Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: hondo812
Page: <<prev 1 ... 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 next>>
Feb 27, 2014 23:33:47   #
Photographer Jim wrote:
The problem with that question is that it attempts to classify marriage as primarily a religious institution rather than a civil one. I can get married in any state in this Union without any involvement by the church. The church does not need to recognize my marriage for it to be valid. One can not however have a legal marriage without a government issued license.

This is not something new. It is not a situation where suddenly the government has jumped in and tried to wrestle away authority over marriages from the church.
The problem with that question is that it attempts... (show quote)


No, I didn't say it was something new. However, it dawns on me that the Pilgrims likely did not have a license to wed because their establishment as a colony had a minimalist government. When they did wed they were being joined before God per their religious convictions. So I am wondering, when exactly and where did local, state, federal government get involved in marriage?
Go to
Feb 27, 2014 22:49:41   #
CaptainC wrote:
Yeah - I knew someone would bring up the No Shirt, No Shoes thing. It took longer than I thought.

That is posted at the door and applies equally to EVERYONE and it is defensible on safety and sanitary reasons. Refusing service to any of the protected classes is illegal. I cannot recall the list but it includes religion, race, sexual orientation, national origin, veteran status, and several more. Barefoot and bare chests are not included. Nice try, but you do not know the law.

Your statement that groups want approval is wrong - they just want to be treated equally. You do not have to "approve" anything, just treat them as you would anyone else.

Lincoln's quote has noting to do with this issue. You have it wrong anyway - it is not about "pleasing people" it is about "fooling people."
Yeah - I knew someone would bring up the No Shirt,... (show quote)


Not sure just what you are trying to get at regarding "no shirt, no shoes, no service". I was merely pointing out that a legitimate business can indeed refuse service. Bars are required (in my state anyways) to shut off customers if they are too inebriated. These same types of establishments can give people the boot for inappropriate behavior..being loud, obnoxious, swearing, causing damage..the list goes on.

The other gentleman is correct in that in both recent cases, the baker and photographer are being asked to participate in something that they find morally objectionable or offensive or just something they would prefer to avoid. So that isn't quite the same as selling someone a newspaper and they are on their merry way is it?

You are correct about please vs fool. So Lincoln didn't say that. My bad. Doesn't make it any less true.

As for group X looking for validation or equality....you have your opinion and I have mine.

The question people should be asking is when did government in this country insert itself into the religious institution of marriage? And by what right?
Go to
Feb 26, 2014 10:45:33   #
seriously?

Am I the only one that has ever read the sign...
No shoes
No shirt
No Service!

That is a business owners right to refuse service.

You want to dress like a homeless person but be served in a posh restaurant? good luck! It won't matter if you are white, black, or polka dotted.

Now then, discriminating based on race is and should be a crime but you had better have proof that it was racial and not some cultural "pants around the ankles" routine.

As for gays, I can understand that a business owner might want to decline to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding. I think we all read the article. Go to a different baker already. I used to know a gay baker. I bet he would have loved to take care of that customers order. But how does one discriminate against gays? They aren't wearing a stamp on their head that says GAY are they?

As an engineer I have had to outsource work through the years especially machine shop work. I have a pretty good idea what the work will cost but the companies I have worked for almost always require 3 quotes. The ones that come back 150% or more than the others don't want your business and I don't give it to them. Were they discriminating? Why would I care? I got the parts I needed and on budget which is all I ever wanted.

It seems to me that the larger issue is for demographic group X to have approval from all demographics of their lifestyle, culture, etc. That just isn't going to happen. There will always be someone who thinks so and so's hair is too long, or too fat, too thin, too religious, too atheist, too "fill in the blank". What was it that Lincoln said? "You can please some of the people some of the time all of the people some of the time some of the people all of the time but you can never please all of the people all of the time.”
Go to
Feb 24, 2014 09:22:11   #
Very nice. I think I like #3 the best. Whereabouts in California? It's a big place you know.
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 09:57:54   #
I have PSE and LR at home to edit photos I take for enjoyment. I have Picasa at work for editing photos for making manufacturing procedures. I have used all 3 though not as much on PSE. For general brightening or darkening Picasa can get it done though I have found that LR does a better job once you figure out presets.

Actually Picasa has quite a few nice little features in it but Google has a tendency to upgrade this software without much warning and for some it drops their favorite features as it recently did with it's picnik addon. The point being that while some updates are an improvement some may not be. Of course the same can be said for any of the software mentioned, though you have a lot more control over the various purchased software versus the freeware.

At the end of the day, if you are looking for a quick and dirty edit to a picture or 2...go with Picasa. If you plan on editing 20 or more go with one of the adobe products.

I plan on giving the FastStone editor a look. I use the FastStone Capture software at work for collecting screenshots which ends up being a nice way to get the views I want for developing software centric procedures. The fact that it is portable on a USB thumbdrive is a major benefit.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 10:43:53   #
Nice shot. I like it without the branches as well.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 10:25:27   #
RichieC wrote:
Japanese interviewed have stated that if they had the bomb, they would have used it. They experimented widely with weapons of mass destruction, most notably in biological warfare. Chinese to this day, die of bubonic plague, which can be traced genetically to strains the Japanese used in experiments on deploying the disease. They could never figure out a way of distributing it. One instance, the infected bat houses they tried to float in the jet stream to the US, froze to death at altitude. They figured they would spread out once they hit the mainland and plague would spread.

