Posts for: pete-m
Jan 19, 2016 22:13:20 #
Uuglypher wrote:
Hi, Pete,
Personal opinion?
Both could qualify as "street" but neither would elicit more than a cursory glance of cause a breac-in -step in my circulation through the gallery. the first is architectural, and though there are people in the second, they are off to the side, seem not to be niter acting, and all seem to be wasting to go elsewhere.Not he kind of potential story to hold attention.
One guy"s opinion.
Dave
Personal opinion?
Both could qualify as "street" but neither would elicit more than a cursory glance of cause a breac-in -step in my circulation through the gallery. the first is architectural, and though there are people in the second, they are off to the side, seem not to be niter acting, and all seem to be wasting to go elsewhere.Not he kind of potential story to hold attention.
One guy"s opinion.
Dave
Yep,
They are kind of touristy, if that's a word.
Here's one of a tourist.
Jan 18, 2016 13:56:12 #
I think street photography should include an indication of some type of activity usually including people. Here is a "technically" nice photo of a street without people present and another with people and vegetables.
Jan 18, 2016 13:25:50 #
Jan 18, 2016 12:39:44 #
Darkroom317 wrote:
Medium format is not only square. 6.45 x 6, 6x6, 6x7, 6x8, 6x9, 6x12 and 6x17 are all sizes that can be shot on 120 film. 6x7 is my main format. It enlarges to 8x10 without cropping.
Me too
Jan 10, 2016 12:53:00 #
My opinion is # 1
Although I don't know that changing the exposure by pp is actually changing the exposure.
Although I don't know that changing the exposure by pp is actually changing the exposure.
Jan 8, 2016 12:43:23 #
Garyminor wrote:
Before photography went digital, there were just a... (show quote)
I still have mats and frames using those standards. I generally used the next larger size for the mat. Example 11x14 mat for 8x10 print.
Having said that, please read dpullum's posts. One should not believe these standards are absolute.
Today, if I were going to print something for display I would use a matte finish without covering it with glass. (In my opinion reflections ruin the display). Using an oversize mat is optional.
For the record I am a year older than dpullum (1935).
Everybody wore hats back then but times have changed.
Jan 7, 2016 13:24:43 #
Sandito wrote:
Is it wrong to be completely frustrated with a "photographer" who has no idea what equipment she has nor what said equipment is even capable of? How on earth can you take decent photos if you have no idea what F stop or focal length any of your lenses are and can't even recal the exact type of camera you have? 😁
Ok I'm done.
Ok I'm done.
What's really frustrating is when that persons photographs are better than yours.
Dec 20, 2015 18:46:27 #
Dec 20, 2015 18:31:19 #
Dec 17, 2015 14:24:35 #
Dec 14, 2015 11:13:17 #
Dec 11, 2015 11:21:44 #
Good luck!
Oct 26, 2015 12:34:12 #
Nice dance sequence, But more importantly where was the dog going. Very mysterious.
Oct 11, 2015 16:10:22 #
Hi rpavich
RE: Push processing.
Something I could never bring myself to do. Had to always use reasonably fresh materials.
Even with the zone system I just exposed for the highlights so I didn't have to mess with development by exposing for the shadows.
I am impressed.
RE: Push processing.
Something I could never bring myself to do. Had to always use reasonably fresh materials.
Even with the zone system I just exposed for the highlights so I didn't have to mess with development by exposing for the shadows.
I am impressed.
Oct 11, 2015 15:58:26 #