Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: TonyBot
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 57 next>>
Dec 13, 2022 21:32:14   #
His look says: 'you jinxed me, Fool!'
Go to
Dec 13, 2022 21:30:40   #
My house, 125+/- years old. A marble will always roll, wherever you place it.
Granddaughters house, even older by a hundred years - c1790. Floorboards and walls, random 16" to 24" pine. Fieldstone foundation, cold cellar, 'bullet' glass windows, and rough-cut 2x8 stringers. Like a roller coaster, depending on the room.
Her husband didn't know which end of hammer to hold when they bought it.
He sure does, now!
Go to
Dec 10, 2022 21:35:46   #
burkphoto wrote:
Smart people NEVER buy an inkjet printer to save money. It isn't about that at all.

If you buy an inkjet printer, you want the following:

IMMEDIACY — You need a print RIGHT NOW.

PERMANENCE — You need ultimate print longevity with freedom from fading five times better than silver halide chromogenic prints from traditional photo labs, as tested by Wilhelm Imaging Research.

PRIVACY — You have subject matter that must be kept away from the general public. Maybe it's corporate trade secrets like the next iPhone, or maybe it's porn or spy work. Printing your own can keep the prints within a limited circle of confidants, whatever your purpose.

SUBSTRATES — You want to print on all sorts of different papers, canvas, art board, and maybe other surfaces.

COLOR and TONE — You manage your own color from end to end to make stunning art prints for sale or exhibition. There is no technology better than pigment inkjet printing for that purpose. It offers the widest possible tonal and color gamut when you print from 16-bit files, straight out of Lightroom Classic or Photoshop.

CONTROL — This is really a summary word. "Inkjet printing" are the last two words in the control freak's photo printing vocabulary.

Frankly, good pigment inkjet printing is the most EXPENSIVE form of photo printing most of us will ever do. IMHO, it is also the most satisfying.

I ran the digital departments of a major portrait lab for five years. Our inkjet prints were made on three 44" Epson printers. They were the highest quality prints we sold, and they were five times more costly to make and buy than silver halide prints. We made them only in sizes larger than 12x18 inches. Yet those printers ran 20 hours a day or more in peak season, printing class composites for senior classes, fraternities and sororities, sports teams, bands, and other groups, and for high school and college senior portraits. They were capable of subtle color and tonal gradations not possible with any of our conventional silver halide equipment, whether optical or digital.

Don't buy inkjet to save money. You'll be sorely disappointed in how costly it is, if you do.

One more note: DO manage color with proper tools. It can save you a fortune in inks, paper, and time consumption. Calibrate a worthy graphic arts monitor with a color calibration kit once a month. Test it to match your printer closely. Then enjoy the best prints you've ever seen.
Smart people NEVER buy an inkjet printer to save m... (show quote)


burkphoto sums it up very succinctly, but I'm going to add my 2¢ worth:

Printing your own work will *never* - repeat - *never* cost you less. Please, do not by an inkjet printer for that reason.

When you have the 'control', as Bill states, if you're like most of us, you may print two or three or even more times before you get the results you want. When you find that happening to you, make sure you have a box or two of 4x6 or 5x7 paper (in each of your favorite flavors) always available - for making and critiquing "proofs".

But, nothing is more satisfying than to have made the print, from 'click' to 'PP' to 'print' yourself!

My philosophic ramblings aside - I have had a Pro-10 for about six years, with nary a mechanical problem or ink clogging issue. The Pro-300 is the pigment ink replacement for it. I would recommend it highly.

(And, a friend of mine makes his living servicing wide format [as in 24" to 60"] Epsons. He states that the most common problem is clogged printheads, and that they have to be run almost daily to prevent it.)
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 11:38:30   #
lmTrying wrote:
I have heard some stories about SR-71s.

I read where one pilot said they could cross the US in 3 hours. Less if they had to. This works out to 1000 mph or faster. Believable.

Watched a slide show on US military birds. Even had photos of an SR-71 cockpit. He pointed at the dash and said that funny little mark on the airspeed indicator was mach 3, and there was more beyond that. 750 x 3 is 2250 mph. Wow!

Was told that one left an air show in England. It ran out of fuel over Prudo bay in Canada and glided to a landing in Dayton, Ohio.

Coming home from work one summer evening about 10 years ago, a contrail in the making caught my eye. Coming from the west, making a very, very large turn to the south, very high, very fast. I pulled off in a driveway to watch. It was all over in less than 5 minutes. What was it? I don't know. It was too high to tell. Eye witness fact.

So an hour and four minutes to cross the US I will believe because all indications have pointed to that 3000 mph capability.
I have heard some stories about SR-71s. br br I r... (show quote)


Follow up on sr71 speed - this URL says it all!

https://theaviationgeekclub.com/sr-71-pilot-explains-how-he-survived-to-his-blackbird-disintegration-at-a-speed-of-mach-3-2/
Go to
Nov 8, 2022 08:06:01   #
Check the charger?
Go to
Oct 31, 2022 14:41:37   #
amfoto1 wrote:
Maybe something is obstructing the larger size paper, near the edges.

Or perhaps the rollers that drive the paper need cleaning, are starting to slip with the larger, heavier paper.

It sounds to me as if you got a support person who is completely unfamiliar with the printer, since he didn't even know what size paper it uses. But I'm not a lot better, because I don't have a Pro 1000. I have seen those problems with other printers though.

