Mexico. Ford Burkhart contributed reporting from Nogales, Ariz., and Mitchell Ferman from McAllen, Tex

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/08/us/border-wall-crisis-mexico-usa.html
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 10:22:45   #
Huey Driver wrote:
As usual lots of verbal flatulence from you dirtbutt but as usual nothing specific and constructive like what's better than a wall?


You didn’t address me, but I’ll answer.

What is better than the wall is addressing the basis of the issue, which is uncontrolled terror in migrant’s home countries.

As long as citizens live in terror in Central America, they will move heaven and earth to go someplace better, and that is usually the USA.

If we’re going to fix the problem, fighting terror is Central America is the solution.

Everything else is mindless busywork, actually busy-won’t-work, leading to dollars wasted, lives lost, perpetual terror, and the possibility that terror will emigrate to the US.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 10:16:54   #
wilpharm wrote:
pot calling the kettle black...tell us more about your "sophisticated" career....Kennedy Center much??


Childish,

And

Boring.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 10:12:32   #
Huey Driver wrote:
It truly boggles my mind the number of people who are against the wall but have no other solution to the illegal border crossings. Are these people just plain ignorant and think illegals crossing the border isn't a problem that needs to be dealt with now?


Do you understand that crossings are at a 45 year low?

Do you understand that most ‘illegals’ FLY into this country?

Do you understand the Great Walls often—usually—Fail?

And that they fail in more ways than one.

The Israeli wall, touted as a great success, has guaranteed perpetual war since the day it was built.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 10:04:42   #
wilpharm wrote:
wow..twatsie..get up on the wrong side of your cave this am? getting easier to get under your skin, it seems...sad thing is..you have NO strong suit..poor laughable old man....looks more & more like you have Ginsberg syndrome..wanna brag some more about your musical genius...sure as hell google cant find it!!!!


More of the same, insecurity and BS!

This is as sophisticated as you get?

Childish,

And

Boring.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 09:28:24   #
Pegasus wrote:
Tadslow, here's the thing; if you didn't write it, I don't read it.

At any rate, walls have been working very well for thousands of years. What you border denialists do not understand is that the wall we are talking about here is not designed to be 100% effective. We don't want to spend the money for that and I can assure you that the last few percents in effectiveness increase the price dramatically. There is a level between wide open space and a super-effective impenetrable fortress. A simple wall or fence will deter 90%+ and that's what we're looking for.

I suspect you do not lock your car, or your front door; why would you? It's not 100% effective.

Walls work, a great example is the Maginot Line.
Tadslow, here's the thing; if you didn't write it,... (show quote)


Looks to me that you’ve been reading me, but you haven’t been thinking—the Maginot Line was one of History’s GREAT FAILURES—a very poor example for you to assert, a very good one for me to point out.

I hope trump’s wall is a greater success than your history or your insight.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 09:24:11   #
wilpharm wrote:
what is a "speach" pattern, genius???


Just had to get in there, didn’t you?? Can’t stand the thought that no one is paying attention to you.

Do you every have a contribution to make, or do you offer BS as your strong suit?

You show a great capacity for embarrassment, or ignorance of it.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 09:19:13   #
LWW wrote:
Nobody has suggested the entire 2,000 miles ... and supply your case that walls don't work.

San Diego claims it works as well as many other border areas.

The border patrol says it works.

Schumer says it works ... so does Obama ... so does Biden ... so does Hillary.

If you have a case, make it ... just, please, stop being a sock puppet for Rachel.


Of course the suggestion was the full 2,000 miles—are you lying as you accuse others of or merely critically misinformed?

And I have supplied you desired case that The Great Wall Of China failed, the Israeli wall kept war alive and active each and every day since it was built, The Berlin Wall was Russia’s shame and a beacon to the free world, The Great Wall of Athens failed the worlds most civilized nation, Hadrian’s didn’t save Rome from the barbarians, and on and on.

This boondoggle to the base will enrich a world of trump’s cronies—including, no doubt, trump himself, The Corruption King!—and cause only minor inconvenience to the ‘illegals,’ as they tunnel under it (or use tunnel already in place) sail around it Vacation style, or Fly Over it in Comfort and Splendor.

Ah, Failure, Additional Failure, then Repeated Failure, chasing Phantoms and Shadows in Run-From-Terror-and-Save-Your-Family-in-America game of Hide and Seek.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 08:54:40   #
wooden_ships wrote:
Walls are useful in small areas where constant vigilance can be assured. Only simpletons think a wall is a 2,000 mile wall is a viable solution.

Trump listened to a presentation by the military that estimated 315 miles of wall would cost $13.9 BILLION. For the mathmatically challenged, that’s over $44 million PER MILE!!! Yeah, what a deal - I’m sure that’s cost justifiable.

Wake up, the wall is a rallying cry for the stupid and a grand boondoggle for the grifters friendly to trump.
Walls are useful in small areas where constant vig... (show quote)


The Wall, vulnerable to a common hand saw, is not a barrier at all, but a ruse to ignite the passion of ‘the base,’ to keep then aroused and vigilant in the face of inevitable impeachment, to keep rabble in the streets, adrenalin in full flow, and the illlusion of legitimacy alive and in full affront to reason and the nation.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 08:47:04   #
LWW wrote:
Stop lying.


Ah, the empty charge, the desperate search to avoid reality, the dishonest man’s motto and the failure’s excuse...the empty charge of lying to cover the instance of failure.

The Wall: the thing that never keeps intruders out, the thing gone under, gone over, or gone around—the thing oblivious to the fact that most ‘illegals’ FLY into this country, and illegal drugs cross the border At The Checkpoints—and we stop only 10% of them.

But we call all of these ‘lies’ on our way to purchase our new Ford Edsel.

The Statue of Liberty blushes, and donald trump is a dishonest, lying sumbitch.
Go to
Jan 11, 2019 07:16:23   #
Pegasus wrote:
Of course walls work, and they work very well which is why the Dims are against the wall. In more ways than one.

Walls are very good at preventing people from going where you do not want them to go. They have been in use for thousands of years very successfully.


Can you read?

Walls have failed for a thousand years.

And if they work temporarily, they create other issues, as in Israel and Berlin.

The Great Wall of China—so big it can be seen from outer space—failed.

How about Jericho?

How about Hadrian’s Wall?

Their failures are legion and legend.
Go to
Jan 10, 2019 20:31:20   #
LWW wrote:
This thread is a lie, liar.


Again you run away....
Go to
Jan 10, 2019 17:52:11   #
FrumCA wrote:
A not unexpected response from you. Facts hurt don't they!!


Let’s try it and find out: name a ‘fact’ that I got wrong, be specific. And lets see whether it hurts one of us, and see which one suffers.
Go to
Jan 10, 2019 17:50:30   #
LWW wrote:
You do realize that repeating the lie won’t make the lie into truth?


Why would you expect me to learn that, when you haven’t learned it.

If you see a lie, call me on it.

Be specific.

Don’t compound the situation with 400 year old definitions of “liberal.”
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1349 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.