Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Joyfullee
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 317 next>>
Nov 14, 2013 23:13:52   #
magicray wrote:
You win.


Love you, blessings! :-)

As a side note, my case about the little 4 1/2 year old is a true story.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 21:32:07   #
magicray wrote:
Being a Christian is not a prerequisite for teaching a child what right and wrong is. Children learn what’s right and wrong by interpreting feedback from their parents and other significant adults in their lives.

How many years of going to the store would instill his knowledge of what was actually going on. Are far as he knew mommy was just putting her groceries on a table to be bagged. He was only a baby. Take 100 4 1/2 year olds and let then loose in a supermarket without any instructions other than in a half hour leave the store. How many would leave with candy, toys with no feelings of guilt or wrong doing? You don’t have to teach your child to walk – he’ll figure that out on his own. But left to his own devices, he won’t develop a conscience.
Experts say a child's conscience begins to develop after the age five.
Being a Christian is not a prerequisite for teachi... (show quote)


If a parent takes his/her child to the store, it isn't long before they realize that things have to be paid for. Stand in any checkout line and sooner or later you'll see a parent asking for the child to give them the "whatever" so that they can pay for it and telling them they can have it back as soon as it's been paid for.

The boy in my example told his mother that he put the candy in his pocket and it wasn't paid for. So he understood the concept, things have to be paid for.

Your example doesn't work. You said put 100 4 1/2 year old's in a store without any instructions other than they get to leave in a half hour.

Is this the first time they've ever been in a store?

There are stores that do special things like allow a group of children to go through the store and pick out something they get to keep.

According to your rules, they would have nothing to feel guilty about, but this was not the case in my example.

Experience itself proves the "experts" wrong, as does my example. The boy wasn't even 5 years old yet and yet he stated that he "felt bad," and he "thought he had done a bad thing."

Children learn much from observing the adults in their world, without a word being spoken. As in the case I stated.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 17:54:07   #
Bangee5 wrote:
I was scuba Diving off the beach of John Loyd State Park in Dania Beach, FL. When I got back to the beach I had tossed my flippers at the waters edge. While I was slipping off my tank and vest this little Cuban boy ran over and snatched up my flippers. He ran back to his mother who was waiting for him but watching me with a smile on her face. She had encouraged her son to steal. She rushed him back to a group of other Cubans having a party. I could not believe that a mother could teach her own son to steal. She had made a choice for her son not to respect the property of others but to steal if given a chance.
I was scuba Diving off the beach of John Loyd Stat... (show quote)


This kid's conscience was silenced at a very early age (through no fault of his own) through the joy of pleasing his mother.

Good example Bangee.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 17:47:36   #
magicray wrote:
COI Jack wrote:
What about the kid who does not tell his mother and eats the candy and steals again. Where is his God-given conscience?So you are saying that a 4 1/2 year has a god given conscience and even knows how to silence it? :shock:


Exactly. Did the boy have to tell his Mom? No. It was how he felt that caused him to tell on himself.

Just like the other poster brought up, some kids steal and steal again and again. Why? Because they have learned to silence their own conscience. If a kid knew his mother would not let him have the candy because they didn't have the money, he would steal it and keep it hidden because the desire for the candy would override or silence his conscience. It doesn't mean his conscience wasn't pricked (guilty feelings) but just that having the candy was more important than how the stealing made him feel. Within himself he justified his actions for stealing. Each and every time thereafter, it just becomes easier, because each time he silences his conscience, it becomes harder or a bit more seared. After years of this, his conscience isn't even pricked any more, at least not when it comes to stealing.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 17:26:24   #
magicray wrote:
Probably not unless his parents taught him at home society's unacceptance of taking something that is not yours and owned by others. Right and wrong has nothing to do with the existence of a god or a devil. It is more a result of social mores. For some reason he knew what he did wasn't right and told his mother he had done a bad thing.

I would guess his motivation was that mom would find out and his father would escort him to a trip behind the wood pile. A 4 1/2 year old would not have the brain development to understand right from wrong on his own. He needed outside influences to make that decision. Not so much a guilt trip but a fear of being punished. His belief in a god at that age would only come from his parent's influence on him and not through any unconscience, subconscience or conscience thought process.
Probably not unless his parents taught him at home... (show quote)


For some reason...I think it was the years of going to the store with Mom/Dad and understanding that all the stuff you want, goes on the counter to the cashier to be paid for. He understood that concept.

When he told his Mom he felt bad and thought he had done something wrong, he did not say, I stole. What he said was he put it in his pocket and it wasn't paid for. So he understood the concept of stealing, though could not plainly state that.

I don't think a 4 year old has the manipulative abilities to think about maybe he could be "caught." His mother did not know he stole something, the boy offered up the information because of how he felt. So it was how he felt, (he felt bad, or in other words, guilty) that was his motivation for telling. He did not like how it made him feel. Which was guilty. Which was his conscience speaking to him.

His parents are not Christians, so no influence from that angle.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 15:31:42   #
COI Jack wrote:
What about the kid who does not tell his mother and eats the candy and steals again. Where is his God-given conscience?


He has been learning how to silence his conscience.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 15:29:00   #
Wellhiem wrote:
You are assuming the existence of a God given conscience in order to support your theory that a God given conscience exists. That is the definition of a circular argument.


Was that little 4 1/2 year old assuming that God existed when he felt bad and thought he'd done something wrong?
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 15:04:11   #
Wellhiem wrote:
Not at all. He CHOSE to tell his mother what he'd done because he BELIEVED it was wrong. He didn't choose to believe it was wrong.


His God given conscience told him it was wrong. His choice was to trust his conscience or silence (sear/harden) it through self-justification or rationalization.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 14:59:07   #
COI Jack wrote:
Bangee, could you choose to follow Islam? Why not?
Now, do you understand?


