Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: leftj
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 381 next>>
Oct 4, 2023 08:33:47   #
Silverhair2048 wrote:
When I was trying to develop my own triad of lenses I acquired this lens just before I had a chance to get a 17-35 mm f2.8 lens. So not having a need for 2 of the same type of lens I did some research to see what the usual price was for a 16-35 mm f4 lens. The prices averaged between $430-500+. So with the inclusion of a hard case, both lens caps, hood, and filter I figure that $450 is a reasonable price. I would prefer to ship within the US and would ask for $40 as a shipping charge. I will be adding some photos later, but wanted to get this out and posted.

I wish you all a long and happy life.
When I was trying to develop my own triad of lense... (show quote)


Would you confirm that this is a G lens?
Go to
Oct 2, 2023 07:46:51   #
trapper1 wrote:
If there is no intention of altering an image after taking it, is there any advantage in shooting RAW vs. JPG, such as greater sharpness, etc.?


Trapper1


That's a question only you can answer.
Go to
Oct 1, 2023 17:19:12   #
AzPicLady wrote:
I don't know what is in each one. I wish I did.


Each update tells you what it contains.
Go to
Oct 1, 2023 09:47:27   #
Architect1776 wrote:
Because phones are worthless when there is no signal.
Only good in cities or places with cell towers.
I know.


What an ignorant statement.
Go to
Oct 1, 2023 09:08:46   #
AzPicLady wrote:
I do use my phone's GPS, but it doesn't talk to me like my GPS does, even though I unmute it. So I have to keep looking at it to not miss turns, etc. Annoying. I'm on blue tooth in my truck, but I've never gotten the maps to work on the truck. It wants to use its own GPS, and it's so outdated and also doesn't talk to me unless I keep pushing buttons. Not going to happen on strange, busy city freeways going 70 MPH!


Google Maps on my iPhone works and talks to me just fine.
Go to
Oct 1, 2023 09:06:31   #
AzPicLady wrote:
I recently received notice that there are several updates for the R3. I had tried to do that one received prior but didn't know how. I decided to do it, and it actually worked pretty seamlessly. I haven't used the camera since, so I don't know if it got ruined. And I still have 6 updates to do to be totally up to date.

I'm going to be needing my GPS a lot in upcoming days, and I knew there was a map update available. I had done this several times, and although time-consuming, it was pretty simple. So I started in. It stalled at 41% transferred data, and it was taking forever. I left it to grind away overnight, and started in again the next morning when maybe my internet connection would be better. Again, it stopped at about 40%. After several attempts, I started a chat, finally getting to a real person. She was pretty good, and finally determined that the newest map was bigger than my old device could handle. I had two choices, download partial maps or use an SD card. I opted for the SD card, went and bought one, then followed the directions on how to use it. It didn't work. I can't go back to my previous map because it is now corrupted. It won't uninstall, as was suggested to me. So my device is now a piece of expensive worthless plastic! This is why I don't update my cameras! If the same thing were to happen to my camera, I'd be devastated!
I recently received notice that there are several ... (show quote)


With respect to camera updates installing the last update includes all previous updates. With respect to GPS why not just use Google Maps on you phone?
Go to
Sep 25, 2023 12:43:14   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The excitement of learning separates youth from old age. As long as you're learning you're not old.


This has nothing to do with learning. It's about changing the organization that did not need to be changed.
Go to
Sep 25, 2023 07:12:46   #
nison777 wrote:
I noticed that comments are not being accepted directly ...So I just thought how others feel about having to sift threw random topics like a social media page to somehow find something of interesting to be informed about...

Instead of the previous well organized site...
Did someone get lazy???
Because this new layout is alot of work to get threw...
Does anyone feel the same????


I agree. The new organization of UHH is terrible!
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 14:26:48   #
josquin1 wrote:
They're just trying to do what all companies try to do: make money from anybody they can.


