Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Just Trying To Focus
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Feb 6, 2017 13:24:29   #
Mr. B wrote:
Here are a few shots of a female pileated woodpecker feeding her young that I took last summer. Pileated woodpeckers do not feed their young whole prey. Instead they partially digest the grubs and insects (primarily ants) that they eat and regurgitated the food for the chicks. It's a rather violent and messy affair. Enjoy!


Great photos and a rare opportunity!!! I must say, those babies have faces only a mother could love!

Sandy
Go to
Feb 6, 2017 13:21:08   #
Philipschmitten wrote:
The verdict is in and it's a winner. I just have to give rave reviews about this very inexpensive lens. I was shocked at the lack of distortion and stopped down it has outstanding edge sharpness. If you are a Canon person and are thinking about a super wide angle. this is the one.

Philip in Texas


I agree! For years I had been borrowing my brother's wide angle zoom when I needed one, and finally I decided if one has to borrow something that many times, then maybe it's time they should purchase one for themselves. I opted for the Canon 10-18 STM and it was better than I had anticipated. Lightweight, too! It makes me want to pick up a couple more of the STM lenses!

Sandy
Go to
Feb 5, 2017 14:34:52   #
Swamp-Cork wrote:
Unfortunately we had to have a very old white oak removed in April of 2014 as it was dying, although we had tried to save it. Our tree person estimated it to be 175 years old, but for sure it probably was at least more than a century old, and always took for granted it would outlast us. Anyway it was tremendous and leaning out across the water and some of its great limbs extended over our pier. The only way it could be removed and keep it out of the water and also not damage the pier was with the assistance of a crane, and to clear a path for it, two smaller water oaks had to be removed. While the stump of the white oak remains intact, the water oaks have already deteriorated to the point that the woodpecker was feeding on the insects and grubs in the wood. I had been noticing the stumps for quite some time and couldn't imagine what was tearing them apart so rapidly, but thought it must be something powerful like the raccoons, but my wife Ellen recently saw this one feeding on the above stump. It was so close to our home that there was no way I could go outside without it seeing me, so barely opened a back door in the garage just enough to get the lens through and facing in its direction knowing that it would take flight if it saw any movement, and I was only a few feet from it! Clicked off some shots as fast as possible with the above results!
Unfortunately we had to have a very old white oak ... (show quote)


And what BEAUTIFUL shots you got!!! Excellent!!!!
Go to
Feb 5, 2017 08:02:17   #
Rob48 wrote:
Sometimes the male will execute several touch and go's before finally landing with the catch.


Fantastic shots!
Go to
Feb 5, 2017 07:48:38   #
sailorsmom wrote:
Beautiful hawk, Just Trying To Focus! Might be a cooper's but I'm not sure.


I am thinking Coopers Hawk, as well, though I'm not too knowledgeable on hawks. It was much larger than the hawk that was here the day before.
Go to
Feb 5, 2017 07:45:15   #
retiredsgt wrote:
Attached is a NOT thru the front window, BUT a through the side window, during a rain storm. Used my P900, and though there were rain drops on the screen, it came out pretty good. The birds were close to 100 yards away, and moving. I do like the P900.


That's a lot of turkeys! I have photographed flocks of turkeys and they do walk fast once they've been disturbed, and it's hard to keep them in the viewfinder!
Go to
Feb 4, 2017 11:39:47   #
Eblong wrote:
I have always been disappointed with the 18-270's image quality, so I took advantage of an offer at a local camera shop and traded in the 18-270 for a 16-300 PZD. The difference was astounding. I really like the faster focusing, and I like the added zoom range, but what I really appreciate is the improved image quality. It is now on my camera (an 80D) constantly unless I need a prime or the monster 150-600.


That's funny...I refer to my 150-600 as the "monster lens", too!
Go to
Feb 4, 2017 08:59:34   #
kschwegl wrote:
I'm a Nikon shooter, but I upgraded from the Tamron 18-270 to the 16-300. Very good lens. Very sharp and VC is much better. Image quality is better. (IMHO). Go for it.

Ken S.


Even if the image quality were only the same as the old 18-270, that extra focal length on both ends would be welcomed. Thanks for the input!

