dustie wrote:
Maybe for a comparison, not necessarily to scale, but it may help get an idea.
Imagine yourself in a stream with a 120' long log, let's say, 8' in diameter. That log needs to be moved sideways to go through an opening between two pilings set in the river bed, but it is angled in the stream and heading toward one of the pilings, going off course, and it isn't very far from that piling.
At the speed it is travelling, it will be there in about 40 seconds.
Let's say it's only going 2.5 feet per second.
Now, you want to swim out there to the center of that log, push it straight sideways in the angled orientation that it has so it will go through that space between the pilings, without hitting either one, in less than 35-38 seconds.
If the way to sideways move, guide, control, shift, direct an object of 100,000+ tons, nearly one fifth of a mile long, whose lower edge is 40-50 feet below the surface of the water, using a little pusher of very diminutive size and weight, pushing only in the center of that wayward almost fifth of a mile long island, and get it done in 80 seconds or less, and not hit the.......
.......you're right !!!!!
They got nothing but numbskulls in those boats back there.....
......and after a few generations, they're only going downhill.
Maybe for a comparison, not necessarily to scale, ... (
show quote)
The weight or mass of the Dali has been mentioned in several posts. Usually the figure thrown around is about 100,000 tons. The figure usually quoted to indicate the size of merchant ships is "Gross Tonnage". The number I've seen for Dali is 95,128 so that seems to be the source for the 100,000 figure.
. "Displacement" figures tell you the weight of a ship but that number varies from Light Ship to Full Load. The total weight a ship can carry (cargo, fuel, stores, etc) is called the Deadweight Tonnage (DWT). The DWT figure I saw for Dali is 116, 851 tons. To that you add the Light Ship displacement to get the weight of the fully loaded ship.