Hmmm, I guess companies should not want to make a profit. Socialism here we come.
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 14:04:33   #
OldCADuser wrote:
Geez, I make one misstatement and I admit it and apologize for the error, yet people are still calling me out on it. Didn't anyone read my apology or are you simply failing to acknowledge it. I guess next time, I'll just keep my mouth shut as showing remorse is just a waste of time for this crowd...


The violin is playing. You just trashed a new camera model that you knew next to nothing about. What did you expect - butterfly kisses?
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 10:55:30   #
rehess wrote:
The question how many of them could be sold? In general, R&D resouces are used to produce SALES.


I’ll bet the waiting time will be lengthy.
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 10:08:17   #
OldCADuser wrote:
Sorry about the mix-up with the Zf and Zfc. I didn't drill-down far enough to realize that the 'c' probably stood for 'cropped' and not 'chrome', but you have to admit, they look nearly identical (but the 28mm lens should have been a hint since that's a bit odd for a full-frame prime lens):


There’s a lot you didn’t drill down far enough to learn.
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 10:05:46   #
OldCADuser wrote:
Technically you're correct, the Nikon Zf is only available in black, but the Nikon Zfc is the same camera in chrome, and in fact, was introduced first, I guess to help reinforce that 'retro-look'. Note that the last chrome camera I had was a Minolta XG-M which I bought in 1982.


Nikon Zfc is not the same camera.
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 10:04:09   #
larryepage wrote:
Actually, it's only available in black, with various colors of leatherette available.

The funny thing to me is that the target market is young folks from 25-35 or so, but they are getting gobbled up by older folks who already have much better cameras. I took a stroll thrugh the detailed information on the NikonUSA website this morning, and while there are a couple of features and specifications that are interesting, for the most part, this camera is operationally pretty unremarkable. Some of the most interesting and eye-catching specs, on closer examination, are applicable only in very limited situations or in ery particular circumstances. And while the video capabilities seem very impressive, the camera uses only an SD and a Micro SD card, none of the more modern, more capable options.

I do own and use Nikon cameras. I would prefer that they focus on designing and making more useful mainstream cameras, or that they would focus this energy and money on supporting the millions of F mount cameras that are still in service and will remain so for many years. This is not a camera that I will buy.
Actually, it's only available in black, with vario... (show quote)


Guess what. You Don’t have to buy it.
Go to
Sep 21, 2023 10:01:24   #
OldCADuser wrote:
I just saw an advert for the new Nikon Zf series of full-frame mirrorless cameras and they're really pushing this 'retro-look'. I don't know, but first off, one of the reasons, at least this is how I see it, in going mirrorless was so that camera designers would no longer be locked into a configuration dictated by the optical path of a mirror and viewfinder.

And to make this 'retro-look' even more pronounced, it appears that they're moving more of the controls back to dedicated knobs on the top of the camera. All they're missing is a faux film-advance and hinge on the side of the body.

Now I'll be the first to acknowledge that the LCD screen-based menu systems on many digital cameras can be frustrating (after all, I own Sony cameras ;-) but things have gotten better and with the introduction of customizable buttons (my Sony a6500 has three), you can at least program the most common option settings that you need quick access to.

Anyway, what do others think of this effort...

Disclaimer: I've never owned a Nikon, film-based or otherwise, and have been mirrorless since 2013 when I bought a Sony NEX-3N. My current mainline camera is a Sony a6500, but I've still got an a6000 and a A65 DSLR, which are occasionally called into service.

To see what I mean about this Nikon 'retro-look', here's what the new Zf looks like. Note that it's also available in all-black so at least they're not going all the way back into camera history to get this new look:
I just saw an advert for the new Nikon Zf series o... (show quote)


The pic you are showing is not the Zf. It’s the Zfc. Nikon is not pushing it. They are offering it as one of many camera alternatives. Why are you so concerned? Are you afraid Nikon will require you to buy it?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 381 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.