Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Posts for: Opus
Nov 6, 2016 06:05:34 #
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-russia-hillary-clinton-united-states-europe-516895
Nov 5, 2016 21:09:53 #
https://electology.org/approval-voting
Nov 4, 2016 20:36:18 #
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Nov 3, 2016 13:54:11 #
dljen wrote:
Can't wait until this world straightens itself out. 
Probably not going to happen in my lifetime.
Nov 3, 2016 13:30:58 #
dirtpusher wrote:
How can this be. When they hadn't even looked them. Lol dream on.
I know you can read, I am speaking of the first investigation when the FBI said she was extremely careless. Here listen and pay attention.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/05/james-comey-hillary-clinton-email-investigation-full-statement.cnn
Quit taking left wing sites like Politico as gospel truth (right wing sites are just as bad).
Nov 3, 2016 12:50:26 #
Twardlow wrote:
Are you talking about the latest laptop emails? Cause you didn't read those, did you?
Six hundred thousand emails under security protection, classified. And you read them?
Hell, the FBI hasn't read them yet.
Six hundred thousand emails under security protection, classified. And you read them?
Hell, the FBI hasn't read them yet.
Read what I wrote, "I made my conclusions after reading the law and what the FBI said was contained in the emails." This is from their first investigation when they chose not to indict her. I never claimed to have read all of the emails.
Nov 3, 2016 11:53:57 #
John_F wrote:
Opus's opinion is exactly why potential jurors are so carefully examined. Opus has found quilt without evidence.
I made my conclusions after reading the law and what the FBI said was contained in the emails. I examined the evidence (as it was available to me) and drew my conclusions from that. It's okay for people to disagree but your statement that I found guilt without evidence is false.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Nov 3, 2016 10:18:28 #
dirtpusher wrote:
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/11/02/trump-just-got-dealt-a-stinging-blow-from-his-own-son-in-laws-newspaper/
Individual owners do not make the choice of who a paper endorses, it is usually done by the editorial board (except in Citizen Kane). People don't really care what candidates newspapers endorse. In fact 80% of the voter in this country don't even care who the candidates are, they just vote for the same party over and over again. Our system of government and the freedom to vote is taken much too lightly. People should exercise their voting rights with caution and by educating themselves, not by what some newspapers think.
Nov 3, 2016 09:00:24 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
As previously implied by Willheim; maybe, we will learn from this embarrassment.
God I hope so!
Nov 2, 2016 19:56:12 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
It is a lame excuse for not understanding where this country is going or where it should be going.
I don't respect it
I don't respect it
Well then you don't get it. You have the freedom to vote for what you believe is right, not just because somebody can win.
Just where do you think either one of the major candidates will lead us?
Somebody once told me that they were going to vote for Jimmy Carter because their family always voted Democrat and that is what 80% of the people do, vote for one party over and over. Perhaps when we start to look outside the big two parties we will finally find some solutions to our problems. Otherwise we are just voting for more of the same.
Nov 2, 2016 19:44:22 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
If both candidates are flawed, should not a voter support the one who is in alignment with his/her political and social beliefs?
There are serious differences between the messages and agendas of the two parties. It is not a high school popularity contest. Good God--wake up and read something!
Not "good for you"!
There are serious differences between the messages and agendas of the two parties. It is not a high school popularity contest. Good God--wake up and read something!
Not "good for you"!
If you know, feel, suspect that either one of the major party candidates will be a train wreck if elected voting third party is a protest against a failed two party system. Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. It is not up to you or me to criticize a persons vote. You can respect it even if you don't agree.
Nov 2, 2016 17:40:46 #
tramsey wrote:
I couldn't decide between Hillary or Trump who was... (show quote)
I respect that you voted your conscious.
Nov 2, 2016 11:50:03 #
dljen wrote:
Yes Opus. I answered you that Trump has been on the wrong side of an email scandal. He's destroyed them from various companies of his and said it was a mistake.
You will never see me defend Trump or Clinton.
Nov 2, 2016 11:30:14 #
dljen wrote:
Trump destroyed emails. Trump is being investigate... (show quote)
And you are saying all of this to me because????? I didn't comment on Trump, I was just addressing the OP's question.
Nov 2, 2016 08:53:26 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Guilty of what specific crime?
Read the OP's original post, she did destroy emails that would come under those statutes. What was on them may never be fully known. As I stated this is my opinion, not a statement of fact.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.