Sandy
Go to
Feb 4, 2017 08:57:53   #
Robert Bailey wrote:
If you go to the website www.dxomark.com they have tested both of these lenses.
Depending on which version of the 18 to 270 mm you have (and what camera you are using it on) it gets a score of 10 or 11 or 13 (more or less out of 50).
The 16 to 300 mm, with the same variables, gets a score of 12 or 17 (also more or less out of 50).
In summary, neither of them are great lenses, but the newer lens is slightly better than the older lens.




Good info! I'd never heard of dxomark. Thank you!
Go to
Feb 3, 2017 20:03:17   #
sleepydrdr wrote:
The dogs were more difficult than the cats. If you got down to their eye level you got a snotty nose on your camera lens, to them it means you want to play. I prefer shots without people restraining them, so I did what I could to get a natural appearance. Sissy's face shot was done by husband, ggttc (aka Greg) with D7100 and Nikon 18-55, hand held. The others were by me with Nikon D810 with Nikkor 24-120, hand held.
I'm happy to say that the first dog, Sissy, was adopted the following day after her photos were posted. That makes it all worth it. She came into the shelter a couple of months ago pregnant, had 10 puppies who have all been adopted. It was finally her turn.
The dogs were more difficult than the cats. If you... (show quote)


Beautiful photos that will pull at the heartstrings of possible adopters. I adopted a pit from a shelter. People keep breeding them, and it appears that about 80% of shelter dogs are pits. I'm sure your beautiful photos will help find them furever homes. ❤
Go to
Feb 3, 2017 19:58:30   #
wbchinook wrote:
Here is a link to what I thought was a great action series.

https://www.facebook.com/cindygoeddel/photos/pcb.10154533721657933/10154533720647933/?type=3&theater


Wow! What a great series!!!!!! We don't have lynx in my area...I've never seen one in the wild! Fabulous!
Go to
Feb 3, 2017 18:17:21   #
MT Shooter wrote:
IQ of the SP 16-300mm is at least 2 generations better than the 18-270mm Tamron. The original 18-270 was quite a good lens, but its IQ was somewhat compromised when it was updated to the PZD model with a much smaller front element and smaller filter size.

The Tamron 16-300mm may be upgraded to their "G2" line in the near future, just as their 70-200mm and 10-24mm are being upgraded right now.


I have the original (non PZD) model. It's not a terrible lens, and I think it is sharper on the 80D than my 70D, but it is a very noisy lens. My Tamron 150-600 seems near silent, but that 18-270 has always been loud. I am assuming the 16-300 is probably quieter.
Go to
Feb 3, 2017 18:09:31   #
willie-83 wrote:
Good Afternoon And Welcome To The "Thru The Front Window Club". I Find The Living Room With A Clean Front Window The Perfect Blind With All The Comforts, For My Winter Shooting. I've Attached 2 In This Reply, A Coopers Hawk (Always Uninvited) And A Cardinal. Hawk Taken With D200 And Nikon 18-200, Cardinal With D300 And Nikon 18-300. (I Like This One Too), He Is Uncontrollable But Very Photogenic, Nikon D200 And Nikon 70-210.
Keep Posting And Keep That Window Clean. Willie


Beautiful shots! I love your Cooper's hawk!
Go to
Feb 3, 2017 15:56:29   #
AntonioReyna wrote:
How do you like the 80D?


The 80d has a few nice features that the 70d didn't have, but as far as handling or image quality in my day to day use, I'm not seeing much difference, other than the extra megapixels.

The 80D offers two custom setting modes on the control dial versus one on the 70D. That's useful to me. The video snapshot feature is much nicer to use on the 80D than on the 70D. You can't shoot a still while in video mode on the 80D like you can on the 70D, though.

For what I use it for, the 80D isn't much of an upgrade from the 70D.
Go to
Feb 3, 2017 15:46:38   #
I currently have the Tamron 18-270 which I purchased in 2009. Has anyone gone from this lens to the Tamron 16-300, and if so, was it worthy of the switch? I know the limitations of superzooms, just wondering if the image quality of the 16-300 is worse than the 18-270.

Sandy
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.