Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: flashgordonbrown
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 26 next>>
Aug 28, 2018 17:00:52   #
Chaostrain wrote:
I've spent a lot of time studying the "rules" of photography from many different experts. I studied the rule of thirds, the rule of lighting, the rule of shake your left leg three times, spin right twice, jump once, and howl at a full moon on a Tuesday. I studied the rules for macro photography which happens to look like the rules for landscapes and nightscapes and portraits and photography in general. Oh, let's not forget the final all the experts tell you at the very end, that's break all the rules.

I've come to the to the following conclusion; there are no rules, zero, zip, nada, the big goose egg! The real title should be Here's a list of things to mess with to help you learn your camera until you figure out what you want to do.

Photography is an art! The photographer is an artist! It's totally up to the artist to decide what to do and how far to take their art. Anything anybody says is merely a suggestion of what that person would like to see.

Yes, I'll still look at what others are doing and saying. I've come across many suggestions to try or at least spark a part of my imagination. Sometimes one leads to the another.

Whether you shoot for a base for a picture maker or for straight out of the camera or to simply record a moment in time to prompt your memory later or whatever else, own it like a boss, cause it's all good.

So on that note. I'm going back to playing with my camera and look forward to seeing what others create. As for the rules? What rules? I don't know no stinkin rules.
I've spent a lot of time studying the "rules&... (show quote)


Rules, like recipes, are starting points!
Go to
Aug 28, 2018 16:57:49   #
robertjerl wrote:
There are two rules that are absolute.
1. turn the camera on (implies having charged batteries in the camera)
2. take the lens cap off
OH YEAH!!! make that three = have a lens on the camera


How about a 4th-make sure there's a card in the slot with room for the number of images you plan to make!
Go to
Aug 28, 2018 16:10:46   #
Chalybeateman wrote:
I had a neighbor give me this lens from an estate sale. At first I thought it was an old manual focus Minolta lens but it would not fit my A mount Sony.TO a

In the front it says Five Star mc Auto Macro Zoom 1:45 75-200 mm 52 and the serial numberin

What mount is this? On the side it says made in Japan.


The reason that it won't fit your A mount camera is that it was made to fit pre-auto focus Minolta cameras. They used either MC or MD designation. They were basically interchangeable, with the MD lenses having more features that could be utilized by later model Minolta cameras.The A mount was introduced with the release of the first auto - focus slr, the Minolta 7000. There is an adapter made to mount MC/MD LENSES to A mount cameras, but it is like using a low magnification Tele extender.
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 20:25:58   #
SteveR wrote:
So, what they did is put two images on each 24x36 frame?ati


As has been explained by several other posters, film was transported through the camera vertically, but thend frame was horizontal. Olympus made a line of half - frame still cameras where the film was transported horizontally, but the image was vertical The cameras were inovative for their time, and had the advantage of giving the user twice as many images on a roll offilm!
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 20:08:19   #
kymarto wrote:
A lens hood does not stop the front element from getting dirty and having to be cleaned, which inevitably leads to scratches eventually unless one is super careful in the field.


Actually, modern coatings prevent scratches to the front elements of lenses. 30 years ago, when I was a salesman in a retail camera store, the Olympus sales rep would demonstrate the hardness of their multi-coating by dropping his keys on the front element of their fish eye lens. That was a bit extreme, but effective in getting the point across!
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 17:50:23   #
flashgordonbrown wrote:
In the first paragraph of the Wikipedia article it clearly states that the standard size used by the motion picture industry was 'SINGLE FRAME'! Pay more attention to your source of information!


Also,as previously stated, 'single frame' and 'half frame' refer to the same format.
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 17:47:58   #
SteveR wrote:
Why do I dispute what you posted? Read the following. I could find nothing for half frame and movies. It's not as though I didn't look. You're free to provide sources that would enlighten us otherwise. They weren't apparent in Google.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/35_mm_film


In the first paragraph of the Wikipedia article it clearly states that the standard size used by the motion picture industry was 'SINGLE FRAME'! Pay more attention to your source of information!
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 17:35:26   #
SteveR wrote:
Do a little more research.