AND you forget the Japanese attitude toward Gaijin, We were barbarians- beneath animals... The were extremely cruel to prisoners, showed no mercy at all, made the Nazis look like nice guys. They were preparing for the US invasion of their mainland by teaching anyone who could hold a sharpened stick to attack any American soldier... old men, children- the bombs saved millions of lives, and a large number of our soldiers- my dad was getting ready to be shipped out from Italy to Japan when they ended it. It would have been irresponsible and criminal not to use them the option to sacrifice American lives. instead. Now thinkof the card Roosevelt played.. he had two bombs, and months away from any more. yet he used them both in fast succession- to give the Japanese the impression we could keep this up forever... He bluffed them. Proof he wanted them to end the war right now.

They believed we would roast and eat their children.

Cut and pasted by an eye witness. ( Link at end for rest of interview)


"WTJ: You also ended up witnessing some of the tragic suicides which happened at the cliffs. I hate to ask, but were they as shocking as I've heard?
Gabaldon: Many Japs, both military and civilians, committed suicide. It was sad to see children struggling with their parents pleading not to be thrown off the cliffs - "Please father, do not kill me. I do not want to die!" These parents were dangerous, desperate people who wanted nothing more than to kill the "American Savages" who they thought would roast and eat their children. "Hurley, look at all those people lined up at the edge of the cliff! They're jumping off by the numbers. My God, man, we've got to stop them. Let's go."

One group was about two hundred yards away from us. I shouted at them as we ran. "Tomare, tomare - seppuku shinaide. Kodomo korosanaide. Dozo, korosanaide.! " I'm begging them to stop killing their children. But I can see that as we approach they jump off in greater numbers. "Hurley, stop. If we get any closer they'll all jump off. I'll try talking to them again."

As we stop we can see four children thrown off. They were pleading with their parents not to kill them. It seems that the children had more faith in us than did their parents. There were about fifty in that group - it seems that there are about ten left. One who apparently is a leader is yelling at the rest I can't make out what he's saying but it is obvious that he's telling them not to surrender. The people look down at the rocks below and see their friends moaning down there. Just about then one of them grabs an infant and tosses him off. That seems to have been a signal because they all start jumping off. In a couple of minutes it's all over. The whole bunch lies down below either dead or dying.

Before leaving Saipan, I went to the Stockade to bid adios to the many people I knew there. There were actually hundreds who I had personally saved from sure death. One guy, Shimabukuro, was a special friend, and he had become my personal barber. "Guy-san, before you leave us, I want you to see someone here who you saved from jumping over the cliff. Do you remember that woman you grabbed right after she had thrown her baby to the rocks down below. The people who were there say that she screamed and fought you, but you held her down. Well, she lost her mind a few days after she was brought here to the stockade. It seems that when she realized that she had killed her child unnecessarily - that the Americans were not going to roast and eat the children - she became "hidari-maki" (lost her mind). Come I will take you to her." There she sat, motionless, just staring straight ahead. My God, what a pathetic sight. I should have let her join her baby that day at the cliffs.
This was truly the horror of war.
"


http://www.wtj.com/articles/gabaldon/
Japanese interviewed have stated that if they had ... (show quote)



Just to clarify....Truman gave the order. Roosevelt was dead at that point.
Go to
Feb 5, 2014 08:22:38   #
Lightroom is a great editor but there are some parts of the file management stuff that are confusing as all get out. I mean who coined the phrase workflow? They couldn't just call it file management?
Go to
Feb 3, 2014 08:56:43   #
Remember....These people vote and their crackerjack decision making affects us all!
Go to
Jan 31, 2014 10:26:18   #
PierreH wrote:
Thanks for dropping in and the links. As I said earlier, I can't see the make in front. It may well have been on the sides of the cowel over the motor.

Pierre


I did some digging and it looks like the McComick-Derring was produced by International Harvester. There should be a plaque above the radiator and a w-30 decal on the gas tank (directly in front of the seat). It appears that you could get this in either steel wheels or rubber tires, though for my money the steel wheels makes it more interesting. For what it's worth, I believe I have seen this model (or something a lot like it) in a Ken Burns documentary on the Dust Bowl.

As for the sulky (sp?) setup, it's been my experience that is usually associated with a 2 wheeled tractor similar to some of the older Gravely models

You could post your picture over at mytractorforum.com Someone over there will definitely know what it is the picture along with what the sulky setup goes to. Don't be too surprised if they want to know how much the owner wants though. :)

In any event, it's a fantastic photo.
Go to
Jan 30, 2014 21:12:23   #
looks a lot like these.
http://www.tractordata.com/farm-tractors/003/2/4/3244-mccormick-deering-w-30-photos.html

http://www.purplewave.com/cgi-bin/mnlist.cgi?111103/A2396

mid-30s, hand crank, metal wheels, w-30
Go to
Jan 30, 2014 10:12:49   #
excellent!
Go to
Jan 27, 2014 15:50:44   #
Very dramatic shot.

I had to look it up. That's on Mt. Greylock out in North Adams. It's the War Memorial Beacon. I have lived in MA all my life and only saw Mt. Greylock a few years ago. I have to tell you that it is quite something to see especially going west on RT 116.

Google mapped it and saw something quite unexpected there. Check it out! https://www.google.com/maps/preview/place/War+Memorial+Beacon/@42.6372398,-73.1660396,48m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xf56fa29238aef360

Look at the lower right of the map. You may need to zoom out.
A very popular motorcycle destination BTW.
Go to
Jan 25, 2014 16:18:21   #
I was just looking out the window at lunchtime and the solitary leaf in the snow caught my eye. I also liked the way the trees shadow seemed to reach out to it. After zooming in at the leaf it appears that only half the leaf is in the snow. The other half is shadow.

Canon T3i, 18-55 lens

Comments, suggestions, etc. are welcomed.


(Download)
Go to
Jan 25, 2014 16:13:03   #
I took this shot on 1/23/14 when it was close to 0 degrees through the bedroom window at about 4:30-5:00AM. First shot with the SX50.

Comments, suggestions, etc. are welcomed.


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.