I wonder what a bobbie would look like according to AI.
Learning something every day...
joer wrote:
R we looking at the same images?
Yup. I just realized (my mistake) that it was 'Old English Villages' so driving on the wrong side of the road is really the right side...
#3 No driver, the seat is empty, check it out.
#3 White lines on the road, lower left.
#2 Half of the horse is missing. No back legs
#1 The carriage is not in a turning position, it seems to be following a straight line...
As to the horses... They are 'percherons' wannabe. Those horses are massive. AI added the 'socks' but forgot how powerful these beasts are...
BebuLamar wrote:
That is for the Nikon version. The OP has the Canon version.
The specs and features would be the same. This is an aftermarket, so doubtful it will be 'different'.
#3 No human despite a table being set, two carriages, one blatantly with no driver... AI has learned to hate humans!!! Did you specify England? Both carriages are on the wrong side of the road! Anachronism... Paint on the road...
#2 Half a horse!
#1 This about to be a rough ride... Seems to be going over the grass...
Sinewsworn wrote:
What kind of comment is that?
Nothing important, just a pesky fly who does nothing other than buzz around the poop of its own making.
I ignore all its comment.
One missed occasion to post in the gallery.
It is spring there too.
Over exposed, B&W rendition is atrocious.
All hands on deck!!!! (only if you are old, decrepit and if you have too many fingers)
Do post an original w/o any post-processing and in the WEBP format. It will appear as a link but will be viewable once the download is used.
Your images are sharp. They look a bit over processed. You might want to post the unprocessed image, so one can see w/o the post-production interference.
I am not sure what the pushback is about, it is not justified.
many users wrote:
.../... sharpness comment .../...
You folks need to learn to download the image BEFORE making comments.
See the little + on your screen after you download? That allows yo to see the image close-up.
Remember the guy with:
WE GOT A JUMPER???
Too many around my place, these things are destructive and eat whatever, including bird's eggs.
Personally, I shoot them.
Good for stew but very little meat if roasted.
In the last couple of years, I have collected around 50 tails... One no later than last week.
Note that the UK recognize this specie as aggressive, and a danger to their native squirrels. The result is that they are trying to exterminate them with some success. Since the female reproduces twice a year and has 4 to 6 pups...
BAchme wrote:
I finally need to purchase the Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom bundle. Is it better to do the monthly or, the yearly subscription? I assume purchasing from Adobe is best.
Any insight here before I make a purchase?
Thanks!
Yearly. This avoids interruptions if your CC is ever compromised.
Your choice should be dictated by your wallet.
shutterhawk wrote:
I've been using PSE 2018 since it came out and it's served me well. Still works as good as new but is getting to be a bit long of tooth and I'm guessing there've been some improvements. Adobe is offering me a 30% discount on the 2034 version so I'd like hear what others think of the edition.
You will have to wait 10 years to get feedback on that one... (j/k)
Previous post (GAS and use) is right on.