ole sarg wrote:
http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=785
http://www.snopes.com/autos/business/carburetor.asp
About as reliable as Dr. Sebi's claims
The thing that I really really love about super claims like these is that they so rarely, never?, actually quote anyone or reference any specifics that could be evaluated.
I found two statements, among many!, in the linked pages, which are so indicative of what I mean.
#1 "All those involved in the Interstate highway test runs found no gimmicks."
Consider" WHO were those involved in the Interstate (sic) highway test runs? Hmmmmm? FWIW - No one was named.
#2 "The Energy Research and Development Administration officials who viewed this invention gave a guarded evaluation, but was certain of one thingÂ… and that is this was not a hoax."
Consider: Have you ever heard of the "Energy Research and Development Administration"? I haven't. I don't believe it ever existed; however, it sure sounds official so the statements must be true! BTW - No one with the "Energy Research and Development Administration" was named.
When I ask for proof, I want actual facts which can be validated and/or verified. FWIW - If I have no chance of proving a statement is false, the statement is of no value except, perhaps, to the microbes living in the exhaled breath occurring while making the statements.
My hero in considering such claims, though I am an unworthy acolyte, was Richard Feynman the Physicist. Another is James Randi.