Do you have any printer repair shops in your area?
Maybe something is obstructing the larger size pap... (show quote)


Agree with both points.

I'd check with Red River to see if their 'cleaning paper' will fit in your machine.
https://www.redrivercatalog.com/accessories/inkjet-printer-cleaning-sheets.html

And, since I have had my Pro-10 about six years and have called Canon service as little as 8 weeks and received excellent and courteous service from them. 800-652-2666
Go to
Oct 29, 2022 15:58:34   #
I take pictures.
I make photographs.
Go to
Oct 14, 2022 14:13:16   #
roger55 wrote:
I went with MPIX and finally got my print ordered.


Good choice. Highly regarded and respected.
Go to
Oct 14, 2022 13:42:41   #
roger55 wrote:
I am new to printing my pics. I am having problems getting a 16:9 ratio printed with out loosing critical image.
My pixels are 4681x2633.




I frequently print my 'art' prints on 11x17 paper, sizing my print to ~7x12.5, with 2" border top and sides and 2.5" border on bottom.

With the 7x12.5 equalling almost exactly the 9x16 ratio, you can see that printing on letter size or most commonly available print sizes you're going to be losing image.

When you print (and mat/frame) yourself it is easy to match the size. If you're using a commercial printer and/or framer, you will need to discuss with them what your goals are.

Most commercial printers will work with you, but I am not sure about high-volume houses, such as the highly and frequently recommended Costco and Walgreens.

If you're printing yourself:
What size *paper* are you using?
What program are you using to print?
Are you adjusting your borders to accommodate the 9x16 size?
Go to
Oct 13, 2022 11:36:48   #
MDI Mainer wrote:
I had posted about that previously. It belonged to Oskar Barnack himself.


Ah, 14.400,000 Euros.
And the video shows someone using his smartphone to take a picture of the proceedings.
What's this world coming to?
Go to
Oct 5, 2022 11:21:40   #
elliott937 wrote:
Julian, Here's how the Epson outperformed my former favorite ... Canon, and then HP.

Neither of the two mentioned brands included a CD of the print drivers. Neither. So I first bought the Canon, and followed their direction to go to the Canon website for the print drivers. really? At their website, my model was not listed, anywhere. Then I tried calling them. The recorded message said I had to apply for a Canon account, which I did. On my next call, back to the same "customer service", the recorded message instructed me to tell them the phone number I used to join. I gave it, and the next outgoing message said my "one year of customer service had expired". During all this trip, there was no way to actually talk to a human. Done with Canon.

Then the HP, and by the way, this would have been a $400 inkjet printer. At MicroCenter, standing next to the salesman was an HP REP. I told them I would not purchase it unless there truly WAS a CD enclosed with print drivers. The rep knelt on the floor and tilted the big box. "Yes", he said, it has an enclosed cd with print drivers. I was also told that I should connect the HP to the internet via a direct line. I didn't have one where the printer would go, so I purchased an either net hub, and two additional cables that would be needed. At home, opening the box, I found (a) NO cd with printer drivers, and then (b) the big printer had no receptacle for an either net cable. Double lie, and no printer to use. Return back to MicoCenter. On that trip, there happened to be an Epson Rep. He not only assured me that a cd with print drivers would be enclosed, but he opened a box to show it to me. At home, I was able to install it, and it works just fine. I'm totally done with Canon printers and HP printers.
Julian, Here's how the Epson outperformed my form... (show quote)


I have called Canon service for printer related (connectivity via WiFi) issues three times in the past few years - once as recently as a few months ago. This last time, the very helpful CS rep had me delete and then re-install a newer driver for one photo printer that is now five years old, and instructed me on how to make sure the correct driver was in a second, newer 'all-in-one', printer. (New Mac, old driver was Intel based) I have *never* been asked to create an account or give my phone number, nor have I been told my "warranty was expired".

Something doesn't seem right.
Go to
Oct 3, 2022 11:51:01   #
BobHartung wrote:
I have never had to wait hours for Apple Support to answer. You can also leave a call back number and they will call you.


When I migrated to the M1 Mac Mini I was also having some problems with installing/updating Adobe products. A call to Adobe got me (quickly) a tech rep, and his response was "Hmm... Some issues with the M1 installations. Try this instead ... I don't remember exactly, but it was not the install program on the disc and he had me download a different install program - after which everything worked fine.
Call Adobe.
Go to
Sep 15, 2022 09:40:17   #
Advice given previously is good - and the Tello plan sounds like I'll check up on it.

But, the direct answer to your question is YES. Verizon is the only carrier I am aware of that by contract will unlock your phone after 'x' days - which I think is 90. I am not sure it is automatic or you have to ask, but it can be done.
Go to
Sep 13, 2022 10:27:49   #
You got something against BOTs?
Go to
Sep 4, 2022 15:05:38   #
gmar3180 wrote:
Use archival pens. Here's what I purchased from Amazon for that purpose. Sakura Pigma 30062 Micron Blister Card Ink Pen Set, Black, Ass't Point Sizes 6CT Set , Beige


Best way - archival or pigment based pen (or brush). India ind is very good, very permanent.

NOTE: Do NOT use a 'Sharpie' - it is dye-based, it'll fade, and it'll bleed. (ditto 'magic marker')
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 57 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.