What do you dispute in what I posted? I speak from having extensive experience in the photo industry. While there were some commercial films shot on 70mm most were single, or half frame (same thing, just different terminology ). Full frame, or double frame (again, the same thing) is primarily the format that 35mm still cameras use, as standardized by early Leica cameras and subsequently adopted by the camera mfg industry.
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 17:04:57   #
SteveR wrote:
4x5 or 8x10 are specialty cameras, whereas 35mm was the standard for the cameras most used by avid amateur photographers as well as professional journalists, etc. (think of Vietnam). 35mm was also standard for motion picture movie making for the most part. So...35 mm would be considered a "full frame," as compared to smaller negatives which were not. Larger negatives and cameras were given their own appellations. 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 was considered a medium format. Other formats were called large format.
4x5 or 8x10 are specialty cameras, whereas 35mm wa... (show quote)


Actually, 'single frame' or as it was also known, 'half frame', was the standard for commercial movies, thus the terms 'double frame' and 'full frame' for the 24x36 image size.
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 16:32:10   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
I think you are misinformed. The lenses themselves are glass. The body of the lenses might be made out of either metal or plastic. Only very cheap or toy cameras like the Diana or Holga have plastic lenses.


Not completely true - some lenses have both acrylic elements as well as glass elements. As has been pointed out in another response, acrylic is commonly used in high quality eyeware, and has for many years in combination with glass in quality camera lenses. This from many years of camera retail sales, ending more than 25 years ago! In the interim, I have maintained close contact with the industry as a professional photographer.
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 16:18:23   #
rjaywallace wrote:
No, there are some great cameras with APS-C sensors out there. Look at Fuji, Nikon and Canon.


Sony before any of the other brands!
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 16:09:05   #
markngolf wrote:
I've posted a few images and comments about my Sony RX 10 IV. I have so much to learn about the camera.
OK, how many of your would admit to these f--- ups?
1. Took 200 images in Prague, in extremely hot weather (90+ degrees), and discover I had no card inserted. BTW: they were wonderful images.
2. Took about the same number of images in Vienna and discovered no card in the camera.
3. My wife was sick in Budapest so we spent a day in the hotel room. No images.
4. We had one more day after our tour ended (today). Hired a private driver and guide to take us around the city, specifically for photo scenes and vantage viewpoints. He was terrific and added history of the country as we drove from site to site. Fabulous sites!!! Fabulous images!! Get back to hotel, paid him $180 & a $40 gratuity for three hours. Could not wait to get back to hotel room to review the images. Guess what? No images!! For the 3rd time, NO Card!!
I could not understand why I did not receive a "no card" warning and how the camera took images without a card. Took out the book (Alexander White) and discoverd I had not enabled the feature in the voluminous menu. DUH!! DUH!!. My father, only in jest, used to day to me, "you're getting dumber by the day"! He was right

No lectures please or how to prevent such mistakes. I've been whipped enough.

I'll soon recover and forgive myself.
Mark
I've posted a few images and comments about my Son... (show quote)


While you think you have been 'whipped enough' I feel the need to jump in. If as you say, this happened once in a situation where it would be impossible to find the same photo opportunities, it would behoove you to, as a matter of course, to check your card slot each time you start out the day. I've not been in your exact situation, but I have been in a similar situation, finding that images I thought that I had didn't exist upon CHECKING. Fortunately, I was. near a retail store and was able to get a card and go back and duplicate the shots (8 or so), and continue on with my day. Keep in mind that these where images for a client!
Go to
Aug 16, 2018 12:20:31   #
GeorgeH wrote:
Actually Hal, the country lost. We will be many years in undoing the damage that Mr Trump has already done, and should he win or buy a second term.........


Actually, George, the 'years in undoing' will undoing the mess that BO created!
Go to
Aug 15, 2018 17:23:00   #
jcs wrote:
You're right .
Just take a look at our inner cities now.
Under Obama , they all used to be "Gardens of Eden " , the envy of the world .
And now look at the SHIT HOLES.
Murder, rape, mugging, robbing, looting, burning......
So far , just this YEAR alone, more blacks got murdered by other blacks than in the entire 150 + History of the KKK .
And it's ALL because of that RACIST Donald Trump and his "vacuum brained " Conservative voters .lol

I'm not sure what 'rose-colored'glasses you're looking through! Detroit, Chicago, Houston., Los Angeles, etc etc, have been hell-holes for many decades, all the while under Democratic Party control. I guess if it doesn't fit your narrative, it can't be true! And where do you come up with 'racist' describing a man honored by the NAACP at the same time that Rosa Parks was honored? !?
Go to
Aug 15, 2018 17:03:56   #
GeorgeH wrote:
Mr Trump (I refuse to call him President Trump. That would debase the Office!) has succeeded in populating the West Wing and the Cabinet with a remarkable assortment of scum suckers and bottom feeders, and that disparages honorable catfish and carp and crabs.


Well, you can deny reality all you wany, but that doesn't change the FACT that Donald Trump is the President of the USA! I wasn't too enamored with the last occupant of the office, but I never denied the fact that he was President. Put on your big boy briefs/boxers and try dealing with reality!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 26 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.