Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tinplater
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 105 next>>
Dec 14, 2018 19:12:21   #
He has kidnapped Clever Greene (Rake) and is leaving Australia
Go to
Dec 14, 2018 09:58:48   #
Very dramatic...but what is going on in the blue sky background? Is that a processing artifact?
Go to
Dec 12, 2018 12:43:57   #
Thanks to all...I had previously searched and the old responses years back were excellent, nice to hear they have continued their excellent record. I can buy with confidence.
Go to
Dec 12, 2018 11:25:55   #
Any experience with this seller? Offer 30 day free returns, free shipping, and throw in a bundle of cheap accessories selling same price as B&H for the Sigma 135mm FE lens?
Go to
Dec 8, 2018 21:15:21   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Did you CTRL-A (Select All) on the filtered results and then right-click with your mouse on any image and come down to the 'set' menu options and then select 'none' from the Color labels?


Thanks!!
Go to
Dec 8, 2018 17:00:26   #
DWU2 wrote:
Filter your files to find all the photos with color labels. In the grid view, press CTRL-A to select all. Then, right-click on one of the photos, and select Set Color Label, and choose None.


Thanks! Worked perfectly. Much appreciated.
Go to
Dec 8, 2018 12:55:58   #
Over time I have applied a rather haphazard different attributes to some of my images. For example I may use the color yellow to identify images I want to export. I wonder if there is a way to bring up all of these rated images and REMOVE the attribute to ALL of the rated images? At the moment I can only figure out a way to remove the tag from each photo individually. I enter G mode, select attribute from the top menu, choose yellow, and all the images with a yellow selection appear. But even if I select all rated images, and then click on yellow square, only the rating is removed from the first of the included images.
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 11:47:44   #
BB4A wrote:
To misquote a phrase (but I hope the Hoggers get my perspective);

“There is no such thing as bad lighting, there is merely inappropriate equipment or artistic interpretation.”

On a serious note, there really are lenses and digital camera bodies out there that can faithfully record the photons reflected off black cats, in cellars, at night, during a lunar eclipse. That equipment also supports our creative interpretation of an image concept, allowing us to initiate, plan, and execute an artistic image.

It may be our choice, or our financial constraints that play into our decisions not to attempt photography in lower available light conditions. And that of course is OK. I personally was impressed by these images, and many others taken in those lower available light scenarios and presented in this Forum... Good Job.
To misquote a phrase (but I hope the Hoggers get m... (show quote)


Thank you...I am amazed at how modern equipment can literally see in the dark!
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 11:09:04   #
Really my first attempt at photographing an event. We were invited to a Christmas concert of the Rhythm Cats in Mesa, AZ and thought I would give a try at photographing our host's brother, an accomplished musician (keyboard, horns, guitar, vocals, and tap dance!). Taken with my Sony A7III and 85mm 1.8. Fun time, wish I had more reach (photos cropped) but I wanted large aperture and reasonable shutter speed to keep ISO reasonable. (70-200 f4 my other option).


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 10:58:58   #
Fotoartist wrote:
If it's a true nature competition then the hand of man should not intrude.


Don't agree...the rules of the competition are what should or should not intrude. Otherwise, when you take that sunset, you purposely underexpose, then manipulate exposure, clarity, white balance, and so forth, the "hand of man" is indeed present. Any post processing is an intrusion (and of course intrusion is not necessarily bad). Once again, IMO, it is how the image strikes you that is important, not how it was made.
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 18:38:22   #
BB4A wrote:
Sorry, but this is my Only Rant for 2018... I just have to get it out there or burst.

I was recently invited to help judge a Close-up &/or Macro Flower Photography Competition. I was delighted to be asked... until I started looking through the photographs themselves. Nearly 50% of the images were of flowers arbitrarily sprayed with water droplets. So, I started disqualifying every photograph that I believed was “artificially enhanced” by photographers with a camera in one hand, and a spray bottle in the other.
Sorry, but this is my Only Rant for 2018... I just... (show quote)


You know I don't care if blue light has been shined on the item, dirt or leaves scattered on it, inverted, polarized, burned, dodged, color altered, sharpened, whatever. It is how the image strikes me, is it creative, does it evoke a feeling, and so forth. The last thing I would worry about is whether or not a spray bottle was used to enhance the image. The cactus garden shot is not "fake" but rather real raindrops on our cactus garden in Arizona.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 30, 2018 19:50:09   #
Welcome from Cache Valley
Go to
Nov 27, 2018 08:41:15   #
ggenova64 wrote:
You send the money to a seller's PayPal account via email. PayPal sends a confirmation and the seller ships the merchandise.


I understand other comments about element of trust among members here, but I am wondering if there is, in fact, a process to protect the buyer from sending someone money via paypal for a purchase and the seller just pockets the money and runs? This happened to me years ago on Ebay, that is now corrected by their buyer protection policy.
Go to
Nov 26, 2018 23:58:06   #
kodiac1062 wrote:
A valid question of which I don’t know the answer. Obviously there is a record of the payment, I would say seller would have to have proof (receipt) that he sent it out. I guess the question is would PayPal get involved if product isn’t delivered to the buyer


I think (but don't know with certainty) that there might be a process where Paypal doesn't release the funds to the seller until the buyer is confirmed to have received the item.
Go to
Nov 26, 2018 19:55:16   #
How does paypal work with individual transactions? I send payment, but what assurance do I have that the lens will arrive? (Not implying anything, just wondering the process).
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 105 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.