I'm not Bangee :-) but I'd like to answer your question Jack.

The option/choice is available or open to me to make that choice.

I would choose not to because my personal experience/relationship with God has grown to the point that I trust Him above all else.

I choose to believe God because He has proved Himself to me and that His Word, the Holy Bible is to be trusted for guidance.

The religion of Islam is in contradiction of God's Word.
Go to
Nov 14, 2013 14:33:27   #
Wellhiem wrote:
Subconscious choice in an oxymoron. If it happens in the subconscious, then there is no choice involved.


Not really.

Our God given conscience is being left out of all equations here.

A 4 1/2 year old boy goes shopping with his mother and as she is in the checkout lane, the little boy slips a candy bar into his pocket. By the time they get to their car, the little boy informs his mother that he doesn't feel very good and that he thinks he has done something "bad." So his story gets told and Mom takes him back into the store to return the stolen item. The little boys conscience has led him to do what is right.

As we grow, that conscience can become seared/hardened through rationalization or self-justification of wrong doing or sins. The older we become, the harder it becomes, so that we reach a point where our consciences no longer work as they were originally created to work.

Now, taking the example of two people reading the Bible and one will believe and another will not....is because one person possess a still working conscience and the other does not. The one who does not, will most likely dismiss it altogether without much thought, because his hardened/seared conscience will not be convicted by the message.

As for the illustration of the cheating wife, that doesn't even make sense. Of course he made a conscious decision to no longer trust his wife because the facts prove that she is not to be trusted, regardless of what he previously believed.

On the other hand, how many spouses that have found themselves in the same circumstances have chosen to make excuses for the cheating spouse through a multitude of excuses on their behalf. They choose to rationalize or justify the infidelity, regardless of their previous belief. The facts haven't changed, but they choose a different path. (Ex.) It didn't mean anything, he really loves me. It was just a moment of weakness, it was the other women's fault. He won't do it again...the list goes on and on. In all cases, it was a choice, regardless of the fact that they believed their spouse was not a cheater. We can also look at the one who chooses to forgive and live with it.

Belief of anything at all is a choice. Many times predicated without much or any thought at all because of a seared or hardened conscience; or in other words, the subconscious at work. Which is only the manifestation of a clear and working conscience or a seared and hardened one.
Go to
Nov 13, 2013 15:47:28   #
rebride wrote:
Agreed, thanks for the clarification. I was going to do a counter point.
Instead let me turn you on some songs from my go to album. Avalon Sunset by Van Morrison.
It can lift one's spirit, bring a tear to the eye, and often knock (rock??) you on your knees.
Whenever God Shines His Light -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuzVwiL1i5M
This is most often taken as just a generic love song, used at weddings, but is actually a prayer of thanks. -
http://vimeo.com/37545720
Transformation -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-JozqMdsBY
Agreed, thanks for the clarification. I was going ... (show quote)


I've never heard that first song before and I loved everything about it. It was bold and clear in the lyrics and the music was very beautiful to my ears.

Thanks for sharing.

Blessings :-)
Go to
Nov 13, 2013 14:09:38   #
rebride wrote:
Yes. Although it just pointed out certain individuals I was not sure whether it was also a general statement against all rock and roll?


In my opinion, no.

Good or evil can be manifested through most everything in life.
Go to
Nov 13, 2013 13:42:50   #
rebride wrote:
Is this a general damnation of all rock and roll? That all rock and roll is Satan inspired?


Did you view the video?
Go to
Nov 12, 2013 14:44:53   #
COI Jack wrote:
I find the whole concept of God sacrificing his son hard to believe. God is all powerful. God is all loving. God allowed his son to die a hideous death for what

I couldn't do that to one of my kids. The rest of the world would just have to go to hell.

Does that make me more loving than God, or less? I guess it depends on your viewpoint.


One, Jesus volunteered Himself, He sacrificed Himself. Why? Because He had been with God since the beginning and knew the love God (and He) had for all people.

Jesus knew/understood the Holiness/righteousness of God. Sin (darkness/the absence of light or God) is the opposite of God's holiness. He also understood the infectious nature of sin. Sin entered the world through one man, Adam.

Through Jesus, the only man without sin, righteousness entered the world. Jesus never sinned. He did and said only those things He heard from His Father, who was leading and guiding him in all things.

When Jesus was on that cross, God poured out the consequences/punishment for all sin upon him. The wages of sin is death. The only one who did not justly or rightly deserve it.

Jesus died in our place, for those who believe and accept His sacrifice of Himself for ourselves.

Now, just as Jesus was led by His Father in all He did and said, that same opportunity is given us, through the indwelling Holy Spirit that is given to born again believers.

Jhn 3:7
Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

Rom 8:14
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

The righteousness that Jesus possessed, is now imputed to born again believers.

There are no "works" that we can do to gain entrance to eternal life. There is only the work of Jesus on the cross, on our individual behalf and the acceptance of that work that grants us access to eternal life.

It is the righteousness of Christ, imputed to us and through obedience to the indwelling Holy Spirit that gets anyone to heaven.

Our love for our children can not even begin to equal the love God has for all people. Our love is marred, imperfect through our sin, but God's love is absolutely pure.

Through the death of Jesus on the cross, God Himself made a way, through the sin, (the wages of sin is death) to take us unto Himself for a holy family that will one day dwell with Him for all eternity.
Go to
Nov 11, 2013 12:39:40   #
Croce wrote:
And you probably think the Lord of The Rings is fantasy. What a hypocrite!

How old are you Joyfullee? 14?


Abundant blessings Croce. :-)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 317 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.