Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: photeach
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Apr 8, 2012 11:31:55   #
I'll use the "B" word that makes parents shiver:

BRACES!

MWAC wrote:
SteveR wrote:
I'm not talking about leaving the kids money....I'm talking about all the money it costs to raise them. MWAC...you haven't even gotten to the college years yet!!


There goes that 1969 Camaro I had my eye on... stupid kids, first they want to eat, have clothes that fit and now you tell me they will want me to send them to COLLEGE?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Go to
Apr 5, 2012 10:20:16   #
Nice work. My favorite is the pinecone frieze above the double windows.
Go to
Apr 3, 2012 10:13:58   #
Sorry. My fault for reacting so strongly. It's just my really strong reaction to the way the man/woman looked, and my concern for how my high school female students would perceive the photo.I can't be a photographer first in this situation. Sorry to get us off-topic.
Brucej67 wrote:
The conversation sure has taken an ugly turn from photography to human rights. My belief system is that abuse whether it is man or woman, religious, racial or sexual preference is wrong. Everyone should be treated as equal individuals; however the discussion on the photographer’s ability to create an alternate perspective and do it well has been overlooked.
Go to
Apr 3, 2012 08:40:34   #
Wow! A photo of a woman with hollow cheeks, worried expression on her face, eyes that look blackened, general emaciated look to her, and it's a man masQuerading as a woman. Does our society have any love of the female gender? If I show this photo to my teenaged daughter, there will have to be a bit of talk about why our society seems to want to starve and beat women.
The concept is interesting; but the reality is disturbing.
English_Wolf wrote:
This is a NPR photography of a man.

http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2012/02/23/ap120127041800_wide.jpg?t=1333371754&s=4

If you pay attention you realize that the photographer and the crew around him made sure that any aspect of him as a man was hidden using posing and only posing.

A such, it is a lesson to be learned.

Would I see this 'woman' in the street, I would go "Wow!'

Link to the article and credits:
http://www.npr.org/2012/04/02/147290180/fashions-new-it-girl-and-boy-andrej-pejic
This is a NPR photography of a man. br br img ht... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 1, 2012 00:02:06   #
One more idea: Why don't you get a 50 mm 1.8 and work the hell out of it? Can it possibly do what you want it to? Try it in manual, and change up the ISO, the shutter speed, the aperture all over the place. And if it doesn't perform, you're out $100 or $200. Then how about a 35 mm or an 85 mm? Can you really bump up your performance with one of those before you spend the big bucks?
It's nice to have great gear, but it's trippy to know you have sharpened your skills with what you have. Good luck!
jrlatham4567 wrote:
I tried indoor basketball photography and got unacceptable results. I use a Canon 24-105 f4.5 L lens. I opened the camera all the way to f 4.5 and to ISO 6400 and still got streaking. There was also a lot of light reflection off the floor. The question is: what is the secret to good photos in this setting?
Go to
Mar 31, 2012 23:52:54   #
Nice! You do a lot better job of focusing on the faces than I do. I seem to get stuck focusing on the uniform numbers with the face just a little out of focus. It is not easy for me to remember to stay focused on the face. Nice shot.
Semprasectum wrote:
JMHO, but you can't possibly get quality shots with that lens. . . period. Shooting indoor sports is only possible with the right equipment. . . I don't know what your situation is, but using that lens and getting any sort of passible basketball shot is just not, IMO, possible. You simple have to find a lens, 2.8 or better.

I shoot with a 200mmf/2.0VRII on a Nikon D3s.

just so you know I am on the level . . . .:

www.flickr.com/photos/59316697@N06/6824280442/in/photostream :thumbup:
JMHO, but you can't possibly get quality shots wit... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 31, 2012 09:04:52   #
Can you stand on the endline? Much better images there with them coming towards the basket, rather than the players running side to side. I shoot with a D3100, 85 mm f/1.8 lens, on shutter priority, usually about 250 or 400. Expect to get a 1 good image in every 5.
Keep shooting, and follow the team out of town. Some gyms have better lighting. Most don't, which is why they are nicknamed things like the Snakepit and the Barn.

jrlatham4567 wrote:
I tried indoor basketball photography and got unacceptable results. I use a Canon 24-105 f4.5 L lens. I opened the camera all the way to f 4.5 and to ISO 6400 and still got streaking. There was also a lot of light reflection off the floor. The question is: what is the secret to good photos in this setting?
Go to
Mar 25, 2012 12:01:35   #
Make sure you video your dissection and stick it on YouTube. It could go viral.
Blind us with science!
Go to
Mar 17, 2012 20:21:09   #
I feel the creepy crawlies after viewing your photos. Super!
I'm starting to see the attraction of macro. Hope I can avoid the addiction.
Go to
Mar 12, 2012 08:22:13   #
One reason I like teaching photo so much is it's so easy to show the link between altering your thinking and creating something new and far more meaningful.
I realized that when I took an eye-level shot of my toddler for the first time. I thought to myself: "I am never going to shoot this kid from adult-level again." And, I have shots I still love to look at 15 years later.
I tell my students to shoot, think a little differently, and shoot again. It makes a world of difference.
It helped with my depression issues, too. Good luck!
Go to
Mar 5, 2012 09:00:39   #
You can learn a lot by scouting the internet for other people's photos. Both of your photos could be improved by a different angle on your horse -- one where the horse had a little room to "run" in the photo and wasn't bumping up against the edge of the photo. I also think an angle that shows both eyes of the horse but also some of its flank -- the 45º angle. And that won't cost anything. Still I vote for the Nikon d3100.
Go to
Mar 5, 2012 08:16:33   #
Another vote for the Nikon D3100 -- excellent color images with little work, and since I began experimenting with the manual mode, things get sharper and sharper.
Go to
Mar 4, 2012 01:12:29   #
Yay! All those people who have enormously expensive cameras with terribly costly lenses at sporting events but take all photos on Auto will now have somewhere else to spend their excess cash: monthly payments for software they can't be bothered to learn to use.
This grab for the cash seems terribly shortsighted on the part of Adobe, but this is how they get their name in front of everyone.
1. Publicize a stupid business decision.
2. Watch as everyone reacts negatively to poor decision.
3. Retract poor decision with unconvincing apology.
4. Congratulate team members on free publicity. Collect stock options.
Go to
Mar 2, 2012 10:37:21   #
A. Number 2 is my favorite. It shows that little kid skin nicely. B. Number 3 could be improved by going vertical. (My tombstone will read "Go Vertical!") That way we could see the bunny thing she is holding.
C. I agree that Number 1 has a "hot window." Get your model away from the window, or wasn't she working with you that day?
D. Count your blessings that you have that sweet little kid in your life.
Go to
Feb 27, 2012 23:19:27   #
Wonderful twist on leading lines where the lines are coming from above. I love the orange and blue contrasting colors. Very satisfying!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.