Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tschmath
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 223 next>>
Mar 28, 2016 14:07:22   #
Bazbo wrote:
I got an ebook version of Trump's Art of the Deal. Unfortunatly, every time I try to turn a page, it takes me directly to Chapter 11.

Weird, right?


Classic!!! :) :) :-)
Go to
Mar 25, 2016 13:34:33   #
Huey Driver wrote:
Illegal Aliens

Just received this in an email
In case you you haven’t seen this...
Here is number eight US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens


You just received this in an email. Famous last words for every right winger who can't take the time to check out the truth of something on the internet.

Try looking up U.S. Code 1182. I did. The entire act is about individual aliens and entry into this country. Nowhere is the president mentioned. The quote you supplied is totally made up and bogus. If I missed it, then tell me what section and subsection this bullshit quote is from and I'll admit I'm wrong. Until then, do some basic research before you post garbage like this.
Go to
Mar 20, 2016 02:46:53   #
letmedance wrote:
To compare the 2 is disingenuous.


Enlighten me.
Go to
Mar 20, 2016 00:44:16   #
Wellhiem wrote:
That's pretty much what I thought. But unless it was a bizarre coincidence, it would be quite an elaborate setup. It would require some fore-knowledge of exactly where the camera crew would be. That's assuming it was a genuine news report.


I really think it was just a one-in-million shot, and everyone just freaked out.
Go to
Mar 20, 2016 00:40:47   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
I don't really see a parallel.


Of course you don't.

Those people that day shut down the Edmund Pettis bridge, just like the people did today on the freeway. That day lots of people were inconvenienced, just like today. So, according to you, those people on the bridge should have been run over while they peacefully protested. Wow.

Congressman John Lewis was there on Bloody Sunday, and was nearly killed as he nonviolently walked across the bridge, by police who beat him almost to death. But hey, he inconvenienced some folks who couldn't drive to work, so I guess you think it was OK to nearly kill him. They beat him with nightsticks instead of running him over, which you say is alright. Wow.
Go to
Mar 19, 2016 21:51:42   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Here we go again, snot nosed bed wetting liberal idiots think it their right to shut down major thoroughfares in our nations cities so that they can make political statements....

Here's to hoping that most of them end up in jail and that more than a few of them get their asses run over....

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/03/19/3761871/trump-protests-arizona-new-york/


So I'm guessing you were just fine with what went on on the Edmund Pettis bridge when cops almost killed protesters who were trying to peacefully march to Selma back in the day.
Go to
Mar 19, 2016 21:48:17   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
LOL Wonder what White people rioting would look like.


Just Google 1968 Democratic convention.
Go to
Mar 19, 2016 21:40:55   #
The woman does not vanish. She is actually behind the woman who is walking off camera, it's just real hard to see unless you're looking for it.
Go to
Mar 19, 2016 14:48:51   #
Keenan wrote:
LOL you are so full of shit. Now you are tying yourself into knots to deny the fact that the Senate never before denied the President the ability to fill a Supreme Court vacancy in an election year, even when the opposition party controlled the Senate. You can't admit it, so now you simply re-phrase the instance where a justice was confirmed by a Sanate of the opposing party as a "bipartisan political deal", to pretend that what the Senate Republicans are doing now is not outrageous and extreme. Of course, all one has to do to debunk your nonsense is to point out the fact that every time the majority party in the Senate does not have a filibuster proof 60 vote majority, there is a "bipartisan political deal" to confirm a justice, silly.
LOL you are so full of shit. Now you are tying you... (show quote)


&#128515;&#128515;&#128515;&#128515;&#128515;
Go to
Mar 19, 2016 06:34:43   #
robertjerl wrote:
I believe 5 of them were confirmed by a Senate of the same party as the president and in the exception it was a bipartisan political deal between the president and senators of both parties.

None confirmed for a lame duck president by an opposition senate.


We do not have a lame duck President. Obama is not a lame duck President until the day after election day. THAT is the definition of lame duck - the period between election day and inauguration day.
Go to
Mar 18, 2016 19:30:31   #
Can't wait to see Rac's head explode over this one.
Go to
Mar 12, 2016 22:17:00   #
Here is yet another recycled story from January. Why waste our time with this old news? Next thing you'll be posting stories about the Kennedy assassination.
Go to
Mar 12, 2016 22:15:30   #
This story is old news from January. Have you run out of current things to cut and paste so now you're just recycling old news?
Go to
Mar 10, 2016 20:14:44   #
nakkh wrote:
Bingo-


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


OK, let's play a game. How are all of the other presidents on this list different from President Obama? Hmmmm. Let's see.

I've wracked my brain, and the only the only thing I can think of is that all of the other presidents, who were never criticized for non-attendance, are white, and Obama, who is criticized for EVERYTHING, is black.

Coincidence? I think not.
Go to
Mar 10, 2016 19:33:39   #
Typical right wing hypocrisy


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 223 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.